The DOE E3SM v1.1 Biogeochemistry Configuration: Description and Simulated Ecosystem‐Climate Responses to Historical Changes in Forcing.

This paper documents the biogeochemistry configuration of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM), E3SMv1.1‐BGC. The model simulates historical carbon cycle dynamics, including carbon losses predicted in response to land use and land cover change, and the responses of the carbon cycle to changes in climate. In addition, we introduce several innovations in the treatment of soil nutrient limitation mechanisms, including explicit dependence on phosphorus availability. The suite of simulations described here includes E3SM contributions to the Coupled Climate‐Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project and other projects, as well as simulations to explore the impacts of structural uncertainty in representations of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. We describe the model spin‐up and evaluation procedures, provide an overview of results from the simulation campaign, and highlight key features of the simulations. Cumulative warming over the twentieth century is similar to observations, with a midcentury cold bias offset by stronger warming in recent decades. Ocean biomass production and carbon uptake are underpredicted, likely due to biases in ocean transport leading to widespread anoxia and undersupply of nutrients to surface waters. The inclusion of nutrient limitations in the land biogeochemistry results in weaker carbon fertilization and carbon‐climate feedbacks than exhibited by other Earth System Models that exclude those limitations. Finally, we compare with an alternative representation of terrestrial biogeochemistry, which differs in structure and in initialization of soil phosphorus. While both configurations agree well with observational benchmarks, they differ significantly in their distribution of carbon among different pools and in the strength of nutrient limitations. Plain Language Summary: A new state‐of‐the‐art Earth System Model has been funded by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to explore questions relevant to DOE's mission. The Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1.1 (E3SMv1.1) represents nitrogen and phosphorous controls on the carbon cycle and extends the recently released E3SMv1 to include active biogeochemistry in the land, ocean, and ice components. E3SMv1.1 also includes an alternative representation of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles that is used to explore model structural uncertainties. E3SMv1.1's capabilities are demonstrated through a set of experiments described by the Coupled Climate‐Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project, aimed at understanding the influence of changes in climate and CO2 on the carbon cycle. Simulations of the land surface properties and terrestrial carbon cycle compare well with observations, as does the simulated global and regional climate. Nutrient limitations result in less land carbon uptake compared to models that exclude these limitations. However, variations in model structure and initialization influence the magnitude of those limitations and carbon cycle dynamics. The ocean biogeochemistry in E3SMv1.1 simulates less biomass and slightly lower anthropogenic carbon uptake than is observed. Future efforts will aim to reduce model biases as well as to include additional aspects of global carbon cycle dynamics. Key Points: Introduces the U.S. DOE's Energy Exascale Earth System Model‐Biogeochemistry version, E3SMv1.1‐BGC, is introducedEcosystem‐climate responses are characterized in a standard set of C4MIP‐type simulationsThe impacts of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitations and their structural uncertainties are explored [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)