Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments.

Tytuł :
Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey: identification, selection and application of most appropriate instruments.
Autorzy :
Vrijhoef HJ; University of Maastricht Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Public Health and Primary Care Research School PO Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht The Netherlands. />Berbee R
Wagner EH
Steuten LM
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy [Health Expect] 2009 Dec; Vol. 12 (4), pp. 417-29. Date of Electronic Publication: 2009 Aug 26.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Wiley, c1998-
MeSH Terms :
Patient Satisfaction*
Quality of Health Care*
Health Care Surveys/*instrumentation
Adult ; Aged ; Chronic Disease/therapy ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands
References :
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):21-4. (PMID: 11585169)
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2000;(39):s8-14. (PMID: 10945072)
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(5):577-82. (PMID: 7100990)
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jan;6(1):70-6. (PMID: 11009748)
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Dec;16(6):652-9. (PMID: 16524940)
Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):839-46. (PMID: 10470432)
Int J Integr Care. 2001;1:e21. (PMID: 16896400)
Manag Care Q. 1996 Spring;4(2):12-25. (PMID: 10157259)
Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;19(3):257-63. (PMID: 11978716)
Gerontologist. 2004 Jun;44(3):348-57. (PMID: 15197289)
Urology. 1999 Apr;53(4):793-9. (PMID: 10197859)
Med Care. 1990 Mar;28(3):261-70. (PMID: 2314135)
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. (PMID: 15838407)
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):565-78. (PMID: 15189754)
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;43(8):799-802. (PMID: 1427679)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Oct;14(5):353-8. (PMID: 12389801)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):806-13. (PMID: 17824876)
J Nurs Meas. 1999 Spring;7(1):47-62. (PMID: 10394774)
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2000;(39):s41-8. (PMID: 10945077)
Psychol Rep. 1993 Apr;72(2):387-90. (PMID: 8488222)
Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49-79. (PMID: 10125117)
Outcomes Manag. 2002 Jul-Sep;6(3):125-31. (PMID: 12134376)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167-77. (PMID: 11124733)
J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11 Suppl 1:S7-15. (PMID: 16332190)
Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):82-95. (PMID: 11281863)
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):335-47. (PMID: 10267261)
BMJ. 2007 Nov 17;335(7628):1021-2. (PMID: 18007003)
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Apr;8(4):365-72. (PMID: 11950131)
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):185-210. (PMID: 10299618)
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Apr;3(4):579-94. (PMID: 10169526)
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:12. (PMID: 14987333)
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. (PMID: 14727785)
Minerva Med. 1998 Mar;89(3):57-64. (PMID: 9575331)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Oct;16(10):1173-8. (PMID: 1836677)
Seizure. 2000 Dec;9(8):551-8. (PMID: 11162752)
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20090828 Date Completed: 20100202 Latest Revision: 20181113
Update Code :
PubMed Central ID :
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: To identify the most appropriate generic instrument to measure experience and/or satisfaction of people receiving integrated chronic care.
Background: Health care is becoming more user-centred and, as a result, the experience of users of care and evaluation of their experience and/or satisfaction is taken more seriously. It is unclear to what extent existing instruments are appropriate in measuring the experience and/or satisfaction of people using integrated chronic care.
Methods: Instruments were identified by means of a systematic literature review. Appropriateness of instruments was analysed on seven criteria. The two most promising instruments were translated into Dutch, if necessary, and administered to a convenience sample of 109 people with a chronic illness. Data derived from respondents were analysed statistically. Focus-group interviews were conducted to assess the semantic and technical equivalence as well as opinions of people about the applicability and relevance of the translated instruments.
Results: From 37 instruments identified, the Patients' Assessment of Care for chronIc Conditions (PACIC) and the short form of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III (PSQ-18) were selected as most promising instruments. Both instruments produced similar median scores across people with different chronic conditions. The overall PACIC and its subscales and the overall PSQ-18 were highly internally consistent, but not the PSQ-18 subscales. Overall, the PACIC demonstrated better psychometric characteristics. PACIC and PSQ-18 scores were found to be moderately correlated. Whereas more respondents preferred the PSQ-18, focus-group participants regarded the PACIC to be more applicable and relevant. The technical and semantic equivalence of both instruments were sufficient.
Conclusions: Because of its psychometric characteristics, perceived applicability and relevance, the PACIC is the most appropriate instrument to measure the experience of people receiving integrated chronic care.
Comment in: Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):218; author reply 218-9. (PMID: 20536540)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies