Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Accuracy of a dual path platform (DPP) assay for the rapid point-of-care diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

Tytuł:
Accuracy of a dual path platform (DPP) assay for the rapid point-of-care diagnosis of human leptospirosis.
Autorzy:
Nabity SA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ribeiro GS
Aquino CL
Takahashi D
Damião AO
Gonçalves AH
Miranda-Filho DB
Greenwald R
Esfandiari J
Lyashchenko KP
Reis MG
Medeiros MA
Ko AI
Źródło:
PLoS neglected tropical diseases [PLoS Negl Trop Dis] 2012; Vol. 6 (11), pp. e1878. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Nov 01.
Typ publikacji:
Evaluation Study; Journal Article; Research Support, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
Point-of-Care Systems*
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/*methods
Leptospira/*immunology
Leptospirosis/*diagnosis
Adolescent ; Adult ; Brazil ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoassay/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult
References:
Trop Med Int Health. 1999 Jan;4(1):38-45. (PMID: 10203172)
Lancet. 1999 Sep 4;354(9181):820-5. (PMID: 10485724)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Aug;8(4):541-7. (PMID: 18447625)
Infect Immun. 2005 Jan;73(1):70-8. (PMID: 15618142)
Lancet. 1988 Feb 27;1(8583):433-5. (PMID: 2893865)
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001 Jan;8(1):166-9. (PMID: 11139212)
J Gen Microbiol. 1985 Feb;131(2):377-85. (PMID: 3981131)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002 May;66(5):605-10. (PMID: 12201599)
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Apr;40(4):1464-9. (PMID: 11923374)
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1999 Jul 23;74(29):237-42. (PMID: 10437435)
Microbiology (Reading). 2007 Oct;153(Pt 10):3390-3398. (PMID: 17906138)
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 24;5(6):e11301. (PMID: 20585579)
Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;12(4):351-7. (PMID: 18055245)
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 May;45(5):1528-34. (PMID: 17360842)
J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000 Oct;2(4):341-4. (PMID: 11075904)
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 May;44(5):1853-5. (PMID: 16672421)
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007 Sep-Oct;40(5):499-504. (PMID: 17992402)
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16236. (PMID: 21283633)
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):1938-42. (PMID: 9230359)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(53):1-80. (PMID: 7565537)
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Feb;41(2):803-9. (PMID: 12574287)
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 7;138(1):40-4. (PMID: 12513043)
J Infect. 2005 Aug;51(2):E67-70. (PMID: 16038755)
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):296-326. (PMID: 11292640)
Ann Intern Med. 1984 May;100(5):696-8. (PMID: 6712032)
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jan;38(1):450-2. (PMID: 10618140)
Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):395-9. (PMID: 8062397)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Mar;14(3):505-8. (PMID: 18325275)
Acta Trop. 2007 Jun;102(3):206-11. (PMID: 17618860)
Acta Trop. 2008 Oct;108(1):1-5. (PMID: 18721789)
Mol Microbiol. 2003 Aug;49(4):929-45. (PMID: 12890019)
Trop Med Int Health. 2000 Feb;5(2):124-8. (PMID: 10747272)
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55(3):322-31. (PMID: 22523263)
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3138-42. (PMID: 9774553)
Infect Genet Evol. 2009 Mar;9(2):196-205. (PMID: 19028604)
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1245-8. (PMID: 17652521)
Infect Immun. 2007 May;75(5):2441-50. (PMID: 17296754)
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec;48(12):4615-9. (PMID: 20881177)
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2002 Mar-Apr;44(2):79-83. (PMID: 12048544)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Nov;65(5):657-63. (PMID: 11716133)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008 Apr 23;2(4):e228. (PMID: 18431445)
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 09;6(2):e16879. (PMID: 21347378)
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 May;65(2):247-57. (PMID: 16253361)
J Med Microbiol. 1978 Nov;11(4):387-400. (PMID: 722781)
Vaccine. 2007 Aug 14;25(33):6277-86. (PMID: 17629368)
BMC Microbiol. 2011 Jun 09;11:129. (PMID: 21658265)
Grant Information:
U01 AI088752 United States AI NIAID NIH HHS; D43 TW000919 United States TW FIC NIH HHS; D43 TW00919 United States TW FIC NIH HHS; R24 TW007988 United States TW FIC NIH HHS; R01 AI052473 United States AI NIAID NIH HHS; R44 A1072856 United States PHS HHS; R01 TW009504 United States TW FIC NIH HHS; R44 AI072856 United States AI NIAID NIH HHS
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20121108 Date Completed: 20130405 Latest Revision: 20211021
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC3486890
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0001878
PMID:
23133686
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Diagnosis of leptospirosis by the gold standard serologic assay, the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), requires paired sera and is not widely available. We developed a rapid assay using immunodominant Leptospira immunoglobulin-like (Lig) proteins in a Dual Path Platform (DPP). This study aimed to evaluate the assay's diagnostic performance in the setting of urban transmission.
Methodology: We determined test sensitivity using 446 acute and convalescent sera from MAT-confirmed case-patients with severe or mild leptospirosis in Brazil. We assessed test specificity using 677 sera from the following groups: healthy residents of a Brazilian slum with endemic transmission, febrile outpatients from the same slum, healthy blood donors, and patients with dengue, hepatitis A, and syphilis. Three operators independently interpreted visual results without knowing specimen status.
Results: The overall sensitivity for paired sera was 100% and 73% for severe and mild disease, respectively. In the acute phase, the assay achieved a sensitivity of 85% and 64% for severe and mild leptospirosis, respectively. Within seven days of illness onset, the assay achieved a sensitivity of 77% for severe disease and 60% for mild leptospirosis. Sensitivity of the DPP assay was similar to that for IgM-ELISA and increased with both duration of symptoms (chi-square regression P = 0.002) and agglutinating titer (Spearman ρ = 0.24, P<0.001). Specificity was ≥93% for dengue, hepatitis A, syphilis, febrile outpatients, and blood donors, while it was 86% for healthy slum residents. Inter-operator agreement ranged from very good to excellent (kappa: 0.82-0.94) and test-to-test reproducibility was also high (kappa: 0.89).
Conclusions: The DPP assay performed acceptably well for diagnosis of severe acute clinical leptospirosis and can be easily implemented in hospitals and health posts where leptospirosis is a major public health problem. However, test accuracy may need improvement for mild disease and early stage leptospirosis, particularly in regions with high transmission.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies