Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Persistent sterile peritoneal inflammation after catheter removal for refractory bacterial peritonitis predicts full-blown encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.

Tytuł:
Persistent sterile peritoneal inflammation after catheter removal for refractory bacterial peritonitis predicts full-blown encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis.
Autorzy:
Wong YY; Renal Unit,1 Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, and Department of Radiology,2 Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, PR China.
Wong PN
Mak SK
Chan SF
Cheuk YY
Ho LY
Lo KY
Lo MW
Lo KC
Tong GM
Wong AK
Źródło:
Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis [Perit Dial Int] 2013 Sep-Oct; Vol. 33 (5), pp. 507-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Aug 01.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2020- : [Thousand Oaks, CA] : SAGE Publications
Original Publication: New York : Pergamon Press, c1988-
MeSH Terms:
Bacterial Infections/*therapy
Catheters, Indwelling/*adverse effects
Device Removal/*adverse effects
Kidney Failure, Chronic/*therapy
Peritoneal Dialysis/*instrumentation
Peritoneal Fibrosis/*etiology
Peritonitis/*complications
Bacterial Infections/complications ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hong Kong/epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity/trends ; Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects ; Peritoneal Fibrosis/diagnosis ; Peritoneal Fibrosis/epidemiology ; Peritoneum/pathology ; Peritonitis/diagnosis ; Peritonitis/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate/trends
References:
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):163-9. (PMID: 20124195)
Kidney Int. 2005 Nov;68(5):2381-8. (PMID: 16221244)
Adv Perit Dial. 2006;22:94-8. (PMID: 16983948)
Clin Radiol. 2007 Aug;62(8):732-7. (PMID: 17604760)
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998 Jan;13(1):154-9. (PMID: 9481732)
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jul;4(7):1222-9. (PMID: 19541815)
Perit Dial Int. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):269-78. (PMID: 21454391)
Perit Dial Int. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(6):595-600. (PMID: 19910558)
Perit Dial Int. 2005 Apr;25 Suppl 4:S19-29. (PMID: 16300269)
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Feb;22(2):560-7. (PMID: 17035369)
Lancet. 1983 Jul 9;2(8341):113-4. (PMID: 6134956)
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Oct;24(10):3209-15. (PMID: 19211652)
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Apr;26(4):1374-9. (PMID: 20810453)
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Oct;44(4):729-37. (PMID: 15384025)
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2591-8. (PMID: 16885406)
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1702-10. (PMID: 18667742)
Perit Dial Int. 2005 Apr;25 Suppl 4:S30-8. (PMID: 16300270)
Perit Dial Int. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):34-8. (PMID: 20448239)
Perit Dial Int. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):517-22. (PMID: 19776044)
Perit Dial Int. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):352-60. (PMID: 18556377)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Catheter removal; encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis; mortality; refractory peritonitis
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20130803 Date Completed: 20140710 Latest Revision: 20211021
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC3797669
DOI:
10.3747/pdi.2012.00281
PMID:
23907832
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is the most serious complication of peritoneal dialysis, having high morbidity and mortality. To improve outcomes, early diagnosis is needed to direct treatment during the early inflammatory phase. However, in the early inflammatory phase, clinical features are nonspecific, and no reliable diagnostic criteria have been established. Because bacterial peritonitis and termination of dialysis are two important risk factors triggering the progression of EPS, patients with refractory bacterial peritonitis necessitating dialysis catheter removal are at particularly high risk of developing EPS. Many of these patients might indeed experience non-resolving sterile peritonitis (probably the inflammatory phase of EPS) before progression to full-blown disease (that is, the presence of intestinal obstruction). We undertook a retrospective study to compare, in this particular situation, the clinical characteristics of patients with or without sterile peritoneal inflammation, assessing their clinical outcomes in terms of short-term mortality and the chance of developing full-blown EPS.
Methods: Our retrospective review included 62 patients whose dialysis catheter was removed because of refractory peritonitis between January 2005 and December 2010.
Results: Of the 62 patients identified, 39 (63%) had persistent sterile peritoneal inflammation ("high-risk" group, n = 39), and 23 (37%) had resolution of inflammation without significant intra-abdominal collection after catheter withdrawal ("control" group, n = 23). Compared with the control group, the high-risk group had a significantly longer PD duration (71.6 ± 43.3 months vs 42.3 ± 29.9 months, p = 0.003), a higher dialysate-to-plasma ratio (D/P) of creatinine (0.768 ± 0.141 vs 0.616 ± 0.091, p = 0.004), and a higher computed tomography score for EPS (7.69 ± 2.98 vs 1.00 ± 1.00, p < 0.001). During the 6-month study period, the high-risk group had a higher chance of developing full-blown EPS (31% vs 0%, p = 0.002) and a higher 6-month all-cause mortality (36% vs 4.3%, p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Persistent sterile peritoneal inflammation was common after dialysis catheter removal for refractory bacterial peritonitis, and the patients with such inflammation were at high risk of progression to full-blown EPS.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies