Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Schools as smoke-free zones? Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools.

Tytuł:
Schools as smoke-free zones? Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of outdoor school ground smoking bans at secondary schools.
Autorzy:
Rozema AD; Department Tranzo, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, 5000 LE The Netherlands.
Mathijssen JJ; Department Tranzo, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, 5000 LE The Netherlands.
Jansen MW; Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg (GGD ZL), Geleen, The Netherlands ; Department of Health Services Research, School for Public Health and Primary Care CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
van Oers JA; Department Tranzo, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, 5000 LE The Netherlands ; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Źródło:
Tobacco induced diseases [Tob Induc Dis] 2016 Mar 29; Vol. 14, pp. 10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Mar 29 (Print Publication: 2016).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2018- : [Heraklion, Crete] : European Publishing on behalf of International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
Original Publication: [Essen, Germany] : International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2002-
References:
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):333-7. (PMID: 10926588)
Tob Control. 2015 Sep;24(5):449-54. (PMID: 24794715)
Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):80-9. (PMID: 24398826)
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):117-23. (PMID: 11387531)
Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1918-26. (PMID: 19663897)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 24;(10):CD009990. (PMID: 25342250)
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1098-100. (PMID: 25521901)
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18. (PMID: 10591275)
Tob Control. 2010 Aug;19(4):311-7. (PMID: 20472575)
Lancet. 2014 May 3;383(9928):1549-60. (PMID: 24680633)
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;170(4):408-13. (PMID: 23318372)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):107-23. (PMID: 15051705)
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):501-10. (PMID: 24951511)
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 15;13:756. (PMID: 23947336)
J Community Health. 2012 Aug;37(4):855-64. (PMID: 22143163)
Biochem Pharmacol. 2009 Oct 1;78(7):873-9. (PMID: 19576867)
Health Educ Res. 2004 Jun;19(3):217-26. (PMID: 15140842)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Nov;47(11):1451-8. (PMID: 20598692)
Health Educ Res. 2002 Aug;17(4):461-70. (PMID: 12197591)
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):428-35. (PMID: 20470969)
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(4):295-301. (PMID: 23716172)
Health Promot J Austr. 2014 Aug;25(2):136-8. (PMID: 24988137)
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. (PMID: 10474547)
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. (PMID: 18322790)
Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(9):1090-8. (PMID: 21391810)
Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):87-108. (PMID: 10178339)
Prev Med. 2005 Feb;40(2):239-48. (PMID: 15533535)
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Jun;30(3):375-91. (PMID: 19731502)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Adoption; Health promotion; Secondary school; Smoke-free; Tobacco control policy
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20160401 Date Completed: 20160331 Latest Revision: 20200930
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC4812616
DOI:
10.1186/s12971-016-0076-9
PMID:
27030793
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Whereas smoking bans inside secondary school buildings are relatively widespread, a smoking ban for the outdoor school grounds is less common. Therefore, this study investigates why many secondary schools fail to adopt an outdoor school ground smoking ban. The aim is to elucidate the perceived barriers and facilitators of stakeholders at schools without an outdoor school ground smoking ban.
Methods: Qualitative data were obtained from 60 respondents of 15 secondary schools. Semi-structured interviews were held with various key stakeholders and a thematic approach was used for analysis of the transcripts.
Results: The perceived barriers and facilitators of the stakeholders fell into four categories: 1) socio-political characteristics (legislation and social norm), 2) school characteristics (policy, decision process, enforcement, resources, workforce conditions, communication and collaboration), 3) individual characteristics (support, knowledge, and target group), and 4) smoking ban characteristics (environmental factors, guideline recommendations, outcome expectations, and evidence).
Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of legislation for outdoor smoking bans. Moreover, collaboration, communication and involving stakeholders during an early stage of the process should be stimulated, as this might increase adoption. These results can be applied in future studies on outdoor tobacco control policies; moreover, they may facilitate tobacco control initiatives leading to more smoke-free environments to further protect youth from the harmful effects of tobacco.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies