Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Evaluation of Yersinia pestis Transmission Pathways for Sylvatic Plague in Prairie Dog Populations in the Western U.S.

Tytuł:
Evaluation of Yersinia pestis Transmission Pathways for Sylvatic Plague in Prairie Dog Populations in the Western U.S.
Autorzy:
Richgels KL; United States Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006, Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI, USA.; Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Russell RE; United States Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006, Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI, USA.
Bron GM; United States Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006, Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI, USA.; Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Rocke TE; United States Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006, Schroeder Rd, Madison, WI, USA. .
Źródło:
EcoHealth [Ecohealth] 2016 Jun; Vol. 13 (2), pp. 415-27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 May 27.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Review
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: New York : Springer
MeSH Terms:
Sciuridae*
Plague/*transmission
Yersinia pestis/*pathogenicity
Animals ; Rodent Diseases ; Siphonaptera ; Yersinia pestis/isolation & purification
References:
ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):231-6. (PMID: 21833036)
J Infect Dis. 1979 Oct;140(4):618-21. (PMID: 512421)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 May;62(5):552-60. (PMID: 11289663)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Oct;69(10):5787-92. (PMID: 14532026)
J Wildl Dis. 2014 Jul;50(3):699-702. (PMID: 24807359)
J Wildl Dis. 1989 Oct;25(4):477-80. (PMID: 2810547)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jun;14(6):941-3. (PMID: 18507908)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Jun;8(3):331-7. (PMID: 18447619)
Science. 1958 Apr 11;127(3302):814. (PMID: 13543335)
Vet Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;40(2):1. (PMID: 18803931)
Public Health Rep. 1956 Oct;71(10):979-84. (PMID: 13370794)
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 15;5(1):e3. (PMID: 18198939)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Nov;12(11):948-52. (PMID: 22925020)
Ecohealth. 2013 Sep;10(3):241-5. (PMID: 24057801)
J Wildl Dis. 2008 Jul;44(3):724-30. (PMID: 18689662)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14527-32. (PMID: 21856946)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14247-50. (PMID: 20660742)
J Wildl Dis. 2008 Jul;44(3):731-6. (PMID: 18689663)
J Wildl Dis. 2010 Apr;46(2):356-67. (PMID: 20688629)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;10(4):608-14. (PMID: 15200849)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):27-35. (PMID: 20158329)
J Med Entomol. 2009 Jul;46(4):737-44. (PMID: 19645275)
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Apr 22;266(1421):859-67. (PMID: 10343409)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006 Fall;6(3):231-9. (PMID: 16989561)
Microbiology. 2008 Sep;154(Pt 9):2865-71. (PMID: 18757820)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15380-5. (PMID: 17032761)
J Wildl Dis. 2006 Jan;42(1):74-80. (PMID: 16699150)
J Wildl Dis. 2013 Oct;49(4):920-31. (PMID: 24502719)
Science. 2004 Apr 30;304(5671):736-8. (PMID: 15118163)
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Aug 22;4(15):649-57. (PMID: 17254978)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Apr;9(2):185-90. (PMID: 18945188)
J Med Entomol. 2008 Sep;45(5):933-8. (PMID: 18826038)
Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:505-28. (PMID: 15471529)
J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):807-17. (PMID: 19302321)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Oct;9(5):491-7. (PMID: 18973449)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Jun;8(3):359-67. (PMID: 18454591)
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(5):e1003039. (PMID: 23675291)
J Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 1;191(11):1907-12. (PMID: 15871125)
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2005 Dec;99(8):789-93. (PMID: 16297292)
J Vector Ecol. 2002 Jun;27(1):70-81. (PMID: 12125875)
J Hyg (Lond). 1947 Aug;45(3):371-96. (PMID: 20475778)
Nature. 2008 Jul 31;454(7204):634-7. (PMID: 18668107)
J Wildl Dis. 2006 Jan;42(1):164-9. (PMID: 16699160)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6236-41. (PMID: 16603630)
Mol Microbiol. 2000 Jul;37(2):316-30. (PMID: 10931327)
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22498. (PMID: 21799873)
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46820. (PMID: 23071647)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Nov;61(5):814-21. (PMID: 10586917)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):85-92. (PMID: 20158336)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Sep;5(9):e1319. (PMID: 21931876)
J Wildl Dis. 1988 Apr;24(2):327-33. (PMID: 3373638)
J R Soc Interface. 2011 Jun 6;8(59):776-86. (PMID: 21030428)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Feb;12(2):111-6. (PMID: 21923261)
J Wildl Dis. 2000 Apr;36(2):389-92. (PMID: 10813625)
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Jun;9(3):313-21. (PMID: 19492944)
Ecology. 2009 Nov;90(11):3268-73. (PMID: 19967881)
J Wildl Dis. 1985 Jul;21(3):205-10. (PMID: 4032620)
Ecol Lett. 2012 Jun;15(6):554-60. (PMID: 22449078)
Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:451-73. (PMID: 9017899)
Ecohealth. 2015 Jun;12(2):278-87. (PMID: 25589000)
Ecology. 2013 Jul;94(7):1572-83. (PMID: 23951717)
J Med Entomol. 2007 Jul;44(4):672-7. (PMID: 17695024)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Cynomys; disease ecology; epizootiology; flea; pathogen; vector-borne
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20160529 Date Completed: 20180416 Latest Revision: 20181202
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1007/s10393-016-1133-9
PMID:
27234457
Czasopismo naukowe
Sylvatic plague, caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, is periodically responsible for large die-offs in rodent populations that can spillover and cause human mortalities. In the western US, prairie dog populations experience nearly 100% mortality during plague outbreaks, suggesting that multiple transmission pathways combine to amplify plague dynamics. Several alternate pathways in addition to flea vectors have been proposed, such as transmission via direct contact with bodily fluids or inhalation of infectious droplets, consumption of carcasses, and environmental sources of plague bacteria, such as contaminated soil. However, evidence supporting the ability of these proposed alternate pathways to trigger large-scale epizootics remains elusive. Here we present a short review of potential plague transmission pathways and use an ordinary differential equation model to assess the contribution of each pathway to resulting plague dynamics in black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) and their fleas (Oropsylla hirsuta). Using our model, we found little evidence to suggest that soil contamination was capable of producing plague epizootics in prairie dogs. However, in the absence of flea transmission, direct transmission, i.e., contact with bodily fluids or inhalation of infectious droplets, could produce enzootic dynamics, and transmission via contact with or consumption of carcasses could produce epizootics. This suggests that these pathways warrant further investigation.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies