Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Comparative performance of traps in catching tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Tanzania.

Tytuł :
Comparative performance of traps in catching tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) in Tanzania.
Autorzy :
Malele II; Vector & Vector Borne Disease Institute, Tanga. .
Ouma JO
Nyingilili HS
Kitwika WA
Malulu DJ
Magwisha HB
Kweka EJ
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research [Onderstepoort J Vet Res] 2016 Jun 23; Vol. 83 (1), pp. a1057. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jun 23.
Typ publikacji :
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: Durbanville, Cape Town, South Africa : AOSIS Publishing
Original Publication: Pretoria : Union Of South Africa. Department Of Agricultural Technical Services
MeSH Terms :
Insect Vectors*
Tsetse Flies*
Insect Control/*instrumentation
Animals ; Ecosystem ; Female ; Male ; Tanzania
References :
J Med Entomol. 1993 Sep;30(5):831-42. (PMID: 8254629)
Med Vet Entomol. 1997 Jul;11(3):297-9. (PMID: 9330263)
Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:101-23. (PMID: 15355235)
Trop Med Parasitol. 1986 Mar;37(1):61-6. (PMID: 3704477)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2063. (PMID: 23469299)
J Vector Ecol. 2007 Dec;32(2):263-8. (PMID: 18260516)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012 Jan;6(1):e1501. (PMID: 22303496)
Bull Entomol Res. 2002 Oct;92(5):385-403. (PMID: 12241564)
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2000 Mar;67(1):15-26. (PMID: 10843318)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: tseste; traps; densties; Glossina; mobile; stationary; Tanzania.
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20160707 Date Completed: 20161214 Latest Revision: 20181207
Update Code :
20211220
PubMed Central ID :
PMC6238671
DOI :
10.4102/ojvr.v83i1.1057
PMID :
27380654
Czasopismo naukowe
This study was conducted to determine the efficiency of different tsetse traps in 28 sites across Tanzania. The traps used were biconical, H, NGU, NZI, pyramidal, S3, mobile, and sticky panels. Stationary traps were deployed at a distance of 200 m apart and examined 72 h after deployment. The results showed that 117 (52.2%) out of the 224 traps deployed captured at least one Glossina species. A total of five Glossina species were captured, namely Glossina brevipalpis, Glossina pallidipes, Glossina swynnertoni, Glossina morsitans, and Glossina fuscipes martinii. Biconical traps caught tsetse flies in 27 sites, pyramidal in 26, sticky panel in 20, mobile in 19, S3 in 15, NGU in 7, H in 2 and NZI in 1. A total of 21 107 tsetse flies were trapped, with the most abundant species being G. swynnertoni (55.9%), followed by G. pallidipes (31.1%), G. fuscipes martinii (6.9%) and G. morsitans (6.0%). The least caught was G. brevipalpis (0.2%). The highest number of flies were caught by NGU traps (32.5%), followed by sticky panel (16%), mobile (15.4%), pyramidal (13.0%), biconical (11.3%) and S3 (10.2%). NZI traps managed to catch 0.9% of the total flies and H traps 0.7%. From this study, it can be concluded that the most efficient trap was NGU, followed by sticky panel and mobile, in that order. Therefore, for tsetse fly control programmes, NGU traps could be the better choice. Conversely, of the stationary traps, pyramidal and biconical traps captured tsetse flies in the majority of sites, covering all three ecosystems better than any other traps; therefore, they would be suitable for scouting for tsetse infestation in any given area, thus sparing the costs of making traps for each specific Glossina species.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies