Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Statistical Process Control: A Quality Tool for a Venous Thromboembolic Disease Registry.

Tytuł:
Statistical Process Control: A Quality Tool for a Venous Thromboembolic Disease Registry.
Autorzy:
Posadas-Martinez ML
Rojas LP
Vazquez FJ
De Quiros FB
Waisman GD
Giunta DH
Źródło:
Journal of registry management [J Registry Manag] 2016 Summer; Vol. 43 (2), pp. 82-6.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Observational Study
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Alexandria, VA : National Cancer Registrars Association, Inc.
Original Publication: Lenexa, KS : National Cancer Registrars Association,
MeSH Terms:
Models, Statistical*
Quality Control*
Data Collection/*standards
Registries/*statistics & numerical data
Venous Thromboembolism/*epidemiology
Argentina/epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20160825 Date Completed: 20180424 Latest Revision: 20180424
Update Code:
20240104
PMID:
27556842
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: We aim to describe Statistical Control Process as a quality tool for the Institutional Registry of Venous Thromboembolic Disease (IRTD), a registry developed in a community-care tertiary hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Methods: The IRTD is a prospective cohort. The process of data acquisition began with the creation of a computerized alert generated whenever physicians requested imaging or laboratory study to diagnose venous thromboembolism, which defined eligible patients. The process then followed a structured methodology for patient's inclusion, evaluation, and posterior data entry. To control this process, process performance indicators were designed to be measured monthly. These included the number of eligible patients, the number of included patients, median time to patient's evaluation, and percentage of patients lost to evaluation. Control charts were graphed for each indicator.
Results: The registry was evaluated in 93 months, where 25,757 patients were reported and 6,798 patients met inclusion criteria. The median time to evaluation was 20 hours (SD, 12) and 7.7% of the total was lost to evaluation. Each indicator presented trends over time, caused by structural changes and improvement cycles, and therefore the central limit suffered inflexions.
Conclusion: Statistical process control through process performance indicators allowed us to control the performance of the registry over time to detect systematic problems. We postulate that this approach could be reproduced for other clinical registries.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies