Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Down for the count: Cryptosporidium infection depletes the gut microbiome in Coquerel's sifakas.

Tytuł:
Down for the count: Cryptosporidium infection depletes the gut microbiome in Coquerel's sifakas.
Autorzy:
McKenney EA; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Greene LK; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Drea CM; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Yoder AD; Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.; University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.; Duke Lemur Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Źródło:
Microbial ecology in health and disease [Microb Ecol Health Dis] 2017 Jun 15; Vol. 28 (1), pp. 1335165. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 15 (Print Publication: 2017).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2016-2018 : Philadelphia, PA : Taylor & Francis
Original Publication: Chichester [Sussex] ; New York : Wiley, c1988-
References:
Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60. (PMID: 21702898)
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 May 1;40(2):107-12. (PMID: 19709217)
J Infect Dis. 1997 Jan;175(1):218-21. (PMID: 8985225)
Cell. 2016 Nov 17;167(5):1339-1353.e21. (PMID: 27863247)
Gut Pathog. 2013 Feb 01;5(1):1. (PMID: 23369162)
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2010 Sep;41(3):438-44. (PMID: 20945641)
Trends Biochem Sci. 2014 Apr;39(4):156-8. (PMID: 24613530)
BMC Microbiol. 2013 Dec 11;13:289. (PMID: 24325678)
ISME J. 2011 Feb;5(2):169-72. (PMID: 20827291)
Primates. 2010 Jan;51(1):87-90. (PMID: 19882210)
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2420-8. (PMID: 20648002)
Infect Immun. 1992 Sep;60(9):3509-12. (PMID: 1500156)
Science. 2012 Jun 8;336(6086):1325-9. (PMID: 22582016)
Gastroenterology. 2015 May;148(6):1107-19. (PMID: 25575570)
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;44(8):529-30. (PMID: 20601895)
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013 Apr;24(2):160-8. (PMID: 22940212)
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(1-2):85-95. (PMID: 26022304)
AIDS. 2011 Mar 13;25(5):549-60. (PMID: 21160413)
Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):R89. (PMID: 25146375)
DNA Res. 2007 Aug 31;14(4):169-81. (PMID: 17916580)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Nov;58(11):3494-500. (PMID: 1482175)
Gigascience. 2015 Sep 14;4:42. (PMID: 26380076)
Ageing Res Rev. 2012 Jan;11(1):150-62. (PMID: 21802530)
Science. 2015 Nov 6;350(6261):663-6. (PMID: 26542567)
Int J Parasitol. 2015 Jul;45(8):567-73. (PMID: 25913477)
Trends Microbiol. 2012 Oct;20(10):467-76. (PMID: 22902802)
BMC Genomics. 2010 May 26;11:332. (PMID: 20504335)
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;14(1):82-91. (PMID: 21036098)
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;15(1):85-94. (PMID: 25278220)
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 May;47(5):548-52. (PMID: 22468996)
Microb Ecol. 2011 Jan;61(1):123-33. (PMID: 20734040)
Gut. 2011 May;60(5):631-7. (PMID: 21209126)
Genome Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1974-84. (PMID: 22665442)
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6. (PMID: 20383131)
Gut Pathog. 2013 Aug 30;5(1):26. (PMID: 23991642)
Vet Parasitol. 2004 Dec 9;126(1-2):37-56. (PMID: 15567578)
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;27(1):127-37. (PMID: 23768558)
MBio. 2015 May 19;6(3):e00381-15. (PMID: 25991682)
Cell Host Microbe. 2014 Mar 12;15(3):382-392. (PMID: 24629344)
Front Microbiol. 2015 Feb 18;6:130. (PMID: 25741335)
PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0124618. (PMID: 25970595)
Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2004 Oct;15(4):253-9. (PMID: 15494949)
Vet Parasitol. 2003 Feb 27;111(4):297-307. (PMID: 12559709)
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1. (PMID: 20709691)
Nat Immunol. 2013 Jul;14(7):676-84. (PMID: 23778795)
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;40(3):235-43. (PMID: 16633129)
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;28 Suppl 4:9-17. (PMID: 24251697)
Gut. 2016 Jan;65(1):57-62. (PMID: 26069274)
Genes Brain Behav. 2006 Mar;5(2):120-30. (PMID: 16507003)
Nature. 2014 Nov 20;515(7527):423-6. (PMID: 25231861)
Nature. 2013 Jan 3;493(7430):45-50. (PMID: 23222524)
PLoS Pathog. 2010 Sep 09;6(9):e1001097. (PMID: 20844578)
Am J Primatol. 2000 Nov;52(3):133-42. (PMID: 11078027)
Am J Primatol. 2004 Nov;64(3):309-21. (PMID: 15538763)
Mol Cell Probes. 2007 Apr;21(2):92-6. (PMID: 17011748)
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(10):e1002933. (PMID: 23055923)
Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):228-33. (PMID: 10821283)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Enteric infection; gut microbiota; lemur; protozoan pathogen; strepsirrhine primate
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20170726 Latest Revision: 20200930
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC5508644
DOI:
10.1080/16512235.2017.1335165
PMID:
28740461
Czasopismo naukowe
Background : The gut microbiome (GMB) is the first line of defense against enteric pathogens, which are a leading cause of disease and mortality worldwide. One such pathogen, the protozoan Cryptosporidium , causes a variety of digestive disorders that can be devastating and even lethal. The Coquerel's sifaka ( Propithecus coquereli ) - an endangered, folivorous primate endemic to Madagascar - is precariously susceptible to cryptosporidiosis under captive conditions. If left untreated, infection can rapidly advance to morbidity and death. Objective : To gain a richer understanding of the pathophysiology of this pathogen while also improving captive management of endangered species, we examine the impact of cryptosporidiosis on the GMB of a flagship species known to experience a debilitating disease state upon infection. Design : Using 16S sequencing of DNA extracted from sifaka fecal samples, we compared the microbial communities of healthy sifakas to those of infected individuals, across infection and recovery periods. Results : Over the course of infection, we found that the sifaka GMB responds with decreased microbial diversity and increased community dissimilarity. Compared to the GMB of unaffected individuals, as well as during pre-infection and recovery periods, the GMB during active infection was enriched for microbial taxa associated with dysbiosis and rapid transit time. Time to recovery was inversely related to age, with young animals being slowest to recover GMB diversity and full community membership. Antimicrobial treatment during infection caused a significant depletion in GMB diversity. Conclusions : Although individual sifakas show unique trajectories of microbial loss and recolonization in response to infection, recovering sifakas exhibit remarkably consistent patterns, similar to initial community assembly of the GMB in infants. This observation, in particular, provides biological insight into the rules by which the GMB recovers from the disease state. Fecal transfaunation may prove effective in restoring a healthy GMB in animals with specialized diets.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies