Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Development and testing of the KERNset: an instrument to assess the quality of telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care services.

Tytuł:
Development and testing of the KERNset: an instrument to assess the quality of telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care services.
Autorzy:
Smits M; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .
Keizer E; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ram P; Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Giesen P; Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), P.O Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Źródło:
BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2017 Dec 02; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 798. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 02.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
MeSH Terms:
Telephone*
After-Hours Care/*standards
Primary Health Care/*standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care/*methods
Triage/*standards
Communication ; Humans ; Netherlands ; Observer Variation ; Pilot Projects ; Primary Health Care/methods ; Surveys and Questionnaires
References:
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):174-8. (PMID: 18845413)
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):181-4. (PMID: 17545343)
N Z Med J. 2005 Oct 28;118(1224):U1693. (PMID: 16258573)
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Jun;20(6):367-72. (PMID: 15179144)
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3972-81. (PMID: 22764084)
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):942-6. (PMID: 14960218)
Fam Pract. 2011 Jun;28(3):334-41. (PMID: 21106645)
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10 ):737-742. (PMID: 28418455)
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;26(4):373-9. (PMID: 23833151)
Fam Pract. 2012 Oct;29(5):547-52. (PMID: 22327415)
Acta Clin Belg. 2015 Oct;70(5):309-14. (PMID: 25819448)
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Dec;29(4):198-209. (PMID: 22126218)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 10;10:335. (PMID: 21143949)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: After-hours; Instrument; Primary care; Quality; Triage
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20171204 Date Completed: 20180614 Latest Revision: 20181113
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC5712191
DOI:
10.1186/s12913-017-2686-1
PMID:
29197376
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Telephone triage is a core but vulnerable part of the care process at out-of-hours general practitioner (GP) cooperatives. In the Netherlands, different instruments have been used for assessing the quality of telephone triage. These instruments focussed mainly on communicational aspects, and less on the medical quality of triage decisions. Our aim was to develop and test a minimum set of items to assess the quality of telephone triage.
Methods: A national survey among all GP cooperatives in the Netherlands was performed to examine the most important aspects of telephone triage. Next, corresponding items from existing instruments were searched on these topics. Subsequently, an expert panel judged these items on importance, completeness and formulation. The concept KERNset consisted of 24 items about the telephone conversation: 13 medical, ten communicational and one regarding both types. It was pilot tested on measurement characteristics, reliability, validity and variation between triagists. In this pilot study, 114 anonymous calls from four GP cooperatives spread across the Netherlands were judged by three out of eight raters, both internal and external raters.
Results: Cronbach's alpha was .94 for the medical items and .75 for the communicational items. Inter-rater reliability: complete agreement between the external raters was 45% and reasonable agreement 73% (difference of maximally one point on the five-point scale). Intra-rater reliability: complete agreement within raters was 55% and reasonable agreement 84%. There were hardly any differences between internal and external raters, but there were differences in strictness between individual raters. The construct validity was confirmed by the high correlation between the general impression of the call and the items of the KERNset. Of the differences within items 19% could be explained by differences between triage nurses, which means the KERNset is able to demonstrate differences between triage nurses.
Conclusions: The KERNset can be used to assess the quality of telephone triage. The validity is good and differences between calls and between triage nurses can be measured. A more intensive training for raters could improve the reliability.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies