Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe.

Tytuł:
Composing lexical versus functional adjectives: Evidence for uniformity in the left temporal lobe.
Autorzy:
Zhang L; Department of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA. .; New York University Shanghai, 1555 Century Avenue, Shanghai, 200122, China. .
Pylkkänen L; Department of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA.; Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.; New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Źródło:
Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2018 Dec; Vol. 25 (6), pp. 2309-2322.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
MeSH Terms:
Magnetoencephalography*
Psycholinguistics*
Semantics*
Comprehension/*physiology
Dominance, Cerebral/*physiology
Temporal Lobe/*physiology
Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention/physiology ; Color Perception/physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Size Perception/physiology ; Young Adult
References:
Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):61-73. (PMID: 10050895)
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2801-14. (PMID: 21414902)
Neuron. 2000 Apr;26(1):55-67. (PMID: 10798392)
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60. (PMID: 24161808)
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):433-40. (PMID: 12930473)
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6. (PMID: 9176952)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2000 Feb;9(2):65-71. (PMID: 10680763)
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Mar;46(3):245-59. (PMID: 10097460)
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Fall;5(4):467-79. (PMID: 23964919)
Neuroimage. 1999 May;9(5):516-25. (PMID: 10329291)
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:62-88. (PMID: 20392276)
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 12;8(9):e73949. (PMID: 24069253)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87. (PMID: 18026167)
Neuroreport. 1998 Sep 14;9(13):2995-9. (PMID: 9804304)
Brain Lang. 2015 Feb;141:124-34. (PMID: 25585277)
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:267. (PMID: 24431986)
Neuroreport. 2001 Jun 13;12(8):1749-52. (PMID: 11409752)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Feb;15(2):80-94. (PMID: 11835600)
Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):638-46. (PMID: 20600969)
Ann Neurol. 1990 Mar;27(3):226-31. (PMID: 2327733)
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90. (PMID: 17517438)
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3276-84. (PMID: 25698762)
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1139-48. (PMID: 22248581)
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):11-21. (PMID: 15109993)
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):924-32. (PMID: 17500009)
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80. (PMID: 16530430)
Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):286-8. (PMID: 27418508)
Neuroscientist. 2013 Feb;19(1):43-61. (PMID: 22547530)
Brain. 1992 Dec;115 ( Pt 6):1753-68. (PMID: 1486459)
Neuroimage. 2013 May 1;71:175-86. (PMID: 23333416)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Nov;25(11):1824-50. (PMID: 23859646)
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;57:59-70. (PMID: 24631260)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):665-79. (PMID: 16768368)
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:161-171. (PMID: 27297726)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):643-56. (PMID: 18052788)
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994 Jan;32(1):35-42. (PMID: 8182960)
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42. (PMID: 9176953)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):527-36. (PMID: 22001867)
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 May;30(3):339-64. (PMID: 11523278)
Brain. 1992 Dec;115 ( Pt 6):1783-806. (PMID: 1486461)
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1320-36. (PMID: 15050558)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):131-142. (PMID: 22642711)
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 16;6:1739. (PMID: 26635655)
J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16809-17. (PMID: 21159952)
Brain Lang. 1996 Mar;52(3):452-73. (PMID: 8653390)
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Aug;23(8):1859-73. (PMID: 22735156)
Ann Neurol. 2000 Jan;47(1):36-45. (PMID: 10632099)
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:176-89. (PMID: 25582406)
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Mar;11(3):223-37. (PMID: 11230094)
Neuroimage. 2001 Jun;13(6 Pt 1):1053-64. (PMID: 11352611)
Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):604-8. (PMID: 9121583)
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Nov;20(11):2728-38. (PMID: 20190005)
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Apr;29(3):381-389. (PMID: 24610968)
Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5. (PMID: 8455719)
Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:228-40. (PMID: 25703829)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):550-60. (PMID: 12126497)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2522-7. (PMID: 21224415)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Oct 06;2:14. (PMID: 18958214)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14792-7. (PMID: 9405692)
Brain Lang. 2009 Dec;111(3):161-72. (PMID: 19815267)
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):194-203. (PMID: 26325329)
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:19-31. (PMID: 27908787)
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 04;5:524. (PMID: 24926273)
Brain Lang. 2016 Sep;160:50-60. (PMID: 27475469)
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Oct;26(2):128-38. (PMID: 15895428)
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:131-143. (PMID: 28450204)
Science. 1996 Oct 4;274(5284):114-6. (PMID: 8810246)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Nov;19(11):1753-67. (PMID: 17958479)
Grant Information:
BCS-1221723 National Science Foundation; G1001 NYUAD Institute
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Language comprehension; Neuropsychology; Psycholinguistics; Semantics
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20180426 Date Completed: 20190207 Latest Revision: 20190426
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.3758/s13423-018-1469-y
PMID:
29693207
Czasopismo naukowe
Featural information (e.g., color or shape) allows interlocutors to focus their attention on the specific items under discussion from the vast set of possibilities in the environment. Intriguingly, when they are used to modify and restrict nouns, adjectives can either carry featural information themselves (e.g., green car) or retrieve featural information from the context (e.g., somebody points at a car and claims that she has the same car or a different car). Do the processing of same/different car and green car share neural correlates? For the composition of nouns with feature-carrying adjectives, prior work revealed early compositional effects (roughly 200 ms after noun onset) in the left anterior temporal lobe. However, although we know that such effects do not extend to cases of numeral quantification, which add no conceptual features to the noun (e.g., two boats), we do not know whether they extend to functional adjectives that themselves introduce no features, but instead reference features in the context. To address this question, we measured magnetoencephalography (MEG) during the processing of five types of noun phrases (NPs): same NPs (e.g., same star), different NPs (e.g., different star), color NPs (e.g., green star), comparative NPs (e.g., larger star), and another NPs (e.g., another star). Our main finding was that between 185 to 240 ms after noun onset, same and different NPs patterned with the color NPs in their elicited left temporal lobe activity, and same NPs even trended toward higher amplitudes than the color NPs. This shows that the mechanism driving combinatory effects in the left temporal cortex does not require the input words to directly name conceptual features, as long as the words reference featural information in the context, and that overlapping neural correlates underlie the composition of featural information from both linguistic and nonlinguistic sources.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies