-
Tytuł:
-
Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.
-
Autorzy:
-
Wee IJY; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.; Division of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Syn NL; Division of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Shabbir A; Division of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Kim G; Division of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
So JBY; Division of General Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. jimmy_.; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. jimmy_.
-
Źródło:
-
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [Gastric Cancer] 2019 May; Vol. 22 (3), pp. 423-434. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 25.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Original Publication: Tokyo : Springer-Verlag Tokyo, c1998-
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Postoperative Complications*
Standard of Care*
Gastrectomy/*mortality
Laparoscopy/*mortality
Length of Stay/*statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission/*statistics & numerical data
Stomach Neoplasms/*surgery
Humans ; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Prognosis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recovery of Function ; Survival Rate
-
References:
-
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jul;44(7):942-6. (PMID: 11496073)
J Nippon Med Sch. 2003 Jun;70(3):263-9. (PMID: 12928729)
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Mar;47(3):271-7; discussion 277-8. (PMID: 14991487)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13. (PMID: 15840177)
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Oct 1;45(19):1314-7. (PMID: 18241563)
Gastric Cancer. 2008;11(2):81-5. (PMID: 18595014)
Int J Surg. 2009 Feb;7(1):16-9. (PMID: 19110478)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;12(5):462-6. (PMID: 19742334)
Arch Surg. 2009 Oct;144(10):961-9. (PMID: 19841366)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Apr;14(4):620-7. (PMID: 20108171)
Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;29(4):434-40. (PMID: 20116145)
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. (PMID: 20171303)
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 May-Jun;34(3):313-21. (PMID: 20467014)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD007635. (PMID: 21328298)
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):34-41. (PMID: 21573918)
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1045-51. (PMID: 21985180)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1830-9. (PMID: 22854954)
World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2879-87. (PMID: 22941233)
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;107(3):230-6. (PMID: 23129495)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):225-31, 233; discussion 232-3. (PMID: 23244257)
Br J Surg. 2013 Jul;100(8):1015-24. (PMID: 23696477)
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 21;19(23):3642-8. (PMID: 23801867)
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):319-28. (PMID: 23969801)
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):85-92. (PMID: 24337792)
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):50-5. (PMID: 24518775)
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 14;20(2):578-83. (PMID: 24574728)
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):653-60. (PMID: 24668391)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 May;17(5):489-91. (PMID: 24859962)
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jul;10(3):132-8. (PMID: 25013329)
Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1209-29. (PMID: 25047143)
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3142-51. (PMID: 25228170)
Surgery. 2014 Oct;156(4):949-56. (PMID: 25239351)
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13692-704. (PMID: 25320507)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. (PMID: 25651787)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1391-8. (PMID: 25943912)
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:46-54. (PMID: 26004350)
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. (PMID: 26352529)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):137-43. (PMID: 26525694)
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 21;21(47):13339-44. (PMID: 26715818)
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1350-7. (PMID: 26903580)
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1645-54. (PMID: 26956905)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;19(3):269-73. (PMID: 27003645)
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jun 02;9:3345-51. (PMID: 27330314)
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):210-217. (PMID: 27554250)
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):959-964. (PMID: 27875094)
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 20;8(43):75699-75711. (PMID: 29088903)
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 23;15(1):207. (PMID: 29169362)
Surgeon. 2018 Jun;16(3):183-192. (PMID: 29337046)
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1843-1852. (PMID: 29352586)
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):17. (PMID: 29373978)
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 22;16(1):62. (PMID: 29566715)
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 14;24(14):1562-1578. (PMID: 29662294)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(11):3231-3238. (PMID: 30051365)
Gastric Cancer. 2019 May;22(3):598-606. (PMID: 30284080)
Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. (PMID: 7891489)
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: ERAS; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Gastric cancer; Gastric surgery
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20190227 Date Completed: 20190903 Latest Revision: 20200225
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
DOI:
-
10.1007/s10120-019-00937-9
-
PMID:
-
30805742
-
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been successfully integrated into peri-operative management of different cancer surgeries such as colorectal cancer. Their value for gastric cancer surgery, however, remains uncertain.
Methods: A search for randomized and observational studies comparing ERAS versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses with inverse variance weighting were conducted, and quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (PROSPERO: CRD42017080888).
Results: Twenty-three studies involving 2686 patients were included. ERAS was associated with reduced length of hospital stay (WMD-2.47 days, 95% CI - 3.06 to - 1.89, P < 0.00001), time to flatus (WMD-0.70 days, 95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.37, P < 0.0001), and hospitalization costs (WMD-USD$ 4400, 95% CI - USD$ 5580 to - USD$ 3210, P < 0.00001), with consistent results across open and laparoscopic surgery. Postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality were similar, although a higher rate of readmission was observed in the ERAS group (RR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.67, P = 0.04). Patients in the ERAS arm had significantly attenuated C-reactive protein levels on days 3/4 and 7, interleukin-6 levels on days 1, and 3/4, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels on days 3/4 postoperatively.
Conclusion: Compared to conventional care, ERAS reduces hospital stay, costs, surgical stress response and time to return of gut function, without increasing post-operative morbidity in gastric cancer surgery. However, precaution is necessary to reduce the increased risk of hospital readmission when adopting ERAS.