Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Improving perceptions of patient safety through standardizing handoffs from the emergency department to the inpatient setting: a systematic review.

Tytuł:
Improving perceptions of patient safety through standardizing handoffs from the emergency department to the inpatient setting: a systematic review.
Autorzy:
Alimenti D; University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing AG-ACNP-MSN, Philadelphia, PA.
Buydos S
Cunliffe L
Hunt A
Źródło:
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners [J Am Assoc Nurse Pract] 2019 Jun 05; Vol. 31 (6), pp. 354-363.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Systematic Review
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2018- : Netherlands : Wolters Kluwer
Original Publication: Malden : Wiley
MeSH Terms:
Patient Handoff*
Reference Standards*
Patient Safety/*standards
Patient Transfer/*methods
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration ; Humans ; Patient Transfer/standards ; Perception
References:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). Patient safety network: Handoffs and signouts. Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/9/handoffs-and-signouts.
Balhara K. S., Peterson S. M., Elabd M. M., Regan L., Anton X., Al-Natour B. A., Stewart de Ramirez S. A. (2017). Implementing standardized, inter-unit communication in an international setting: Handoff of patients from emergency medicine to internal medicine. Journal of International Emergency Medicine, 13, 385–395.
Gonzalo J. D., Yang J. J., Stuckey H. L., Fischer C. M., Sanchez L. D., Herzig S. J. (2014). Patient care transitions from the emergency department to the medicine ward: Evaluation of a standardized electronic signout tool. International Journal for Quality in HealthCare, 24, 337–347.
Horwitz L. I., Moin T., Krumholz H. M., Wang L., Bradley E. H. (2008). Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168, 1755–1760.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Landrigan C., Lyons A. (2012). I-PASS: Development of an evidence-based handoff improvement program for physicians and nurses. Retrieved from https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/07/pv/qps-december-2012.pdf.
Marmor G. O., Li M. Y. (2017). Improving emergency department medical clinical handover: Barriers at the bedside. Emergency Medicine Australia, 29, 297–302.
Maughan B. C., Lei L., Cydulka R. K. (2011). ED handoffs: Observed practices and communication errors. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 29, 502–511.
Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097.
Mueller S., Patel R., O'Toole J., Schnipper J. (2016) Best practices in inpatient handoffs of care. Hospital Medicine Clinics, 5, 518–528.
National Quality Forum. (2012). National voluntary consensus standards for patient safety measures: a consensus report. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/06/National_Voluntary_Consensus_Standards_for_Patient_Safety_Measures__A_Consensus_Report.aspx.
Newhouse R. P., Dearholt S. L., Poe S. S., Pugh L. C., White K. M. (2007). The Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice model and guidelines. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Riesenberg L. A. (2012). Shift-to-shift handoff research: Where do we go from here? Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4, 4–8.
Smith C. J., Buzalko R. J., Anderson N., Michalski J., Warchol J., Ducey S., Branecki C. E. (2018). Evaluation of a novel handoff communication strategy for patients admitted from the emergency department. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19, 372–379.
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare. (2017). Sentinel event alert. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_58_Hand_off_Comms_9_6_17_FINAL_(1).pdf.
The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare. (2018). Targeted solutions tool for hand-off communications. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission. Retrieved from https://www.centerfortransforminghealthcare.org/tst_hoc.aspx.
The World Health Organization. (2006). The WHO collaborating centre on patient safety (solutions), the world alliance for patient safety and the commonwealth fund announce action on patient safety (High 5s) initiative. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/news/High_5_Release.pdf.
The World Health Organization. (2014). The high 5s project interim report. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/solutions/high5s/High5_InterimReport.pdf.
The World Health Organization. (2018). Patient safety. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/patient-safety/patient-safety.
Tufanaru C., Munn Z., Aromataris E., Campbell J., Hopp L. (2017). Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In Aromataris E., Munn Z. (Eds.). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. Retrieved from: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/.
Zhan C., Miller M. R. (2003). Administrative data based patient safety research: A critical review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 12, ii58-ii63.
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20190305 Date Completed: 20190930 Latest Revision: 20210915
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1097/JXX.0000000000000160
PMID:
30829973
Czasopismo naukowe
Background and Purpose: Patient handoffs have long been identified as a potentially challenging time for patients because poor communication produces numerous complications. This is especially true with regards to patient care handoffs between areas such as the emergency department (ED) and inpatient setting. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze existing literature pertaining to standardized handoffs between the ED and inpatient setting and its effect on perceived patient safety to guide future research, clinical practice, and patient safety.
Methods: A review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were selected using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria: primary research and patient handoff from the ED to the inpatient setting. Quality assessment of the studies was completed using The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool.
Conclusion: Existing studies demonstrate the potential for increased perception of patient safety as well as provider satisfaction when appropriate staff education and standardized handoff tools are implemented. There is a lack of data on the standardization of handoff tools between the ED and inpatient setting and their impact on perceived patient safety.
Implications for Practice: The combination of provider education and implementation of standardized handoff tools in the ED positively affects perceptions of patient safety and provider satisfaction. Hospital administrations should strongly consider incorporating standardized handoff tools into practice.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies