Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Validation of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire in women with endometriosis.

Tytuł:
Validation of the Sexual Activity Questionnaire in women with endometriosis.
Autorzy:
Oppenheimer A; EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.; Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital universitaire Antoine Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte de Trivaux, Clamart, France.
Panel P; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France.
Rouquette A; CESP, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, Faculté de Médecine UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.; AP-HP, Bicêtre Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Public Health and Epidemiology Department, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
du Cheyron J; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Deffieux X; EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital universitaire Antoine-Béclère, AP-HP, Clamart, France.
Fauconnier A; EA 7285 Research Unit 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health', Versailles-Saint-Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.
Źródło:
Human reproduction (Oxford, England) [Hum Reprod] 2019 May 01; Vol. 34 (5), pp. 824-833.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Observational Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Study
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press
Original Publication: Oxford ; Washington, DC : Published for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology by IRL Press, [c1986-
MeSH Terms:
Patient Reported Outcome Measures*
Quality of Life*
Endometriosis/*therapy
Sexual Behavior/*psychology
Adult ; Endometriosis/complications ; Endometriosis/psychology ; Endometrium/surgery ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Libido/drug effects ; Progestins/administration & dosage ; Progestins/adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Psychometrics/methods ; Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: endometriosis; minimally important difference; responsiveness; sexual activity questionnaire; sexual quality of life
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Progestins)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20190417 Date Completed: 20200701 Latest Revision: 20200701
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1093/humrep/dez037
PMID:
30989214
Czasopismo naukowe
Study Question: Is the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) a valid tool for patients treated for symptomatic endometriosis?
Summary Answer: For women having surgical treatment for endometriosis, we determined that the SAQ is a valid and responsive tool.
What Is Known Already: Endometriosis adversely affects sexual quality of life. Suitable validated sexual quality of life instruments for endometriosis are lacking both in clinical practice and for research.
Study, Design, Size, Duration: A total of 367 women with proven endometriosis undergoing medical or surgical treatment were included in an observational study conducted between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2014 in two French tertiary care centers. Both hospitals are reference centers for endometriosis treatment. Of these 367 women, 267 were sexually active and constituted the baseline population.
Particpants/materials, Settings, Methods: Women >18 years old with histological or radiological proven endometriosis, consulting for painful symptoms of at least 3 months duration, infertility, or other symptoms (bleeding, cysts) were invited to complete self-administered questionnaires before (T0) and 12 months after treatment (T1). Tests of data quality included descriptive statistics of the data, missing data levels, floor and ceiling effects, structural validity and internal consistency.The construct validity was obtained by testing presupposed relationships between previously established SAQ scores and prespecified characteristics of the patients by comparing different subgroups of patients at T0. Sensitivity to change was subsequently calculated by comparing the SAQ score between T1 and T0 overall and for different subgroups of treatment. Effect sizes (to T1) were calculated according to Cohen's method. The minimally important difference was estimated by a step-wise triangulation approach (including anchor-based method).
Main Results and the Role of Chance: In total, 267 sexually active patients (204 surgical and 63 medical treatment) completed the SAQ at T0 and 136 (50.9%) at T1. The SAQ score ranged from 2.0 to 28.0 (mean ± SD: 16.8 ± 5.7).The SAQ score was one-dimensional according to the scree plot with good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.81) and had good discriminative ability according to pain descriptors and quality of life in endometriosis. The SAQ was responsive in patients treated by surgery but the effect size was low (0.3, 95% CI (0.0-0.6), P = 0.01). The minimally important difference was determined at 2.2.
Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The effect size for medical treatment was non-significant. Other effect sizes were low but statistically significant. This could be explained by lower libido due to progestin intake, which was used for both surgically and medically treated patients.
Wider Implications of the Findings: The SAQ is easy to use, valid and effective in assessing sexual quality of life in patients with endometriosis. This patient-reported score could be used as a primary outcome for future clinical studies. The minimally important difference estimation will be useful for future research. We recommend using 2.2 for the minimally important difference of the SAQ.
Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This work was funded by the 'Direction à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation' of Versailles, France and the 'Institut de Recherche en Santé de la Femme' (IRSF). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies