Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.

Tytuł:
A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.
Autorzy:
Usami S; Center for Research and Development on Transition from Secondary to Higher Education.
Murayama K; Department of Psychology, University of Reading.
Hamaker EL; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University.
Źródło:
Psychological methods [Psychol Methods] 2019 Oct; Vol. 24 (5), pp. 637-657. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 18.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, c1996-
MeSH Terms:
Data Interpretation, Statistical*
Human Development*
Individuality*
Longitudinal Studies*
Models, Statistical*
Psychology/*methods
Humans
Grant Information:
JSPS Kakenhi; Leverhulme Trust
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20190419 Date Completed: 20200219 Latest Revision: 20200219
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1037/met0000210
PMID:
30998041
Czasopismo naukowe
Inferring reciprocal effects or causality between variables is a central aim of behavioral and psychological research. To address reciprocal effects, a variety of longitudinal models that include cross-lagged relations have been proposed in different contexts and disciplines. However, the relations between these cross-lagged models have not been systematically discussed in the literature. This lack of insight makes it difficult for researchers to select an appropriate model when analyzing longitudinal data, and some researchers do not even think about alternative cross-lagged models. The present research provides a unified framework that clarifies the conceptual and mathematical similarities and differences between these models. The unified framework shows that existing longitudinal models can be effectively classified based on whether the model posits unique factors and/or dynamic residuals and what types of common factors are used to model changes. The latter is essential to understand how cross-lagged parameters are interpreted. We also present an example using empirical data to demonstrate that there is great risk of drawing different conclusions depending on the cross-lagged models used. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies