Validation of self-reported occupational noise exposure in participants of a French case-control study on acoustic neuroma.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Validation of self-reported occupational noise exposure in participants of a French case-control study on acoustic neuroma.
Autorzy:: Deltour I; Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon Cedex 08, France. .
Massardier-Pilonchery A; University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and IFSTTAR, Transport Work and Environmental Epidemiology Research and Surveillance Unit, UMRESTTE (UMR 14T9405), 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 08, France.; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Schlehofer B; Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon Cedex 08, France.; Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany.
Schlaefer K; Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hours M; University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and IFSTTAR, Transport Work and Environmental Epidemiology Research and Surveillance Unit, UMRESTTE (UMR 14T9405), 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69373, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Schüz J; Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Źródło:: International archives of occupational and environmental health [Int Arch Occup Environ Health] 2019 Oct; Vol. 92 (7), pp. 991-1001. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 26.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article; Validation Study
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Original Publication: Berlin, New York : Springer-Verlag.
MeSH Terms:: Noise, Occupational/*statistics & numerical data
Occupational Exposure/*analysis
Self Report/*standards
Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuroma, Acoustic/epidemiology ; Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data
References:: Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Feb;19(1):19-21. (PMID: 8174295)
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jul;55(6):601-11. (PMID: 21511891)
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Jun 19;30(4):521-535. (PMID: 28584326)
Hear Res. 1984 Mar;13(3):229-47. (PMID: 6735931)
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Sep;69(9):643-50. (PMID: 22693267)
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Sep;59(9):575-93; discussion 594. (PMID: 12205230)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(9):647-64. (PMID: 17636416)
Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-32. (PMID: 24183105)
J Laryngol Otol. 1990 Mar;104(3):270-4. (PMID: 2341791)
Occup Environ Med. 2011 Jan;68(1):4-9. (PMID: 20798009)
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May 23;46(1):41. (PMID: 28535812)
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 1;180(1):58-67. (PMID: 24786799)
Hear Res. 2003 Apr;178(1-2):70-8. (PMID: 12684179)
Hear Res. 2002 Feb;164(1-2):29-38. (PMID: 11950522)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):930-3. (PMID: 19018927)
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Oct;55(5):321-32. (PMID: 17851009)
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jul;81(7):837-44. (PMID: 17972095)
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004 Jul;207(3):227-34. (PMID: 15330390)
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 May;60(4):421-31. (PMID: 26764244)
Br J Cancer. 1989 May;59(5):783-6. (PMID: 2736213)
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Jul;66(7):480-6. (PMID: 19289391)
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jul;43(11):1741-7. (PMID: 17600696)
Laryngoscope. 1981 Mar;91(3):363-71. (PMID: 7464397)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(8):469-75. (PMID: 19543796)
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1969-85. (PMID: 25080530)
Scand Audiol. 1983;12(4):247-50. (PMID: 6229870)
Noise Health. 2004 Jan-Mar;6(22):5-13. (PMID: 15070524)
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb 15;163(4):327-33. (PMID: 16357108)
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):282-8. (PMID: 24334241)
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec 1;166(11):1252-8. (PMID: 17804860)
Noise Health. 2006 Apr-Jun;8(31):80-7. (PMID: 17687183)
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Jul;57(6):774-83. (PMID: 23380283)
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:35-53. (PMID: 9611611)
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):351-72. (PMID: 26249711)
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;22(5):388-93. (PMID: 25188429)
Grant Information:: 001 International WHO_ World Health Organization
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: Case–control study; Data validity; Expert assessment; Exposure misclassification; Occupational self-reported noise exposure; Recall bias
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20190428 Date Completed: 20200406 Latest Revision: 20240324
Update Code:: 20240324
DOI:: 10.1007/s00420-019-01427-2
PMID:: 31028471
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

Objectives: To validate self-reported occupational loud noise exposure against expert evaluation of noise levels in a French case-control study on acoustic neuroma and to estimate the impact of exposure misclassification on risk estimation.
Methods: Noise levels were evaluated in 1006 jobs held by 111 cases and 217 population controls by an expert. Case-control differences in self-reporting were analyzed with logistic models. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and observed agreement of the self-reports were computed relative to the expert evaluation. They were used to calibrate the odds ratio (OR) between lifetime ever occupational loud noise exposure and the risk of acoustic neuroma, without adjustment for measurement error of the expert assessments.
Results: Cases reported noise levels in individual jobs closer to the expert assessment than controls, but the case-control difference was small for lifetime exposures. For expert-rated exposure of 80 dB(A), reporting of individual jobs by cases was more sensitive (54% in cases, 37% in controls), whereas specificity (91% in cases, 93% in controls) and observed agreement (82% in cases, 81% in controls) were similar. When lifetime exposure was considered, sensitivity increased (76% in cases, 65% in controls), while cases specificity decreased (84%). When these values were used to calibrate self-reports for exposure misclassification compared to expert evaluation at 80 dB(A), the crude OR of 1.7 was reduced to 1.3.
Conclusions: Despite the relatively accurate reporting of loud noise, the impact of the calibration on the OR was non-negligible.

Informacja