Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

The effect of implementing the partners for change outcome management system in a nationwide student counseling service.

Tytuł:
The effect of implementing the partners for change outcome management system in a nationwide student counseling service.
Autorzy:
Østergård OK; Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences.
O'Toole MS; Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences.
Svendsen MM; Student Counseling Service.
Hougaard E; Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences.
Źródło:
Journal of counseling psychology [J Couns Psychol] 2020 Jan; Vol. 67 (1), pp. 90-103. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 30.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Washington Dc : American Psychological Association
Original Publication: Columbus, Ohio.
MeSH Terms:
Self Report*
Counseling/*methods
Counselors/*psychology
Student Health Services/*methods
Students/*psychology
Adult ; Counseling/trends ; Counselors/trends ; Denmark/epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Student Health Services/trends ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20190531 Date Completed: 20200324 Latest Revision: 20200324
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1037/cou0000353
PMID:
31144845
Czasopismo naukowe
The aims of the present study were to investigate the effect of implementing the Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) in the Danish Student Counseling Service and to explore both between-condition moderators and within-condition predictors of outcomes. The study was a nonrandomized controlled study, comparing the outcome of individual and group student counseling for 634 PCOMS clients to that of 740 clients having started treatment as usual (TAU) 2 years before the PCOMS data collection began. The primary outcome measure was the Global Severity Index on the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised. Main analyses were conducted with multilevel models on the intention-to-treat sample. The results demonstrated no effect of the PCOMS compared with the TAU condition, neither for the primary outcome nor for the number of dropouts or clients experiencing deterioration. The PCOMS effect was not predicted by the counselors' adherence to the PCOMS protocol. Because the counselor level explained less than 1% of the variance in outcome, the counselor factors (i.e., attitude to feedback, reactions to negative feedback, and deliberate practice) were not analyzed as predictors. In conclusion, this study does not align with previous studies finding a positive effect of the PCOMS in counseling settings. However, all previous studies relied on the PCOMS Outcome Rating Scale as the only measure of outcome, maybe indicating a measure-specific effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies