Information

Dear user, the application need JavaScript support. Please enable JavaScript in your browser.

Title of the item:

Performance of Creatinine Clearance and Estimated GFR in Assessing Kidney Function in Living Donor Candidates.

Title:
Performance of Creatinine Clearance and Estimated GFR in Assessing Kidney Function in Living Donor Candidates.
Authors:
Garg N; Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Snyder G; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Li J; Qualitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Mandelbrot D; Division of Nephrology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Poggio ED; Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Source:
Transplantation [Transplantation] 2020 Mar; Vol. 104 (3), pp. 575-582.
Publication Type:
Comparative Study; Journal Article
Language:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.
MeSH Terms:
Living Donors*
Creatinine/*metabolism
Donor Selection/*methods
Glomerular Filtration Rate/*physiology
Kidney Function Tests/*methods
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Body Weight/physiology ; Contrast Media/administration & dosage ; Contrast Media/metabolism ; Creatinine/blood ; Creatinine/urine ; Female ; Humans ; Iodine Radioisotopes/administration & dosage ; Iodine Radioisotopes/metabolism ; Iothalamic Acid/administration & dosage ; Iothalamic Acid/metabolism ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Renal Elimination/physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Young Adult
References:
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, et al. US renal data system 2018 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.Am J Kidney Dis2019733S1A7–A8.
Kasiske BL, Anderson-Haag T, Israni AK, et al. A prospective controlled study of living kidney donors: three-year follow-up.Am J Kidney Dis201566114–124.
Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Wang MC, et al. Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation.JAMA2014311579–586.
Mjøen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, et al. Long-term risks for kidney donors.Kidney Int201486162–167.
Grams ME, Sang Y, Levey AS, et al.; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis ConsortiumKidney-failure risk projection for the living kidney-donor candidate.N Engl J Med2016374411–421.
Locke JE, Reed RD, Massie A, et al. Obesity increases the risk of end-stage renal disease among living kidney donors.Kidney Int201791699–703.
OPTN (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network)/UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing)OPTN Policies, Policy 14: Living Donation.Available at http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/ContentDocuments/OPTN_Policies.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2017.
Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M, Danovitch GM, et al. The medical evaluation of living kidney donors: a survey of US transplant centers.Am J Transplant200772333–2343.
Walser M. Creatinine excretion as a measure of protein nutrition in adults of varying age.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr1987115 Suppl73S–78S.
Ix JH, Wassel CL, Stevens LA, et al. Equations to estimate creatinine excretion rate: the CKD epidemiology collaboration.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol20116184–191.
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al.; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.Ann Intern Med2009150604–612.
Israelit AH, Long DL, White MG, et al. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate utilizing a single subcutaneous injection of 125I-iothalamate.Kidney Int19734346–349.
Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the 632+ bootstrap method.J Am Stat Assoc199792548–560.
Issa N, Meyer KH, Arrigain S, et al. Evaluation of creatinine-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate in a large cohort of living kidney donors.Transplantation200886223–230.
Huang N, Foster MC, Lentine KL, et al. Estimated GFR for living kidney donor evaluation.Am J Transplant201616171–180.
Gaillard F, Flamant M, Lemoine S, et al. Estimated or measured GFR in living kidney donors work-up?Am J Transplant2016163024–3032.
Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, et al.; CKD-EPI InvestigatorsEstimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.N Engl J Med201236720–29.
Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, et al. Summary of kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors.Transplantation20171011783–1792.
Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, et al. KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors.Transplantation20171018S Suppl 1S1–S109.
Nordén G, Lennerling A, Nyberg G. Low absolute glomerular filtration rate in the living kidney donor: a risk factor for graft loss.Transplantation2000701360–1362.
Kher A, Mandelbrot DA. The living kidney donor evaluation: focus on renal issues.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol20127366–371.
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group.Ann Intern Med1999130461–470.
Lewis J, Agodoa L, Cheek D, et al.; African-American Study of Hypertension and Kidney DiseaseComparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate.Am J Kidney Dis200138744–753.
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Contrast Media)
0 (Iodine Radioisotopes)
16CHD79MIX (Iothalamic Acid)
AYI8EX34EU (Creatinine)
GVO776611R (Iodine-125)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20190618 Date Completed: 20200930 Latest Revision: 20210125
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1097/TP.0000000000002797
PMID:
31205262
Academic Journal
Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assessment is a key aspect in the evaluation of living kidney donor candidates; however, data on performance of commonly used methods are limited.
Methods: We examined 769 living kidney donor candidates with 24-hour urine collections assessed as accurate by comparing measured creatinine excretion rate (CER) to CER estimated using a 4-variable equation previously developed and validated using robust methodology.
Results: Of all collections, 42.6% would have been deemed inaccurate, mostly under-collections, using the conventional weight- and gender-based CER estimation. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) overestimated I-iothalamate GFR (iGFR), estimated GFR (eGFR), underestimated iGFR, and their average [Avg (CrCl and eGFR)] essentially eliminated the GFR bias (median bias = +2.2, -5.4, and -1.0 mL/min/1.73 m, respectively; P < 0.001). This held true for all subgroups except blacks, where all 3 measures overestimated iGFR. Avg (CrCl and eGFR) also offered modestly improved accuracy compared with CrCl alone, as measured by the proportion of values falling within 10% (50.7% versus 45.3%; P = 0.009) and 30% of iGFR (94.5% versus 89.3%; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: When measured GFR is unavailable, the Avg (CrCl and eGFR) provides a better estimate of kidney function in kidney donor candidates than either measure alone, although in blacks the estimates are neither better nor worse.

We use cookies to help identify your computer so we can tailor your user experience, track shopping basket contents and remember where you are in the order process.