Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Stability of Three Different Sanitary Shoes on Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tytuł :
Stability of Three Different Sanitary Shoes on Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Autorzy :
Sánchez-Sáez JM; Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña Ferrol, 15403 Ferrol, Spain. .
Palomo-López P; University Center of Plasencia, University of Extremadura, 10600 Plasencia, Spain. .
Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R; Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain. .
Calvo-Lobo C; Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of León, Ponferrada, 24401 León, Spain. .
Losa-Iglesias ME; Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain. .
López-Del-Amo-Lorente A; Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain. .
López-López D; Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña Ferrol, 15403 Ferrol, Spain. .
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
International journal of environmental research and public health [Int J Environ Res Public Health] 2019 Jun 16; Vol. 16 (12). Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 16.
Typ publikacji :
Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: Basel : MDPI, c2004-
MeSH Terms :
Postural Balance*
Nurses/*statistics & numerical data
Shoes/*statistics & numerical data
Adult ; Cross-Over Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results
References :
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Mar;41(3):170-8. (PMID: 11920961)
J Nurs Adm. 2003 Mar;33(3):153-8. (PMID: 12629302)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 May-Jun;103(3):197-203. (PMID: 23697724)
J Occup Health. 2018 Mar 27;60(2):132-139. (PMID: 29151449)
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Apr;24(3):270-5. (PMID: 12657347)
J Nurs Adm. 2009 Jan;39(1):1-3. (PMID: 19104278)
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Oct;33(5):437-41. (PMID: 19811479)
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. (PMID: 843571)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 18;17:35. (PMID: 26781760)
Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34. (PMID: 22833776)
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687. (PMID: 24609605)
Hum Factors. 2015 Aug;57(5):754-92. (PMID: 25899249)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004 Sep-Oct;94(5):434-52. (PMID: 15377719)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Oct;26(8):885-7. (PMID: 21497964)
Appl Ergon. 2007 Mar;38(2):133-41. (PMID: 16765904)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Sep;40(7):725-9. (PMID: 12965164)
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;10(1):69-74. (PMID: 25709865)
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;98(5):364-9. (PMID: 18820038)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jun 05;15:196. (PMID: 24902582)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: health personnel*; personal protective equipment*; postural balance*; shoes*
Molecular Sequence :
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03764332
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20190619 Date Completed: 20191218 Latest Revision: 20200309
Update Code :
20210623
PubMed Central ID :
PMC6616452
DOI :
10.3390/ijerph16122126
PMID :
31208123
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: The main purpose of this research was to determine the stability of three different sanitary shoes on nurses with eyes open and closed with respect to barefoot condition. In addition, the secondary aim was to determine the reliability of stability measurements under these different conditions.
Methods: A crossover quasi-experimental study (NCT03764332) was performed. Twenty-six nurses who wore different sanitary shoes (Eva Plus Ultralight ® , Gym Step ® and Milan-SCL Liso ® ) were evaluated with respect to barefoot condition for stability measures on the Podoprint ® podobarometric and stabilometry tool and with eyes open and closed. Furthermore, the reliability of stability measurements was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) under these different conditions.
Results: Between-groups comparisons of the static and stabilometry podobarometric data with eyes open showed statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05). Milan-SCL Liso ® sanitary shoes improved podobarometric data of forefoot force and distribution with respect to barefoot condition. Eva Plus Ultralight ® and Gym Step ® sanitary shoes increased the stroke length mean, stroke surface mean, and anterior speed mean as well as reduced y axis displacement mean with respect to barefoot condition. Similar findings were determined for measurements with eyes closed. ICCs ranged from poor to excellent reliability (ICC = 0.010-0.995).
Conclusions: Sanitary shoes improved podobarometric and stabilometry stability with respect to barefoot condition.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies