Screening of live yeast and yeast derivatives for their impact of strain and dose on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial profiles with varying media pH levels in high-forage beef cattle diet.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Screening of live yeast and yeast derivatives for their impact of strain and dose on in vitro ruminal fermentation and microbial profiles with varying media pH levels in high-forage beef cattle diet.
Autorzy:: Jiao P; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Wei C; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Sun Y; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Xie X; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Zhang Y; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Wang S; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Hu G; College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
AlZahal O; AB Vista Feed Ingredients, Wiltshire, UK.
Yang W; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Źródło:: Journal of the science of food and agriculture [J Sci Food Agric] 2019 Dec; Vol. 99 (15), pp. 6751-6760. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 27.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: <2005-> : Chichester, West Sussex : John Wiley & Sons
Original Publication: London, Society of Chemical Industry.
MeSH Terms:: Animal Feed/*microbiology
Cattle/*metabolism
Rumen/*chemistry
Saccharomyces cerevisiae/*chemistry
Yeast, Dried/*chemistry
Animal Feed/analysis ; Animals ; Bacteria/classification ; Bacteria/genetics ; Bacteria/isolation & purification ; Bacteria/metabolism ; Cattle/growth & development ; Cattle/microbiology ; Digestion ; Fatty Acids, Volatile/metabolism ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Rumen/metabolism ; Rumen/microbiology ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae/classification ; Yeast, Dried/classification
References:: Vohra A and Satyanarayana T, Probiotic yeasts, in Microorganisms in Sustainable Agriculture and Biotechnology, ed. by Satyanarayana T, Johri BN and Prakash A. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 411-433 (2012).
Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND and Bach A, Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: past, present and future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:5-26 (2008).
Dias ALG, Freitas JA, Micai B, Azevedo RA, Greco LF and Santos LEP, Effect of supplemental yeast culture and dietary starch content on rumen fermentation and digestion in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 101:201-221 (2018).
Dias ALG, Freitas JA, Micai B, Azevedo RA, Greco LF and Santos LEP, Effects of supplementing yeast culture to diets differing in starch content on performance and feeding behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 101:186-200 (2018).
Jiao PX, Wei LY, Walker ND, Liu FZ, Chen LY, Beauchemin KA et al., Comparison of non-encapsulated and encapsulated active dried yeast on ruminal pH and fermentation, and site and extent of feed digestion in beef heifers fed high-grain diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 228:13-22 (2017).
Broadway PR, Carroll JA and Sanchez NCB, Live yeast and yeast cell wall supplements enhance immune function and performance in food-producing livestock: a review. Microorganisms 3:417-427 (2015).
Pinloche E, McEwan N, Marden JP, Bayourthe C, Auclair E and Newbold CJ, The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PLoS ONE 8:e67824 (2013).
Swyers KL, Wagner JJ, Dorton KL and Archibeque SL, Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product as an alternative to monensin on growth performance, cost of gain, and carcass characteristics of heavy-weight yearling beef steers. J Anim Sci 92:2538-2545 (2014).
Ran T, Shen YZ, Saleem AM, AlZahal O, Beauchemin KA and Yang WZ, Using ruminally protected and nonprotected active dried yeast as alternatives to antibiotics in finishing beef steers: growth performance, carcass traits, blood metabolites, and fecal Escherichia coli. J Anim Sci 96:4385-4397 (2018).
Beauchemin KA, Krehbiel CR and Newbold CJ, Chapter 7 enzymes, bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast: principles for use in ruminant nutrition. Biol Grow Anim 4:251-284 (2006).
Jiao PX, He ZX, Ding S, Walker N, Liu FZ, Beauchemin KA et al., Impact of strain and dose of live yeast and yeast derivatives on in vitro ruminal fermentation of a high-grain diet at two pH levels. Can J Anim Sci 98:477-487 (2018).
Li C, Beauchemin KA and Yang WZ, Effects of supplemental canola meal and various types of distillers grains on ruminal degradability, duodenal flow, and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in backgrounded heifers. J Anim Sci 91:5399-5409 (2013).
Narendranath NV and Power R, Relationship between pH and medium dissolved solids in terms of growth and metabolism of lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2239-2243 (2005).
Mohammed R, Vyas D, Yang WZ and Beauchemin KA, Changes in the relative population size of selected ruminal bacteria following an induced episode of acidosis in beef heifers receiving viable and non-viable active dried yeast. J Appl Microbiol 122:1483-1496 (2017).
Canadian Council on Animal Care, The Care and Use of Farm Animals in Research, Teaching and Testing. CCAC, Ottawa, ON, pp. 12-15 (2009).
Mauricio RM, Mould FL, Dhanoa MS, Owen E, Channa KS and Theodorou MK, A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 79:321-330 (1999).
France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS, Lopez S and Bannink A, Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br J Nutr 83:143-150 (2000).
He ML, Long J, Wang Y, Penner G and McAllister TA, Effect of replacing barley with wheat grain in finishing feedlot diets on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation, bacterial communities and plasma metabolites in beef steers. Livest Sci 176:104-110 (2015).
Wang Y, Alexander TW and McAllister TA, In vitro effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on rumen bacterial populations and fermentation. J Sci Food Agric 89:2252-2260 (2009).
AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, 16th Ed. Association of Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC (2005).
Rhine ED, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL and Pratt EJ, Improving the berthelot reaction for determining ammonium in soil extracts and water. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:473-480 (1998).
He ZX, Walker ND, McAllister TA and Yang WZ, Effect of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles and fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation, digestibility, growth performance, and feeding behavior of beef cattle. J Anim Sci 93:1218-1228 (2015).
Malekkhahi M, Tahmasbi AM, Naserian AA, Danesh-Mesgaran M, Kleen JL, AlZahal O et al., Effects of supplementation of active dried yeast and malateduring sub-acute ruminal acidosis on rumen fermentation,microbial population, selected blood metabolites, and milkproduction in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 213:29-43 (2016).
Jiao PX, Liu FZ, Beauchemin KA and Yang WZ, Impact of strain and dose of lactic acid bacteria on in vitro ruminal fermentation with varying media pH levels and feed substrates. Anim Feed Sci Technol 224:1-13 (2017).
Russell JB and Dombrowski DB, Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:604-610 (1980).
Kleen J, Hooijer G, Rehage J and Noordhuizen J, Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): a review. J Vet Med A 50:406-414 (2003).
Plaizier J, Krause D, Gozho G and McBride B, Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J 176:21-31 (2008).
Vohra A, Syal P and Madan A, Probiotic yeasts in livestock sector. Anim Feed Sci Technol 219:31-47 (2016).
Castillejos L, Calsamiglia S, Martin-Tereso J and TerWijlen H, In vitro evaluation of effects of ten essential oils at three doses on ruminal fermentation of high concentrate feedlot type diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:259-270 (2008).
Díaz A, Ranilla MJ, Saro C, Tejido ML, Pérez-Quintana M and Carro MD, Influence of increasing doses of a yeast hydrolyzate obtained from sugarcane processing on in vitro rumen fermentation of two different diets and bacterial diversity in batch cultures and Rusitec fermenters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 232:129-138 (2017).
Oeztuerk H, Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J Anim Feed Sci 18:142-150 (2009).
Froetschel MA, Croom WJ, Huglet WM, Argenzio RA, Liacos JA and Broquist HP, Effects of slaframine on ruminant digestive function: liquid turnover rate and fermentation patterns in sheep and cattle. J Anim Sci 64:1241-1248 (1987).
Fernando FC, Purvis HT, Najar FZ, Sukharnikov LO, Krehbiel CR, Nagaraja TG et al., Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7482-7490 (2010).
Schoonmaker JP, Trenkle AH and Beitz DC, Effect of feeding wet distillers grains on performance, marbling deposition, and fatty acid content of beef from steers fed low- or high-forage diets. J Anim Sci 88:3657-3665 (2010).
Callaway ES and Martin SA, Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J Dairy Sci 80:2035-2044 (1997).
Opsi F, Fortina R, Tassone S, Bodas R and López S, Effects of inactivated and live cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro ruminal fermentation of diets with different forage: concentrate ratio. J Agr Sci 150:271-283 (2012).
Lynch HA and Martin SA, Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture and Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation. J Dairy Sci 85:2603-2608 (2002).
Dawson KA, Newman KE and Boling JA, Effects of microbial supplements containing yeast and lactobacilli on roughage-fed ruminal microbial activities. J Anim Sci 68:3392-3398 (1990).
Blümmel M and Ørskov ER, Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 40:109-119 (1993).
Tedeschi LO, Fox DG and Tylutki TP, Potential environmental benefits of ionophores in ruminant diets. J Environ Qual 32:1591-1602 (2003).
Li YL, Li C, Beauchemin KA and Yang WZ, Effects of a commercial blend of essential oils and monensin in a high-grain diet containing wheat distillers' grains on in vitro fermentation. Can J Anim Sci 93:387-398 (2013).
Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA and Hunter N, Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148:257-266 (2002).
Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M and Benno Y, Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2766-2774 (2001).
Wang RF, Cao WW and Cerniglia CE, PCR detection of Ruminococcus spp. in human and animal faecal samples. Mol Cell Probes 11:259-265 (1998).
Grant Information:: 2015E006R Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
Contributed Indexing:: Keywords: batch culture; gas production; live yeast; media pH; microbial population; yeast derivative
Substance Nomenclature:: 0 (Fatty Acids, Volatile)
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20190730 Date Completed: 20191121 Latest Revision: 20200108
Update Code:: 20240105
DOI:: 10.1002/jsfa.9957
PMID:: 31353469
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

Background: Yeast products showed beneficial effects with respect to stabilizing ruminal pH, stimulating ruminal fermentation and improving production efficiency. Batch cultures were conducted to evaluate the effects of yeast products on gas production (GP), dry matter disappearance (DMD) and fermentation characteristics of high-forage substrate. The study was a two media pH (5.8 and 6.5) × five yeasts (three live yeasts, LY: LY1, LY2, LY3; two yeast derivatives, YD: YD4, YD5) × four dosages factorial arrangement, with monensin (Mon) assigned as a positive control.
Results: Greater (P < 0.01) GP, DMD, volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, ratio of acetate to propionate (A:P) and copy numbers of Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens were observed at pH 6.5 than at pH 5.8. The GP kinetics, DMD, VFA concentration, A:P and NH 3 -N concentration differed (P < 0.05) among yeasts but varied with media pH or yeast dosages. Increasing doses of LY3 linearly increased DMD (P < 0.04) and VFA concentration (P < 0.001) at media pH 5.8. The DMD linearly (P < 0.02) increased with increased addition of YD4 (pH 6.5) and YD5 (pH 5.8) and the ratio of A:P linearly decreased (P < 0.01) with the addition of YD4 or YD5 at pH 5.8. Overall greater (P < 0.05) GP, A:P (pH 5.8) and DMD (pH 6.5) were observed with yeast products than with Mon.
Conclusion: LY3 appeared to be an interesting candidate for improving rumen digestibility and fermentation efficiency, particularly at low media pH. YD4 or YD5 improved fermentation efficiency and can be potentially fed as an alternative to Mon. © 2019 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
(© 2019 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.)

Informacja