Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non-inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid.

Tytuł:
Combination of bisacodyl suppository and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid is a non-inferior and comfortable regimen compared to 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid.
Autorzy:
Kim SH; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kim ER; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kim K; Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kim TJ; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hong SN; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chang DK; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kim YH; Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Źródło:
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society [Dig Endosc] 2020 May; Vol. 32 (4), pp. 600-607. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 11.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2019- : Richmond, Vic., Australia : John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Original Publication: Tokyo, Japan : The Society, c1989-
MeSH Terms:
Colonoscopy*
Ascorbic Acid/*administration & dosage
Bisacodyl/*administration & dosage
Cathartics/*administration & dosage
Polyethylene Glycols/*administration & dosage
Surface-Active Agents/*administration & dosage
Adult ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Compliance ; Prospective Studies ; Suppositories ; Surveys and Questionnaires
References:
Bechtold ML, Choudhary A. Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: A continual search for excellence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 155-7.
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 687-96.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-95.
Hendry PO, Jenkins JT, Diament RH. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: A prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9: 745-8.
Park S, Lim YJ. Adjuncts to colonic cleansing before colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 2735-40.
Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 58: 76-9.
Woo DH, Kim KO, Jeong DE et al. Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice. Intest. Res. 2018; 16: 293-8.
Park HJ, Chae MH, Kim HS et al. Colon transit time may predict inadequate bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation. Intest. Res. 2015; 13: 339-45.
Burke CA, Church JM. Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: The importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 66: 565-73.
Kastenberg D, Chasen R, Choudhary C et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: Two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 705-13.
Valiante F, Bellumat A, De Bona M, De Boni M. Bisacodyl plus split 2-L polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone improves quality of bowel preparation before screening colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 19: 5493-9.
Parente F, Vailati C, Bargiggia S et al. 2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation. Dig. Liver Dis. 2015; 47: 857-63.
Mussetto A, Frazzoni L, Paggi S et al. Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: A randomized trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 917-24.
Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis. Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 229-33; discussion 233-4.
Sharma VK, Chockalingham SK, Ugheoke EA et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of the use of polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in four-liter versus two-liter volumes and pretreatment with either magnesium citrate or bisacodyl for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998; 47: 167-71.
Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 45: 1380-6.
Jansen SV, Goedhard JG, Winkens B, van Deursen CT. Preparation before colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; 23: 897-902.
Valiante F, Pontone S, Hassan C et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-L PEG solution plus ascorbic acid vs 4-L PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Dig. Liver Dis. 2012; 44: 224-7.
Moon CM, Park DI, Choe YG et al. Randomized trial of 2-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid versus 4-L polyethylene glycol as bowel cleansing for colonoscopy in an optimal setting. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014; 29: 1223-8.
Ponchon T, Boustiere C, Heresbach D, Hagege H, Tarrerias AL, Halphen M. A low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: The NORMO randomised clinical trial. Dig. Liver Dis. 2013; 45: 820-6.
Tae CH, Jung SA, Na SK et al. The use of low-volume polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid versus 2 L of polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 50: 1039-44.
Kang SH, Jeen YT, Lee JH et al. Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 343-8.
Kwon JE, Lee JW, Im JP et al. Comparable efficacy of a 1-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution administered with bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and ascorbic acid solution for colonoscopy preparation: A prospective, randomized and Investigator-blinded trial. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0162051.
Calderwood AH, Schroy PC 3rd, Lieberman DA, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, Jacobson BC. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014; 80: 269-76.
Jang JY, Chun HJ. Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 2746-50.
Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 903-24.
Choi JY, Yoon H, Na G et al. 1L morning-only polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with prepackaged low-residue diet versus 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation: A randomized trial. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016; 31: 217-8.
Lee JW, Choi JY, Yoon H et al. The effect of 1L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with prepackaged low-residue diet for bowel preparation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 85: Ab185.
Manabe N, Cremonini F, Camilleri M, Sandborn WJ, Burton DD. Effects of bisacodyl on ascending colon emptying and overall colonic transit in healthy volunteers. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009; 30: 930-6.
Gohel TD, Burke CA, Lankaala P et al. Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014; 12: 1137-42.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; bisacodyl; colonoscopy; compliance; polyethylene glycol
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Cathartics)
0 (Suppositories)
0 (Surface-Active Agents)
10X0709Y6I (Bisacodyl)
3WJQ0SDW1A (Polyethylene Glycols)
PQ6CK8PD0R (Ascorbic Acid)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20191002 Date Completed: 20210322 Latest Revision: 20210322
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1111/den.13548
PMID:
31574170
Czasopismo naukowe
Background and Aim: Appropriate bowel cleansing before colonoscopy is an important factor in increasing the detection rate of lesions. Low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) reduces the dosage of bowel preparation agent, but still presents discomfort to patients. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of bowel cleansing between 2 L PEG-Asc (control) and 1 L PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository (suppository) groups, and the secondary aim was to investigate complications and tolerability between the two groups.
Methods: This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled study. We identified 168 patients scheduled for colonoscopy between August 2017 and January 2018 and randomly assigned them to the control or to the suppository groups. Efficacy of bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and side-effects were surveyed using questionnaires.
Results: No significant difference was detected in baseline characteristics including insertion and withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates between the two groups. Total BBPS score was 7.93 ± 1.06 and 7.74 ± 1.02 in the control and suppository groups, respectively (P = 0.22). Incidence of abdominal pain and nausea was not statistically different, whereas that of sleep disturbance and anal discomfort was higher in the control group. (P = 0.00).
Conclusions: One liter PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository resulted in an equivalent bowel-cleansing outcome with reduced patient discomfort compared to 2 L PEG-Asc. Therefore, PEG-Asc with bisacodyl suppository represents a potential alternative and increases patient compliance with bowel preparation.
(© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies