Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production.

Tytuł:
Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production.
Autorzy:
Schertz J; University of Toronto, Department of Language Studies, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Clare EJ; University of Toronto, Department of Linguistics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Źródło:
Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science [Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci] 2020 Mar; Vol. 11 (2), pp. e1521. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 13.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Review
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: [Malden, MA] : John Wiley & Sons
MeSH Terms:
Cues*
Phonetics*
Speech Perception*
Speech Production Measurement*
Humans
References:
Abramson, A. S., & Lisker, L. (1985). Relative power of cues: F0 shift versus voice timing. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp. 25-33). Orlando: Academic Press.
Ainsworth, W., & Paliwal, K. (1984). Correlation between the production and perception of the english glides/w, r, l, j/. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 237-243.
Beddor, P. S. (2015). The relation between language users' perception and production repertoires. In: Wolters M, Livingstone J, Beattie B, Smith R, MacMahon M, Stuart-Smith J, & Scobbie J, (Eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS. Glasgow: The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS.
Beddor, P. (1983). Phonological and phonetic effects of nasalization on vowel height. (PhD thesis). The University of Minnesota.
Beddor, P. (2009). A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language, 85(4), 785-821.
Beddor, P. S., Coetzee, A. W., Styler, W., McGowan, K. B., & Boland, J. E. (2018). The time course of individuals' perception of coarticulatory information is linked to their production: Implications for sound change. Language, 94(4), 931-968.
Benkí, J. R. (2001). Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 29(1), 1-22.
Benkí, J. R. (2005). Perception of VOT and first formant onset by Spanish and English speakers. In J. Cohen, K. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism (pp. 204-248). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1997). Perception and production of a new vowel category by second-language learners. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 53-74). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Borsky, S., Tuller, B., & Shapiro, L. P. (1998). “How to milk a coat:” the effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(5), 2670-2676.
Brunelle, M. (2009). Tone perception in northern and southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 79-96.
Carignan, C. (2018). Using naive listener imitations of native speaker productions to investigate mechanisms of listener-based sound change. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 9(1), 18.
Casillas, J. (2015). Production and perception of the/i/−/ɪ/ vowel contrast: The case of L2-dominant early learners of English. Phonetica, 72(2-3), 182-205.
Casserly, E. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Speech perception and production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(5), 629-647.
Clare, E. J. (2019). Dynamicity in speech perception (PhD Dissertation). Toronto: University of Toronto.
Clayards, M. (2018a). Differences in cue weights for speech perception are correlated for individuals within and across contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL172-EL177.
Clayards, M. (2018b). Individual talker and token covariation in the production of multiple cues to stop voicing. Phonetica, 75(1), 1-23.
Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. A. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition, 108(3), 804-809.
Coetzee, A. W., Beddor, P. S., Shedden, K., Styler, W., & Wissing, D. (2018). Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 185-216.
Cooper, F. S., Liberman, A. M., & Borst, J. M. (1951). The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 37(5), 318-325.
Delattre, P. C., Liberman, M. A., & Cooper, F. S. (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 769-773.
DiCanio, C. (2014). Cue weight in the perception of Trique glottal consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(2), 884-895.
DiCanio, C. T. (2012). The phonetics of fortis and lenis consonants in Itunyoso Trique. International Journal of American Linguistics, 78(2), 239-272.
Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77-95.
Efron, B. (1975). The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(352), 892-898.
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 452-465.
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(4), 551-585.
Escudero, P., & Morrison, G. S. (2005). Measuring cue weighting: A reply to Morrison. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(4), 607-617.
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470.
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist approach. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
Garellek, M. (2012). The timing and sequencing of coarticulated non-modal phonation in English and White Hmong. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 152-161.
Garellek, M., Keating, P., Esposito, C. M., & Kreiman, J. (2013). Voice quality and tone identification in white Hmong. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(2), 1078-1089.
Gordon, P. C., Eberhardt, J. L., & Rueckl, J. G. (1993). Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 1-42.
Goudbeek, M., Cutler, A., & Smits, R. (2008). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories. Speech Communication, 50(2), 109-125.
Gruenenfelder, T. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Fundamental frequency as a cue to postvocalic consonantal voicing: Some data from speech perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(6), 514-520.
Harrington, J. (2008). Compensation for coarticulation, /u/−fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 2825-2835.
Harrington, J., Kleber, F., Reubold, U., Schiel, F., Stevens, M., & Assmann, P. (2019). The phonetic basis of the origin and spread of sound change. In: Katz W, & Assmann P, (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6-12. Journal of Phonetics, 28(4), 377-396.
Hazan, V., & Boulakia, G. (1993). Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36(1), 17-38.
Holt, L., & Lotto, A. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3059-3071.
Holt, L., Lotto, A. J., & Kluender, K. R. (2001). Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(2), 764-774.
Hornickel, J., Skoe, E., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., & Kraus, N. (2009). Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(31), 13022-13027.
Idemaru, K., Holt, L., & Seltman, H. (2012). Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: The case of Japanese stop lengths. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(6), 3950-3964.
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939-1956.
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2013). The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/−/l/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(6), 4232-4246.
Johnson, K. (2008). Speaker normalization in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 262-289). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Kang, K.-H. (2013). F0 perturbation as a perceptual cue to stop distinction in Busan and Seoul dialects of Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 5(4), 137-143.
Kang, Y., Kung, K., Li, J., Ting, C., & Yeung, J. (2018). Speech rate variation in English stop perception and production. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 40.
Kang, Y., Schertz, J., & Han, S. (in press). The phonology and phonetics of Korean stop laryngeal contrasts. In The Cambridge handbook of Korean language and linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapnoula, E. C., Winn, M. B., Kong, E., Edwards, J., & McMurray, B. (2017). Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach. Human Perception and Performance: Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Kim, D., & Clayards, M. (2019). Individual differences in the link between perception and production and the mechanisms of phonetic imitation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34, 769-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1582787.
Kingston, J. (2011). Tonogenesis. In: van Oostendorp M, Ewen, CJ, Hume EV, & Rice K, (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 1-30). Malden, MA: Wiley Online Library.
Kingston, J., Diehl, R., Kirk, C., & Castleman, W. (2008). On the initial perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 28-54.
Kingston, J., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70(3), 419-454.
Kingston, J., & Diehl, R. L. (1995). Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 4, 7-27.
Kirby, J. P. (2014). Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 69-85.
Kleber, F., Harrington, J., & Reubold, U. (2012). The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress. Language and Speech, 55(3), 383-405.
Kleinschmidt, D. F. (2016). Perception in a variable but structured world: the case of speech perception. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester.
Kondaurova, M., & Francis, A. (2008). The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3959-3971.
Kondaurova, M., & Francis, A. (2010). The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: Comparison of three training methods. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 569-587.
Kong, E., & Edwards, J. (2016). Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 40-57.
Kong, E., & Lee, H. (2018). Attentional modulation and individual differences in explaining the changing role of fundamental frequency in Korean laryngeal stop perception. Language and Speech, 61(3), 384-408.
Kong, E., & Yoon, I. (2013). L2 proficiency effect on the acoustic cue-weighting pattern by Korean L2 learners of English: Production and perception of English stops. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 5(4), 81-90.
Kuang, J., & Cui, A. (2018). Relative cue weighting in production and perception of an ongoing sound change in southern Yi. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 194-214.
Kurowski, K., & Blumstein, S. E. (1988). Acoustic properties for place of articulation in nasal consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(6), 1917-1927.
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98-104.
Lee, H., & Jongman, A. (2018). Effects of sound change on the weighting of acoustic cues to the three-way laryngeal stop contrast in korean: Diachronic and dialectal comparisons. Language and Speech., 62, 509-530.
Lee, H., Politzer-Ahles, S., & Jongman, A. (2013). Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 41(2), 117-132.
Lehet, M., & Holt, L. L. (2017). Dimension-based statistical learning affects both speech perception and production. Cognitive Science, 41(S4), 885-912.
Lei, P.-W., & Koehly, L. M. (2003). Linear discriminant analysis versus logistic regression: A comparison of classification errors in the two-group case. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(1), 25-49.
Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 117-123.
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
Lim, S., & Han, J.-I. (2014). Effects of dialectal differences in the use of native-language acoustic cues on the production and perception of second language stops. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 20(3), 403-426.
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & H Theory. Speech Production and Speech Modeling, 55, 403-439.
Lisker, L. (1975). Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(6), 1547-1551.
Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29(1), 3-11.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384-422.
Llanos, F., Dmitrieva, O., Shultz, A., & Francis, A. L. (2013). Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3), 2213-2224.
Löfqvist, A., Baer, T., McGarr, N. S., & Story, R. S. (1989). The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(3), 1314-1321.
Mann, V., & Repp, B. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [s]-[ʃ] distinction. Attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(3), 213-228.
McGowan, R. S., Nittrouer, S., & Manning, C. J. (2004). Development of /ɹ/ in young, Midwestern, American children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(2), 871-884.
Miller, J. L., Green, K. P., & Reeves, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43(1-3), 106-115.
Morrison, G. S. (2005). An appropriate metric for cue weighting in L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 597-606.
Morrison, G. S. (2007). Logistic regression modelling for first- and second-language perception data. In M. J. Solé, P. Prieto, & J. Mascaró (Eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in romance phonology (pp. 219-2346). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Morrison, G. S. (2009). L1-Spanish speakers acquisition of the English /i/−/I/ contrast II: Perception of vowel inherent spectral change. Language and Speech, 52(4), 437-462.
Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234-270.
Nearey, T. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(6), 3241-3254.
Newman, R. S. (2003). Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(5), 2850-2857.
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational ideas - Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(11), 591-613.
Nittrouer, S. (1992). Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 351-382.
Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 711-719.
Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204-238.
Ohala, J. J. (1993). Sound change as nature's speech perception experiment. Speech Communication, 13(1-2), 155-161.
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382-2393.
Phuong, V. T. (1981). The acoustic and perceptual nature of tone in Vietnamese. (PhD thesis). Australian National University.
Repp, B. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 81-110.
Roettger, T. B. (2019). Researcher degrees of freedom in phonetic research. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 1.
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of twenty-five years of perception training research. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 39(1), 187-224.
Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1207-1218.
Schertz, J. (2014). The structure and plasticity of phonetic categories across languages and modalities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona.
Schertz, J., Carbonell, K. M., & Lotto, A. J. (2019). Language-specificity in phonetic cue weighting: Monolingual and bilingual perception of the stop voicing contrast in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 24, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497278.
Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183-204.
Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2016). Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 355-367.
Schertz, J., Kang, Y., & Han, S. (2019). Sources of variability in phonetic perception: The joint influence of listener and talker characteristics on perception of the Korean stop contrast. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.67.
Shultz, A., Francis, A., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), EL95-EL101.
Stilp, C. E., Rogers, T. T., & Kluender, K. R. (2010). Rapid efficient coding of correlated complex acoustic properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50), 21914-21919.
Stevens, K. N., Blumstein, S. E., Glicksman, L., Burton, M., & Kurowski, K. (1992). Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(5), 2979-3000.
Summerfield, Q., & Haggard, M. (1972). Speech rate effects in the perception of stop voicing. Speech Synthesis Perception, 6, 1-12.
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E., Li, F., & Kong, E. (2018). Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 147-161.
Walley, A. C., & Carrell, T. D. (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(3), 1011-1022.
Winn, M. B., Chatterjee, M., & Idsardi, W. J. (2013). Roles of voice onset time and f0 in stop consonant voicing perception: Effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1097-1107.
Wright, R. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. S. Bronson (Ed.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yu, A. C. L., & Zellou, G. (2019). Individual differences in language processing: Phonology. Annual Reviews of Linguistics, 5, 131-150.
Yu, A. C. L. (2019). On the nature of the perception-production link: Individual variability in English sibilant-vowel coarticulation. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 2.
Zellou, G. (2017). Individual differences in the production of nasal coarticulation and perceptual compensation. Journal of Phonetics, 61, 13-29.
Zhang, J., & Yan, H. (2018). Contextually dependent cue realization and cue weighting for a laryngeal contrast in Shanghai Wu. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), 1293-1308.
Zygis, M, & Hamann, S. (2003). Perceptual and Acoustic Cues of Polish Coronal Fricatives. Proceedings of ICPhS (pp. 395-398), Glasgow: The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015.
Grant Information:
430-2017-00011 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: cue weighting; phonetics; speech perception; speech production
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20191015 Date Completed: 20200929 Latest Revision: 20200929
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1002/wcs.1521
PMID:
31608590
Czasopismo naukowe
Speech sound contrasts differ along multiple phonetic dimensions. During speech perception, listeners must decide which cues are relevant, and determine the relative importance of each cue, while also integrating other, signal-external cues. The comparison of cue weighting in perception and production bears on a range of theoretical issues including the processes underlying sound change, the time course of learning, the nature of cues, and the perception-production interface. Research examining the relative alignment of cue weighting across the modalities, on both a community and individual level, has revealed both parallels and asymmetries between the modalities. The extraordinarily wide range of ways that have been used to conceptualize and quantify cue weights reflects the inherent theoretical, methodological, and analytical differences between the two modalities. More consideration of the choices of analytical metrics, explicit discussion of the theoretical assumptions that underlie them, and systematic investigations of different types of cues will lead to more generalizable findings that can be incorporated into computational implementable models of speech processing. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain Psychology > Language.
(© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies