-
Tytuł:
-
Collaborative care vs consultation liaison for depression and anxiety disorders in general practice: study protocol for two randomized controlled trials (the Danish Collabri Flex trials).
-
Autorzy:
-
Curth NK; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark. .
Brinck-Claussen U; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Jørgensen KB; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Rosendal S; Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Nordre Fasanvej 59, Vej 5, 12, 2nd floor, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Hjorthøj C; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Nordentoft M; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Eplov LF; Research Unit, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Kildegårdsvej 28, 15A, 4th floor, DK-2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
-
Źródło:
-
Trials [Trials] 2019 Oct 25; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 607. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 25.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Clinical Trial Protocol; Journal Article
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-
-
MeSH Terms:
-
General Practice*
Patient Care Team*
Referral and Consultation*
Anxiety Disorders/*therapy
Depression/*therapy
Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis ; Anxiety Disorders/psychology ; Cooperative Behavior ; Denmark ; Depression/diagnosis ; Depression/psychology ; Equivalence Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Treatment Outcome
-
References:
-
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jun 02;17:62. (PMID: 27250527)
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. (PMID: 18929686)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;(9):CD007193. (PMID: 26384252)
Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct-Dec;35(4):416-31. (PMID: 24402217)
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3145-51. (PMID: 12813120)
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):9-16. (PMID: 12534758)
Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453):82-93. (PMID: 15639683)
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. (PMID: 25831962)
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2003;33(1):17-37. (PMID: 12906341)
Health Psychol. 2001 Mar;20(2):112-9. (PMID: 11315728)
Psychol Med. 2005 Feb;35(2):245-56. (PMID: 15841682)
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;(420):21-7. (PMID: 15128384)
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;154(12):1734-40. (PMID: 9396954)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 16;6:88. (PMID: 16842629)
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Mar;23(2):70-83. (PMID: 18301121)
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. (PMID: 11491192)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7. (PMID: 3204199)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Mar-Apr;22(2):84-96. (PMID: 10896498)
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 May;50(5):777-86. (PMID: 25409867)
Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):217-27. (PMID: 12622301)
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;185:46-54. (PMID: 15231555)
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Aug 04;10:61. (PMID: 20684786)
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 04;12:66. (PMID: 21726443)
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Dec;57(12):1738-44. (PMID: 17158488)
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;195(4):308-17. (PMID: 19794198)
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 28;10:10. (PMID: 20109169)
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Feb;109(2):96-103. (PMID: 14725589)
Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7. (PMID: 10259963)
Trials. 2017 Aug 16;18(1):382. (PMID: 28814317)
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;21(9):655-79. (PMID: 21896369)
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Oct;77(4):247-63. (PMID: 25201482)
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Jan;117(1):57-66. (PMID: 18005369)
BMJ. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):839-42. (PMID: 15817554)
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-3. (PMID: 21775347)
BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5. (PMID: 18316340)
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(2):93-105. (PMID: 9565717)
Psychol Med. 2008 Feb;38(2):279-87. (PMID: 17803837)
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 27;166(21):2314-21. (PMID: 17130383)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;16(5):895-901. (PMID: 20626541)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;32(3):246-54. (PMID: 20430227)
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25. (PMID: 17339617)
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):26-9. (PMID: 21775346)
Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. (PMID: 10245370)
Med Care. 2001 Nov;39(11):1217-23. (PMID: 11606875)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006525. (PMID: 23076925)
Trials. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):344. (PMID: 28732523)
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):A4350. (PMID: 22293046)
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: Anxiety; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Collaborative care; Depression; General practice; Randomized controlled trial
-
Molecular Sequence:
-
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03113175; NCT03113201
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20191027 Date Completed: 20200415 Latest Revision: 20200415
-
Update Code:
-
20240104
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC6814969
-
DOI:
-
10.1186/s13063-019-3657-0
-
PMID:
-
31653228
-
Background: Models of collaborative care and consultation liaison propose organizational changes to improve the quality of care for people with common mental disorders, such as anxiety and depression. Some literature suggests only short-term positive effects of consultation liaison on patient-related outcomes, whereas collaborative care demonstrates both short-term and long-term positive effects. To our knowledge, only one randomized trial has compared the effects of these models. Collaborative care was superior to consultation liaison in reducing symptoms of depression for up to 3 months, but the authors found no difference at 9-months' follow-up. The Collabri Flex Trial for Depression and the Collabri Flex Trial for Anxiety aim to compare the effects of collaborative care with those of a form of consultation liaison that contains potential contaminating elements from collaborative care. The trials build on knowledge from the previous cluster-randomized Collabri trials.
Methods: Two randomized, investigator-initiated, parallel-group, superiority trials have been established: one investigating the effects of collaborative care vs consultation liaison for depression and one investigating the effects of collaborative care vs consultation liaison for generalized anxiety, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder at 6-months' follow-up. Participants are recruited from general practices in the Capital Region of Denmark: 240 in the depression trial and 284 in the anxiety trial. The primary outcome is self-reported depression symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)) in the depression trial and self-reported anxiety symptoms (Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)) in the anxiety trial. In both trials, the self-reported secondary outcomes are general psychological problems and symptoms (Symptom Checklist 90-Revised), functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale) and general well-being (World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index). In the depression trial, BAI is an additional secondary outcome, and BDI-II is an additional secondary outcome in the anxiety trial. Explorative outcomes will also be collected.
Discussion: The results will supplement those of the cluster-randomized Collabri trials and provide pivotal information about the effects of collaborative care in Denmark.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03113175 and NCT03113201 . Registered on 13 April 2017.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.