Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands.

Tytuł :
The Dutch chaos case: A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands.
Autorzy :
Dreesens D; Maastricht University/School CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, P.O. Box 3320, 3502 ZB, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: .
Kremer L; Department of Paediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital/Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Maxima Centre, Postbus 113, 3720 AC, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: .
van der Weijden T; Maastricht University/School CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: .
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Health Policy] 2019 Dec; Vol. 123 (12), pp. 1288-1297. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 16.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: Limerick : Elsevier Scientific Publishers
Original Publication: Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1984-
MeSH Terms :
Decision Making, Shared*
Decision Support Techniques*
Clinical Protocols ; Critical Pathways ; Decision Making ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Netherlands ; Patient Participation
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: (Shared) decision-making*; Definitions*; Guidelines*; Knowledge*; Review*; Tools*
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20191115 Date Completed: 20200916 Latest Revision: 20200916
Update Code :
20201023
DOI :
10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.001
PMID :
31722782
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: To keep clinicians up-to-date with the latest evidence, clinical practice and patient preferences, more and more knowledge tools - aiming to synthesise knowledge and support (shared) decision-making - are being developed. Unfortunately, it seems that in the Netherlands, and possibly elsewhere, the amount of different knowledge tool types makes it difficult to see the forest through the trees.
Methods: A scoping review, exploring types of knowledge tools available to Dutch clinicians (and patients) and how these tools are described. The search terms were collected from thesauri and textbooks, and used to search the websites and documents of selected national tool developing organisations.
Results: The review yielded 126 tool types. We included 67 different tool types, such as guidelines, protocols, standards and clinical pathways. Half of those tool types were aimed at clinicians, 14 at patients and 18 at both. In general, descriptions of the tool types were hard to find or incomplete.
Conclusions: There exists a myriad of knowledge tool types and their descriptions are mostly unclear. The information overload experienced by clinicians is not addressed effectively by developing numerous unclearly defined knowledge tools. We recommend limiting the number of tool types and making a greater effort in clearly defining them. This abundance of poorly defined tools does not seem to be restricted to the Netherlands.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies