Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Tytuł:
Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Autorzy:
Xu L; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhang G; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Shi B; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Liu Y; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zou T; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yan W; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiao Y; Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xue H; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Feng F; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lei J; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jin Z; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. .
Sun H; Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. sunhao_.
Źródło:
Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society [Cancer Imaging] 2019 Dec 21; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 90. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 21.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: <2014- > : London : Springer Nature
Original Publication: London : e-med, c2000]-
MeSH Terms:
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods
Prostatic Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging
Contrast Media ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity
References:
World J Urol. 2015 Jul;33(7):1023-30. (PMID: 25081011)
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):209-220. (PMID: 30929292)
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):859-869. (PMID: 28727501)
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):e137-e138. (PMID: 27130148)
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):e136. (PMID: 27126376)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):326-36. (PMID: 26594835)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W226-W241. (PMID: 30240296)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. (PMID: 29313949)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):W266-72. (PMID: 25714311)
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Nov;85(11):2119-2126. (PMID: 27776667)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):369-378. (PMID: 29894216)
Int J Urol. 2016 Jul;23(7):550-7. (PMID: 27184019)
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0221775. (PMID: 31647819)
World J Urol. 2019 Apr;37(4):691-699. (PMID: 30078170)
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):493-505. (PMID: 28727544)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. (PMID: 26808342)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):357-365. (PMID: 30512996)
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Dec;69(6):567-578. (PMID: 28488844)
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1498-509. (PMID: 17131126)
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):78-94. (PMID: 31326219)
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):790-813. (PMID: 31587989)
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:17-23. (PMID: 29571792)
Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):448-57. (PMID: 25559231)
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):243-8. (PMID: 20859852)
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. (PMID: 27568654)
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Dec;85(12):2269-2274. (PMID: 27842676)
Invest Radiol. 2007 Dec;42(12):842-7. (PMID: 18007156)
Anticancer Res. 2017 Mar;37(3):1263-1271. (PMID: 28314291)
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):119-129. (PMID: 27783538)
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. (PMID: 28177964)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. (PMID: 30207593)
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. (PMID: 26427566)
Grant Information:
7192176 Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation; 3332018022 Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; 10023201700104 Education Reform Fund of Peking Union Medical College; 91859119 National Natural Science Foundation of China; No. 2019PT320008 and 2018PT32003 National Public Welfare Basic Scientific Research Project of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; 2019zlgc0705 Youth Educator Program of Peking Union Medical College
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Dynamic contrasted-enhanced imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate imaging reporting and data system
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Contrast Media)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20191223 Date Completed: 20200312 Latest Revision: 20200312
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC6925429
DOI:
10.1186/s40644-019-0274-9
PMID:
31864408
Czasopismo naukowe
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and to explore the application value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in prostate imaging.
Methods and Materials: This study retrospectively enrolled 235 patients with suspected PCa in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017, and all lesions were histopathologically confirmed. The lesions were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS V2). The bpMRI (T2-weighted imaging [T2WI], diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]/apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) and mpMRI (T2WI, DWI/ADC and DCE) scores were recorded to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for each method were calculated and compared. The patients were further stratified according to bpMRI scores (bpMRI ≥3, and bpMRI = 3, 4, 5) to analyse the difference in DCE MRI between PCa and non-PCa lesions (as well as between csPCa and non-csPCa).
Results: The AUC values for the bpMRI and mpMRI protocols for PCa were comparable (0.790 [0.732-0.840] and 0.791 [0.733-0.841], respectively). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of bpMRI for PCa were 76.2, 79.5, 72.6, 75.8, and 76.6%, respectively, and the values for mpMRI were 77.4, 84.4, 69.9, 75.2, and 80.6%, respectively. The AUC values for the bpMRI and mpMRI protocols for the diagnosis of csPCa were similar (0.781 [0.722-0.832] and 0.779 [0.721-0.831], respectively). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of bpMRI for csPCa were 74.0, 83.8, 66.9, 64.8, and 85.0%, respectively; and 73.6, 87.9, 63.2, 63.2, and 87.8%, respectively, for mpMRI. For patients with bpMRI scores ≥3, positive DCE results were more common in PCa and csPCa lesions (both P = 0.001). Further stratification analysis showed that for patients with a bpMRI score = 4, PCa and csPCa lesions were more likely to have positive DCE results (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI is comparable with that of mpMRI in the detection of PCa and the identification of csPCa. DCE MRI is helpful in further identifying PCa and csPCa lesions in patients with bpMRI ≥3, especially bpMRI = 4, which may be conducive to achieving a more accurate PCa risk stratification. Rather than omitting DCE, we think further comprehensive studies are required for prostate MRI.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies