Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

A Meta-Analysis on the Association Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Coercion Perpetration.

Tytuł :
A Meta-Analysis on the Association Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Coercion Perpetration.
Autorzy :
Trottier D; Psychoeducation and Psychology Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais.; Research Center, National Institute of Forensic Psychiatry Philippe-Pinel , Canada.
Benbouriche M; Research Center, National Institute of Forensic Psychiatry Philippe-Pinel , Canada.; EA 4072 - PSITEC - Psychologie: Interactions, Temps, Emotions, Cognition, Université de Lille , France.
Bonneville V; Psychoeducation and Psychology Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Journal of sex research [J Sex Res] 2021 Mar-Apr; Vol. 58 (3), pp. 375-382. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 22.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: Philadelphia : Routledge
Original Publication: New York, Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20191224 Latest Revision: 20210219
Update Code :
20210219
DOI :
10.1080/00224499.2019.1704677
PMID :
31865775
Czasopismo naukowe
Sexual coercion is an important public health issue. One in three women and one in ten men report having been the victim of sexual coercion. Rape myth acceptance (RMA) is recognized as a risk factor for sexual coercion perpetration. The present meta-analysis sought to establish the strength of the association between RMA and sexual coercion perpetration, and determine if the association is moderated by gender, age, sample source and year of publication, or influenced by methodological decisions. A literature search was performed through electronic platforms, Google Scholar and backward snowballing. Twenty-eight studies met full inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A random-effect meta-analysis rendered a statistically significant pooled effect size of r = .23 (95% CI = .19, .27; Z = 11.16, p < .0001). Moderator analyses performed through random-effect meta-regression revealed that age and sample source were significant moderators and that methodological decisions may impact the detection of the association. Findings from this meta-analysis expose a moderate relationship between sexual coercion perpetration and RMA which is consistent across gender and persistent over time despite social changes and on-campus efforts. These results consolidate RMA's role as a significant risk factor for sexual coercion perpetration and should promote reflection on ways of optimizing on-campus sexual coercion prevention programs.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies