Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

The association between prostate weight and positive surgical margins in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.

Tytuł :
The association between prostate weight and positive surgical margins in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.
Autorzy :
He K; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Cao ZJ; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Peng LF; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Lu YL; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wang X; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Bi LK; Departmemt of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Andrologia [Andrologia] 2020 Apr; Vol. 52 (3), pp. e13533. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 06.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article; Meta-Analysis
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: : Berlin : Blackwell Pub.
Original Publication: Berlin, Grosse
MeSH Terms :
Margins of Excision*
Prostatectomy*
Prostate/*pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms/*surgery
Humans ; Male ; Organ Size ; Prostate/surgery ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
References :
Allaparthi, S. B., Hoang, T., Dhanani, N. N., & Tuerk, I. A. (2010). Significance of prostate weight on peri and postoperative outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology, 17(5), 5383-5389.
Alukal, J. P., & Lepor, H. (2016). Testosterone deficiency and the prostate. Urologic Clinics of North America, 43(2), 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.01.013.
Butow, Z., Schunk, S., Janssen, M., Graber, S., Saar, M., Kamradt, J., … Ohlmann, C.-H. (2015). Quality of preoperative biopsy is a risk factor for positive surgical margins in organ-confined prostate cancer treated with nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis, 95(4), 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1159/000440666.
Caliskan, S., Kaba, S. L., Koca, O., & Ozturk, M. I. (2017). Does small prostate predict high grade prostate cancer? Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 27(2), 97-100.
Chang, C. M., Moon, D., Gianduzzo, T. R., & Eden, C. G. (2005). The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. European Urology, 48(2), 285-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029.
Chu, P. G., Lau, S. K., Weiss, L. M., Kawachi, M., Yoshida, J., Ruel, C., … Wilson, T. (2009). Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases. Surgical Endoscopy, 23(5), 1058-1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0131-6.
Chun, F.-H., Briganti, A., Jeldres, C., Gallina, A., Erbersdobler, A., Schlomm, T., … Karakiewicz, P. I. (2007). Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. European Journal of Cancer, 43(3), 536-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.018.
Davidson, D. D., Koch, M. O., Lin, H., Jones, T. D., Biermann, K., & Cheng, L. (2010). Does the size matter?: Prostate weight does not predict PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 133(4), 662-668. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpphgxdi94sgac.
Descazeaud, A., Zerbib, M., Vieillefond, A., Debre, B., & Peyromaure, M. (2007). The low weight of the prostate is an independent risk factor for positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy specimens. Progres en Urologie, 17(2), 203-207.
Ferro, M., Lucarelli, G., Bruzzese, D., Di Lorenzo, G., Perdonà, S., Autorino, R., … Terracciano, D. (2017). Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Oncotarget, 8(11), 18424-18434. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12906.
Foley, C. L., Bott, S. R., Thomas, K., Parkinson, M. C., & Kirby, R. S. (2003). A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU International, 92(4), 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04361.x.
Freedland, S. J., Isaacs, W. B., Platz, E. A., Terris, M. K., Aronson, W. J., Amling, C. L., … Kane, C. J. (2005). Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: A search database study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(30), 7546-7554. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.05.525.
Galfano, A., Panarello, D., Secco, S., Di Trapani, D., Barbieri, M., Napoli, G., … Bocciardi, A. M. (2018). Does prostate volume have an impact on the functional and oncological results of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica, 70(4), 408-413. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-2249.18.03069-2.
Goetzl, M. A., Krebill, R., Griebling, T. L., & Thrasher, J. B. (2009). Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical perineal prostatectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology, 16(2), 4553-4557.
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(11), 1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237.
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186.
Hong, S. K., Poon, B. Y., Sjoberg, D. D., Scardino, P. T., & Eastham, J. A. (2014). Prostate size and adverse pathologic features in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology, 84(1), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.006.
Hong, S. K., Yu, J. H., Han, B. K., Chang, I. H., Jeong, S. J., Byun, S.-S., … Lee, S. E. (2007). Association of prostate size and tumor grade in Korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology, 70(1), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.006.
Jalloh, M., Myers, F., Cowan, J. E., Carroll, P. R., & Cooperberg, M. R. (2015). Racial variation in prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging among men with low-risk clinical characteristics. European Urology, 67(3), 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.026.
Kim, M. S., Jang, W. S., Chung, D. Y., Koh, D. H., Lee, J. S., Goh, H. J., & Choi, Y. D. (2019). Effect of prostate gland weight on the surgical and oncological outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BMC Urology, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0434-4.
Koizumi, A., Narita, S., Nara, T., Takayama, K., Kanda, S., Numakura, K., … Habuchi, T. (2018). Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: A single institutional analysis. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 48(8), 765-770. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyy092.
Labanaris, A. P., Zugor, V., & Witt, J. H. (2013). Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a pathologic prostate specimen weight >/=100 grams versus https://doi.org/10.1159/000342969.
Lallas, C. D., Fashola, Y., Den, R. B., Gelpi-Hammerschmidt, F., Calvaresi, A. E., McCue, P., … Trabulsi, E. J. (2014). Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: Preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location. Canadian Journal of Urology, 21(5), 7479-7486.
Levinson, A. W., Ward, N. T., Sulman, A., Mettee, L. Z., Link, R. E., Su, L. M., & Pavlovich, C. P. (2009). The impact of prostate size on perioperative outcomes in a large laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series. Journal of Endourology, 23(1), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0366.
Liss, M., Osann, K., & Ornstein, D. (2008). Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU International, 102(5), 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07672.x.
Marchetti, P. E., Shikanov, S., Razmaria, A. A., Zagaja, G. P., & Shalhav, A. L. (2011). Impact of prostate weight on probability of positive surgical margins in patients with low-risk prostate cancer after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology, 77(3), 677-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.512.
Marker, P. C., Donjacour, A. A., Dahiya, R., & Cunha, G. R. (2003). Hormonal, cellular, and molecular control of prostatic development. Developmental Biology, 253(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-1606(02)00031-3.
Monda, J. M., Myers, R. P., Bostwick, D. G., & Oesterling, J. E. (1995). The correlation between serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer is not influenced by the serum testosterone concentration. Urology, 46(1), 62-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80160-5.
Msezane, L. P., Gofrit, O. N., Lin, S., Shalhav, A. L., Zagaja, G. P., & Zorn, K. C. (2007). Prostate weight: An independent predictor for positive surgical margins during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology, 14(5), 3697-3701.
Olsson, C. A., Lavery, H. J., Sebrow, D., Akhavan, A., Levinson, A. W., Brajtbord, J. S., … Samadi, D. B. (2011). Does size matter? The significance of prostate size on pathologic and functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Arab Journal of Urology, 9(3), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.002.
Orsini, N., Li, R., Wolk, A., Khudyakov, P., & Spiegelman, D. (2012). Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: Examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr265.
Patel, V. R., Coelho, R. F., Rocco, B., Orvieto, M., Sivaraman, A., Palmer, K. J., … Chauhan, S. (2011). Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study. Journal of Urology, 186(2), 511-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112.
Pejčić, T., Tosti, T., Tešić, Ž., Milković, B., Dragičević, D., Kozomara, M., … Džamić, Z. (2017). Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels in the transition zone correlate with prostate volume. Prostate, 77(10), 1082-1092. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23365.
Pettus, J. A., Masterson, T., Sokol, A., Cronin, A. M., Savage, C., Sandhu, J. S., … Rabbani, F. (2009). Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology, 182(3), 949-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.029.
Porcaro, A. B., Tafuri, A., Sebben, M., Corsi, P., Pocessali, T., Pirozzi, M., … Artibani, W. (2018). Positive association between preoperative total testosterone levels and risk of positive surgical margins by prostate cancer: Results in 476 consecutive patients treated only by radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis, 101(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490622.
Rabbani, F., Yunis, L. H., Vora, K., Eastham, J. A., Guillonneau, B., Scardino, P. T., & Touijer, K. (2009). Impact of ethnicity on surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. BJU International, 104(7), 904-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08550.x.
Salonia, A., Abdollah, F., Capitanio, U., Suardi, N., Briganti, A., Gallina, A., … Montorsi, F. (2012). Serum sex steroids depict a nonlinear u-shaped association with high-risk prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Clinical Cancer Research, 18(13), 3648-3657. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2799.
Shao, C. C., Luo, D., Pang, G. D., Xiao, J., Yang, X. R., Zhang, Y., & Jia, H. Y. (2019). A dose-response meta-analysis of coffee consumption and thyroid cancer occurrence. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 70(7), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2019.1646712.
Shikanov, S., Song, J., Royce, C., Al-Ahmadie, H., Zorn, K., Steinberg, G., … Eggener, S. (2009). Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. Journal of Urology, 182(1), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.139.
Smith, J. A. Jr, Chan, R. C., Chang, S. S., Herrell, S. D., Clark, P. E., Baumgartner, R., & Cookson, M. S. (2007). A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology, 178(6), 2385-2390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008.
Teloken, C., Da Ros, C. T., Caraver, F., Weber, F. A., Cavalheiro, A. P., & Graziottin, T. M. (2005). Low serum testosterone levels are associated with positive surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy: Hypogonadism represents bad prognosis in prostate cancer. Journal of Urology, 174(6), 2178-2180. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000181818.51977.29.
Uhlman, M. A., Sun, L., Stackhouse, D. A., Caire, A. A., Polascik, T. J., Robertson, C. N., … Moul, J. W. (2010). Tumor volume, tumor percentage involvement, or prostate volume: Which is predictive of prostate-specific antigen recurrence? Urology, 75(2), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.059.
Wilson, D. B. (2010). Effect size calculato. In C. Collaboration (Ed.). http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-Home.php.
Yadav, R., Tu, J. J., Jhaveri, J., Leung, R. A., Rao, S., & Tewari, A. K. (2009). Prostate volume and the incidence of extraprostatic extension: Is there a relation? Journal of Endourology, 23(3), 383-386. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0247.
Yang, R., Cao, K., Han, T., Zhang, Y.-F., Zhang, G.-T., Xu, L.-F., … Guo, H.-Q. (2017). Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian Journal of Andrology, 19(4), 468-472. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.173444.
Yasui, T., Tozawa, K., Kurokawa, S., Okada, A., Mizuno, K., Umemoto, Y., … Kohri, K. (2014). Impact of prostate weight on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a posterior approach to the seminal vesicle. BMC Urology, 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-6.
Yossepowitch, O., Briganti, A., Eastham, J. A., Epstein, J., Graefen, M., Montironi, R., & Touijer, K. (2014). Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and contemporary update. European Urology, 65(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.039.
Zagars, G. K., Pollack, A., & von Eschenbach, A. C. (1997). Serum testosterone-a significant determinant of metastatic relapse for irradiated localized prostate cancer. Urology, 49(3), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00619-x.
Zorn, K. C., Orvieto, M. A., Mikhail, A. A., Gofrit, O. N., Lin, S., Schaeffer, A. J., … Zagaja, G. P. (2007). Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology, 69(2), 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.021.
Grant Information :
81572507 National natural science foundation of China
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: dose-response; meta-analysis; prostate weight; prostatectomy; surgical margins
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20200207 Date Completed: 20201124 Latest Revision: 20201124
Update Code :
20210210
DOI :
10.1111/and.13533
PMID :
32027043
Czasopismo naukowe
There have been some conflicting claims whether larger prostate weight (PW) reduces the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). This study aims to examine the associations between PW and PSMs. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane library were systematically retrieved. Relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesised utilising random-effect models. Ultimately, 22 cohort studies met criteria were enrolled in this meta-analysis, of which 18 studies reporting the RR of the highest VS lowest category of PW yielded the combined RR of PSMs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.50-0.74). Subgroup analysis showed that geographic region and surgical modalities were considered as potential confounders of influence of PW on PSMs. The nonlinear dose-response relationship demonstrated that PSM risk decreased by 1% (RR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) for every one gram increment in PW. This study suggests PW has a negative association with risk of PSMs, and having a appropriate PW is very important.
(© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.)
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies