Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Effect of Different Types of Messages on Readiness to Indicate Willingness to Register for Organ Donation During Driver's License Renewal in Japan.

Tytuł:
Effect of Different Types of Messages on Readiness to Indicate Willingness to Register for Organ Donation During Driver's License Renewal in Japan.
Autorzy:
Hirai K; Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Ohtake F; Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kudo T; Faculty of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ito T; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Sasaki S; Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yamazaki G; Center for the Study of Co* Design, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Eguchi Y; Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Źródło:
Transplantation [Transplantation] 2020 Dec; Vol. 104 (12), pp. 2591-2598.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins.
MeSH Terms:
Automobile Driving*
Choice Behavior*
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
Licensure*
Pamphlets*
Reminder Systems*
Tissue and Organ Procurement*
Tissue Donors/*psychology
Adult ; Aged ; Attitude to Death ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Tokyo ; Young Adult
References:
The Japan Organ Transplantation Network. The number of waiting list for organ transplantation (from 1997 to 2018). 2019. Available at https://www.jotnw.or.jp/assets/docs/data/index/transplant-registry2018.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2019.
The Japan Society for Transplantation. Fact book 2018 of organ transplantation in Japan. 2018. Available at http://www.asas.or.jp/jst/pdf/factbook/factbook2018.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2019.
International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation. Database. International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation website. 2018. Available at http://www.irodat.org/. Accessed December 17, 2019.
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Public opinion survey on the transplant medicine (Public Opinion Report, conducted August 2017). 2017. Available at https://survey.gov-online.go.jp/h29/h29-ishoku/index.html. Accessed November 4, 2018.
Radecki CM, Jaccard J. Psychological aspects of organ donation: a critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol. 1997;16:183–195.
O’Carroll RE, Foster C, McGeechan G, et al. The “ick” factor, anticipated regret, and willingness to become an organ donor. Health Psychol. 2011;30:236–245.
Allcot H. Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ. 2011;95:1082–1095.
Hallsworth M, List J, Metcalfe R, et al. The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J Public Econ. 2017;148:14–31.
Reinhart AM, Marshall HM, Feeley TH, et al. The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: the mediating role of psychological reactance. Commun Monogr. 2007;74:229–255.
McGregor LM, Ferguson E, O’Carroll RE. Living organ donation: the effect of message frame on an altruistic behaviour. J Health Psychol. 2012;17:821–832.
Behavioural Insights Team, Department of Health. Applying behavioural insights to organ donation: preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial. 2013. Available at https://38r8om2xjhhl25mw24492dir-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Applying_Behavioural_Insights_to_Organ_Donation_report.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2018.
O’Carroll RE, Haddow L, Foley L, et al. If you needed an organ transplant would you have one? The effect of reciprocity priming and mode of delivery on organ donor registration intentions and behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2017;22:577–588.
Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:101–116.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ. 1991;106:1039–1061.
Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12:38–48.
Hirai K, Harada K, Seki A, et al. Structural equation modeling for implementation intentions, cancer worry, and stages of mammography adoption. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2339–2346.
Suggs LS, McIntyre C, Warburton W, et al. Communicating health messages: a framework to increase the effectiveness of health communication globally. Report of the WISH communicating complex. Qatar Foundation website. 2015. Available at https://www.wish.org.qa/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WISH_CCHM_Forum_Report_08.01.15_WEB_2.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2019.
Roskos-Ewoldsen DR, Yu J, Rhodes N. Fear appeal messages affect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Commun Monogr. 2004;71:51–71.
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200215 Date Completed: 20210208 Latest Revision: 20210208
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1097/TP.0000000000003181
PMID:
32058465
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: In Japan, a recent opinion poll in 2017 showed that 41.9% of the respondents wished to donate their organs, but only 12.7% declared their intention to donate or not do so. Therefore, it is important to explore measures to prompt more individuals to register their intention about organ donation.
Methods: A field experimental questionnaire survey was conducted to confirm the effect of a prompt message for registering intentions for organ donation, which was communicated at a driver's license center. The study employed a prospective randomized control design. Seven thousand six hundred fifteen individuals visited the Tokyo Fuchu License Examination Center to update their driver's license and received leaflets including a message prompting organ donation registration and the questionnaire. Of the participants who received leaflets, 3224 respondents provided complete responses to the questionnaire (valid response rate: 42.3%). Subsequently, a questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the participants' willingness to register for organ donation. A control condition and the following types of messages were used: peer-framed, gain-framed, loss-framed, reciprocity-framed, and peer + reciprocity-framed.
Results: The reciprocity message emerged as a significant predictor of increase in immediate decision response. The loss-framed message was a significant predictor of decrease in no intention to register.
Conclusions: This study found that reciprocity and loss-framed messages promoted the readiness to register for organ donation among individuals from a Japanese urban area. Mandatory distribution of prompt messages at every driver's license centers in Japan would be recommended.
Comment in: Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):2467-2468. (PMID: 32058467)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies