Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Phenotype-based probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy.

Tytuł:
Phenotype-based probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy.
Autorzy:
Comandante-Lou N; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Khaliq M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.; Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Venkat D; Department of Biochemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Manikkam M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Fallahi-Sichani M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.; Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.; Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Źródło:
PLoS computational biology [PLoS Comput Biol] 2020 Feb 21; Vol. 16 (2), pp. e1007688. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 21 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, [2005]-
MeSH Terms:
Drug Interactions*
Drug Therapy, Combination*
Probability*
Antineoplastic Agents/*therapeutic use
Neoplasms/*drug therapy
Neoplasms/*physiopathology
Cell Line, Tumor ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Melanoma/drug therapy ; Melanoma/physiopathology ; Models, Statistical ; Phenotype ; Poisson Distribution
References:
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 6;38(1):56. (PMID: 30728057)
Mol Syst Biol. 2015 Mar 26;11(3):797. (PMID: 25814555)
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 1;31(9):1105-16. (PMID: 21765463)
Nat Methods. 2016 Jun;13(6):497-500. (PMID: 27135974)
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Nov;9(11):669-70. (PMID: 24141220)
Science. 2014 Dec 19;346(6216):1480-6. (PMID: 25394791)
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb 1;304(3):E237-53. (PMID: 23211518)
Cancer Discov. 2019 Apr;9(4):526-545. (PMID: 30709805)
Nat Med. 2016 May 5;22(5):472-8. (PMID: 27149220)
Cancer Cell. 2018 Feb 12;33(2):322-336.e8. (PMID: 29438700)
Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Jan 9;13(1):905. (PMID: 28069687)
Mol Cell. 2018 Aug 16;71(4):581-591.e5. (PMID: 30057196)
Methods. 2017 Feb 15;115:80-90. (PMID: 27713081)
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Sep;7(9):2876-83. (PMID: 18790768)
Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 1;79(11):2947-2961. (PMID: 30987999)
Science. 2008 Dec 5;322(5907):1511-6. (PMID: 19023046)
EMBO Mol Med. 2018 May;10(5):. (PMID: 29650805)
Cancer Cell. 2013 Jun 10;23(6):811-25. (PMID: 23764003)
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jul;88(1):34-8. (PMID: 20520606)
Nat Methods. 2016 Jun;13(6):521-7. (PMID: 27135972)
Cell. 2008 Feb 8;132(3):487-98. (PMID: 18267078)
Cell. 2010 Apr 2;141(1):69-80. (PMID: 20371346)
Cell. 2017 Dec 14;171(7):1678-1691.e13. (PMID: 29245013)
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 19;7:10690. (PMID: 26891683)
Cell Syst. 2019 Feb 27;8(2):97-108.e16. (PMID: 30797775)
PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 2;6(12):2831-52. (PMID: 19053173)
Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2018 Aug;10:1-8. (PMID: 30740553)
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Nov;9(11):708-14. (PMID: 24013279)
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82. (PMID: 22743772)
Nature. 2017 Nov 9;551(7679):247-250. (PMID: 29088702)
Nat Methods. 2012 Sep;9(9):923-8. (PMID: 22886092)
Biochem Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 15;122:1-9. (PMID: 27349985)
Cell. 2018 May 31;173(6):1413-1425.e14. (PMID: 29754815)
Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22:27-55. (PMID: 6382953)
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):232-4. (PMID: 26937615)
Pharmacol Rev. 1989 Jun;41(2):93-141. (PMID: 2692037)
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3709-14. (PMID: 18669456)
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015 Sep 25;13:504-13. (PMID: 26949479)
Cancer Cell. 2008 Aug 12;14(2):111-22. (PMID: 18656424)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 10;106(6):1826-31. (PMID: 19188593)
Bacteriol Rev. 1956 Dec;20(4):243-58. (PMID: 13403845)
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):843-855.e19. (PMID: 30017245)
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 20;8:158. (PMID: 28473769)
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Oct 01;11(10):. (PMID: 31581557)
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Jun;3(3):e00149. (PMID: 26171228)
Pharmacol Rev. 1995 Jun;47(2):331-85. (PMID: 7568331)
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1972 Oct;56(5):563-71. (PMID: 4652587)
Nature. 2017 Jun 15;546(7658):431-435. (PMID: 28607484)
Biophys Rev. 2013 Dec;5(4):323-345. (PMID: 28510113)
Cancer Cell. 2012 Apr 17;21(4):547-62. (PMID: 22516262)
Grant Information:
P30 CA046592 United States CA NCI NIH HHS; R00 CA194163 United States CA NCI NIH HHS; R35 GM133404 United States GM NIGMS NIH HHS
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Antineoplastic Agents)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200222 Date Completed: 20200506 Latest Revision: 20201207
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7055924
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007688
PMID:
32084135
Czasopismo naukowe
Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish the efficacy of cancer drugs. Efficacious combination therapies are thus needed to block drug-tolerant cells via minimizing the impact of heterogeneity. Probabilistic models such as Bliss independence have been developed to evaluate drug interactions and their combination efficacy based on probabilities of specific actions mediated by drugs individually and in combination. In practice, however, these models are often applied to conventional dose-response curves in which a normalized parameter with a value between zero and one, generally referred to as fraction of cells affected (fa), is used to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined interactions. We use basic probability theory, computer simulations, time-lapse live cell microscopy, and single-cell analysis to show that fa metrics may bias our assessment of drug efficacy and combination effectiveness. This bias may be corrected when dynamic probabilities of drug-induced phenotypic events, i.e. induction of cell death and inhibition of division, at a single-cell level are used as metrics to assess drug efficacy. Probabilistic phenotype metrics offer the following three benefits. First, in contrast to the commonly used fa metrics, they directly represent probabilities of drug action in a cell population. Therefore, they deconvolve differential degrees of drug effect on tumor cell killing versus inhibition of cell division, which may not be correlated for many drugs. Second, they increase the sensitivity of short-term drug response assays to cell-to-cell heterogeneities and the presence of drug-tolerant subpopulations. Third, their probabilistic nature allows them to be used directly in unbiased evaluation of synergistic efficacy in drug combinations using probabilistic models such as Bliss independence. Altogether, we envision that probabilistic analysis of single-cell phenotypes complements currently available assays via improving our understanding of heterogeneity in drug response, thereby facilitating the discovery of more efficacious combination therapies to block drug-tolerant cells.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies