Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Signalling profiles of a structurally diverse panel of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.

Tytuł:
Signalling profiles of a structurally diverse panel of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.
Autorzy:
Patel M; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Manning JJ; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Finlay DB; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Javitch JA; Department of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States; Division of Molecular Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Banister SD; Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Grimsey NL; Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Glass M; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Electronic address: .
Źródło:
Biochemical pharmacology [Biochem Pharmacol] 2020 May; Vol. 175, pp. 113871. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 21.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Oxford : Elsevier Science
Original Publication: Oxford, New York [etc.] Paragamon Press.
MeSH Terms:
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/*pharmacology
Cannabinoids/*pharmacology
Designer Drugs/*pharmacology
Indoles/*pharmacology
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/*metabolism
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2/*metabolism
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/chemistry ; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists/metabolism ; Cannabinoids/chemistry ; Cannabinoids/metabolism ; Cyclic AMP ; Designer Drugs/chemistry ; Designer Drugs/metabolism ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; HEK293 Cells ; Humans ; Indoles/chemistry ; Indoles/metabolism ; Ligands ; Protein Transport ; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1/genetics ; Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2/genetics ; Signal Transduction ; Transfection ; beta-Arrestins/metabolism
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Cannabinoid receptor; Ligand bias; Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist; THC; β-Arrestin
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (5F-CUMYL-P7AICA)
0 (Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists)
0 (Cannabinoids)
0 (Designer Drugs)
0 (Indoles)
0 (Ligands)
0 (Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1)
0 (Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2)
0 (beta-Arrestins)
E0399OZS9N (Cyclic AMP)
L2M8B977ZE (XLR-11)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200224 Date Completed: 20201029 Latest Revision: 20201029
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113871
PMID:
32088263
Czasopismo naukowe
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) represent the most rapidly proliferating class of "designer drugs" or "new psychoactive substances". SCRAs offer unregulated alternatives to cannabis that evade routine drug tests, but their use is increasingly associated with severe toxicity and death worldwide. Little is currently known about SCRA molecular pharmacology, or the mechanisms underpinning their toxicity, although the effects are believed to be primarily mediated by the type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB 1 ). In this study, we aimed to characterise the signalling profiles of a structurally diverse panel of novel SCRAs at CB 1 . We compare SCRAs to traditional reference cannabinoids CP55,940, WIN55,212-2, and THC. The activity of the SCRAs was assessed in key receptor signalling and regulatory pathways, including cAMP production, translocation of β-arrestin 1 and 2, and receptor internalisation. The activity profiles of the ligands were also evaluated using operational analysis to identify ligand bias. Results revealed that SCRAs activities were relatively balanced in the pathways evaluated (compared to WIN55,212-2), although 5F-CUMYL-P7AICA and XLR-11 possessed partial efficacy in cAMP stimulation and β-arrestin translocation. Notably, the SCRAs showed distinct potency and efficacy profiles compared to THC. In particular, while the majority of SCRAs demonstrated robust β-arrestin translocation, cAMP stimulation, and internalisation, THC failed to elicit high efficacy responses in any of these assays. Further study is required to delineate if these pathways could contribute to SCRA toxicity in humans.
(Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies