Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.

Tytuł:
Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.
Autorzy:
Kaspers M; Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Llamocca E; Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Quick A; Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Dholakia J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Salani R; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Felix AS; Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: .
Źródło:
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2020 Sep; Vol. 223 (3), pp. 398.e1-398.e18. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 03.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: <2005->: New York : Elsevier
Original Publication: St. Louis.
MeSH Terms:
Carcinoma, Endometrioid/*therapy
Endometrial Neoplasms/*therapy
Guideline Adherence/*statistics & numerical data
Healthcare Disparities/*ethnology
Adult ; Black or African American ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid/ethnology ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality ; Endometrial Neoplasms/ethnology ; Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Hispanic or Latino ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Minority Groups ; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander ; Neoplasm Staging ; Odds Ratio ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Survival Rate ; White People
References:
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Apr 1;110(4):354-361. (PMID: 29045681)
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Feb;26(2):282-9. (PMID: 26745698)
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 15;21(22):4200-6. (PMID: 14615448)
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Feb;23(2):138-45. (PMID: 24261647)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. (PMID: 30620402)
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):114-121. (PMID: 28159409)
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jul;122(1):63-8. (PMID: 21463888)
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):741-8. (PMID: 15721420)
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 May 1;121(2):364-8. (PMID: 21288564)
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2874-80. (PMID: 27325865)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):753-60. (PMID: 22426148)
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2607-18. (PMID: 23733771)
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Mar;22(3):389-95. (PMID: 17356974)
Lancet. 2010 Mar 6;375(9717):816-23. (PMID: 20206777)
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1895-1908. (PMID: 31116674)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):459.e1-459.e11. (PMID: 30096321)
Med Oncol. 2018 Jun 20;35(7):113. (PMID: 29926275)
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):380-385. (PMID: 28552255)
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Aug;122(2):319-23. (PMID: 21632099)
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017727104. (PMID: 28856941)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Sep;24(9):1407-15. (PMID: 26290568)
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May;129(2):277-84. (PMID: 23485770)
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):295-309. (PMID: 29449189)
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):207-16. (PMID: 23588954)
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Mar;92(3):744-51. (PMID: 14984936)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Nov;23(11):2206-7. (PMID: 25368395)
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(4):482-491. (PMID: 28543055)
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1226-1234. (PMID: 23812456)
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):429-33. (PMID: 26024766)
Int J Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;147(2):404-412. (PMID: 31618444)
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1504-10. (PMID: 21530238)
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):98-104. (PMID: 27470998)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 May;66(3):182-202. (PMID: 26766789)
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):171-4. (PMID: 23103929)
Lancet. 2000 Apr 22;355(9213):1404-11. (PMID: 10791524)
Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):137-46. (PMID: 19070891)
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1025-1032. (PMID: 24104782)
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Nov;71(2):151-8. (PMID: 9826453)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):627.e1-9. (PMID: 24954655)
Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1276-85. (PMID: 19204905)
Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2104-11. (PMID: 15569961)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Mar;28(3):539-545. (PMID: 30487136)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Nov;95 Suppl 1:S105-43. (PMID: 17161155)
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2317-2326. (PMID: 31189035)
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):843-851. (PMID: 25751197)
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104 Suppl 4:S562-71. (PMID: 25100422)
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):196-201. (PMID: 16579829)
Grant Information:
K01 CA218457 United States CA NCI NIH HHS
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: chemotherapy; disparities; guideline-concordant treatment; hospital-based cancer registry; race; radiation treatment; uterus neoplasm
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200307 Date Completed: 20201112 Latest Revision: 20221207
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7483220
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.041
PMID:
32142825
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Differences in receipt of guideline-concordant treatment might underlie well-established racial disparities in endometrial cancer mortality.
Objective: Using the National Cancer Database, we assessed the hypothesis that among women with endometrioid endometrial cancer, racial/ethnic minority women would have lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment than white women. In addition, we hypothesized that lack of guideline-concordant treatment was linked with worse survival.
Study Design: We defined receipt of guideline-concordant treatment using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and guideline-concordant treatment. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for relationships between guideline-concordant treatment and overall survival in the overall study population and stratified by race/ethnicity.
Results: This analysis was restricted to the 89,319 women diagnosed with an invasive, endometrioid endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 74.7% of the cohort received guideline-concordant treatment (n = 66,699). Analyses stratified by race showed that 75.3% of non-Hispanic white (n = 57,442), 70.1% of non-Hispanic black (n = 4334), 71.0% of Hispanic (n = 3263), and 72.5% of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 1660) received treatment in concordance with guidelines. In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic black (odds ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98) and Hispanic women (odds ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence internal, 0.83-0.97) had lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment compared with non-Hispanic white women, while Asian/Pacific Islander women had a higher odds of receiving guideline-concordant treatment (odds ratio, 1.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.23). Lack of guideline-concordant treatment was associated with lower overall survival in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.12, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.15) but was not significantly associated with overall survival among non-Hispanic black (hazard ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.21), Hispanic (hazard ratio, 0.92, 95% confidence interval=0.78-1.09), or Asian/Pacific Islander (hazard ratio, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16) women.
Conclusion: Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women were less likely than non-Hispanic white women to receive guideline-concordant treatment, while Asian/Pacific Islander women more commonly received treatment in line with guidelines. Furthermore, in the overall study population, overall survival was worse among those not receiving guideline-concordant treatment, although low power may have had an impact on the race-stratified models. Future studies should evaluate reasons underlying disparate endometrial cancer treatment.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies