Debating Deinfibulation: Why Some Women Resist the WHO Advice and What Clinicians and Researchers Can Do.

Szczegóły
Comments

Tytuł:: Debating Deinfibulation: Why Some Women Resist the WHO Advice and What Clinicians and Researchers Can Do.
Autorzy:: Gruenbaum E; Department of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. .
Źródło:: Archives of sexual behavior [Arch Sex Behav] 2021 Jul; Vol. 50 (5), pp. 1929-1934. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 09.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article; Comment
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Publication: 1999- : New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
Original Publication: New York, Plenum Pub. Corp.
MeSH Terms:: World Health Organization*
Female ; Humans
References:: Abdulcadir, J., Boulvain, M., & Petignat, P. (2012). Reconstructive surgery for female genital mutilation. The Lancet, 380(5), 90–92. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60636-9)
Abdulcadir, J., Catania, L., Hindin, M. J., Say, L., Petignat, P., & Abdulcadir, O. (2016a). Female genital mutilation: A visual reference and learning tool for health care professionals. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 128(5), 958–963. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001686)
Abdulcadir, J., McLaren, S., Boulvain, M., & Irion, O. (2016b). Health education and clinical care of immigrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting who request postpartum reinfibulation. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 135, 69–72. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.027)
Boddy, J. (2016). The normal and the aberrant in female genital cutting. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(2), 41–69. (PMID: 10.14318/hau6.2.008)
Brady, S., Connor, J., Chaisson, N., Mohamed, F. S., & Robinson, B. E. (2019). Female genital cutting and deinfibulation: Applying the theory of planned behavior to research and practice. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1427-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10508-019-1427-4315916668240838)
Foldès, P., Cuzin, B., & Andro, A. (2012). Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet, 380, 134–141. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60400-0)
Gruenbaum, E. (1994). Female circumcision: Beliefs and misbeliefs (film review). American Anthropologist, 96(2), 488–489. (PMID: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.2.02a00560)
Gruenbaum, E. (2001). The female circumcision controversy: An anthropological perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. (PMID: 10.9783/9780812292510)
Gruenbaum, E. (2008). Patterns of female genital cutting in Sierra Leone: A preliminary study. Freetown: UNICEF Sierra Leone.
Gruenbaum, E. (2018). Qualitative research on the effectiveness of FGM/C prevention strategies in Sudan, 2004–2017. Paper presented at the International Expert Meeting on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting, Montréal, Québec.
Lightfoot-Klein, H. (1989). Prisoners of ritual: An odyssey into female genital circumcision in Africa. New York: Harrington Park Press.
Nour, N. M., Michels, K. B., & Bryant, A. E. (2006). Defibulation to treat female genital cutting: Effect on symptoms and sexual function. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108, 55–60. (PMID: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224613.72892.77)
Shell-Duncan, B., & Hernlund, Y. (2006). Are there “stages of change” in the practice of female genital cutting? Qualitative research findings from Senegal and The Gambia. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 10(2), 57–71. (PMID: 10.2307/30032459)
Walker, A., & Parmar, P. (1993). Warrior marks: Female genital mutilation and the sexual blinding of women. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20200411 Date Completed: 20210802 Latest Revision: 20210802
Update Code:: 20240105
DOI:: 10.1007/s10508-020-01692-0
PMID:: 32274745
: Czasopismo naukowe

Full Text Finder

Comment on: Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1913-1927. (PMID: 31359211)
Comment in: Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1963-1971. (PMID: 34155578)

Informacja