Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Changes in P1 latencies of children with normal hearing and those with cochlear implants

Tytuł :
Changes in P1 latencies of children with normal hearing and those with cochlear implants
Autorzy :
Eskicioğlu E; Unit of Hearing, Speech and Balance, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
Kirkim G; Unit of Hearing, Speech and Balance, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
Gürkan S; Unit of Hearing, Speech and Balance, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
Mungan Durankaya S; Unit of Hearing, Speech and Balance, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
Başokçu TO; Department of Assessment and Evaluation in Education, School of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey
Güneri EA; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Turkish journal of medical sciences [Turk J Med Sci] 2020 Jun 23; Vol. 50 (4), pp. 1062-1068. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 23.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: Ankara : Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, [1994-
References :
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8. (PMID: 1736364)
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Aug;48(4):853-67. (PMID: 16378478)
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Jul-Aug;6(4):211-5. (PMID: 11694730)
Ear Hear. 2002 Dec;23(6):532-9. (PMID: 12476090)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):648-57. (PMID: 15721079)
Codas. 2013;25(6):521-6. (PMID: 24626977)
Hear Res. 2006 Feb;212(1-2):212-23. (PMID: 16480841)
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Sep;16(8):564-73. (PMID: 16295243)
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Feb;95(2):135-44. (PMID: 24780192)
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Nov-Dec;6(6):346-62. (PMID: 11847463)
Ear Hear. 2018 Jan/Feb;39(1):150-160. (PMID: 28753163)
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002 May;189:38-41. (PMID: 12018346)
Hear Res. 2006 Feb;212(1-2):185-202. (PMID: 16459037)
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Nov;104(6):540-5. (PMID: 9402896)
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb 22;:. (PMID: 30926456)
Neuroreport. 1996 Dec 20;8(1):61-5. (PMID: 9051753)
Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. (PMID: 15855038)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Dec;111(12):2268-76. (PMID: 11090781)
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;64:66-88. (PMID: 16891837)
Neuroreport. 2002 Jul 19;13(10):1365-8. (PMID: 12151804)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Feb;111(2):220-36. (PMID: 10680557)
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517744094. (PMID: 29205100)
J Commun Disord. 2007 Jul-Aug;40(4):284-94. (PMID: 17433357)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: children*; cochlear implantation*; normal hearing*; Cortical auditory evoked potentials*; P1 latency*
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20200415 Latest Revision: 20210215
Update Code :
20210623
PubMed Central ID :
PMC7379475
DOI :
10.3906/sag-1910-233
PMID :
32283893
Czasopismo naukowe
Background/aim: The aim of this study was to determine the age-related latency interval of P1 latencies of children with normal hearing, and to evaluate the P1 latency changes after surgery in children who underwent cochlear implantation.
Materials and Methods: We evaluated 60 children with normal hearing and 16 children with cochlear implants aged 0–6 years using cortical auditory evoked potentials. P1 latencies were measured only once in the children with normal hearing, and on the postoperative first day, and the first, third, and sixth postoperative months in the children with cochlear implants.
Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in the P1 latencies as the age increased in children with normal hearing (P < 0.001). It was determined that when the external partof the cochlear implant was applied, the P1 latencies of children with cochlear implants were significantly longer than those of age-matched children with normal hearing (P < 0.001). This difference disappeared in 10 children with implants at the third and sixth months, but significant differences remained in 6 children.
Conclusion: P1 latency could be used as an objective tool to evaluate the normal development of auditory pathways, and may be helpful in the effective programming of children undergoing cochlear implantation.
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies