Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Dyadic latent profile analyses and multilevel modeling to examine differential response to couple relationship education.

Tytuł:
Dyadic latent profile analyses and multilevel modeling to examine differential response to couple relationship education.
Autorzy:
Roberson PNE; College of Nursing.
Lenger KA; Department of Psychology.
Gray T; Department of Psychology.
Cordova J; Department of Psychology.
Gordon KC; Department of Psychology.
Źródło:
Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) [J Fam Psychol] 2020 Oct; Vol. 34 (7), pp. 879-885. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 07.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association
Original Publication: [Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications, c1987-
MeSH Terms:
Couples Therapy*
Psychotherapy, Brief*
Social Interaction*
Sexual Partners/*psychology
Spouses/*psychology
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Multilevel Analysis
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200508 Date Completed: 20210216 Latest Revision: 20210216
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1037/fam0000667
PMID:
32378927
Czasopismo naukowe
There are mixed evaluations of couple relationship education indicating that these types of interventions may be more or less effective depending on the couple type and demographic differences. However, this ambiguity requires more investigation with advanced statistical analyses that use a person-centered approach such as mixture modeling. We tested this hypothesis with a sample of different-sex couples ( N = 455 couples) who participated in a brief in-home couple intervention. We used dyadic latent profile analysis to determine possible relationship health typologies (RHTs) of presenting couples and multilevel models to examine differential intervention effectiveness between these RHTs. Results indicated there were 3 RHT: Partners Below Average with Wife Much Lower RHT (18%), Partners Below Average with Men Slightly Lower RHT (26%), and Partner Both Above Average RHT, (56%). RHTs did not differ by demographics. Below Average and Wife Lower RHTs responded the best to the brief couple intervention. In sum, we find that a brief intervention that targets the specific concerns of the couples may improve outcomes for multiple RHT. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies