Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

An Overview of 3D Printing in Forensic Science: The Tangible Third-Dimension.

Tytuł :
An Overview of 3D Printing in Forensic Science: The Tangible Third-Dimension.
Autorzy :
Carew RM; Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, U.K.; Centre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, U.K.
Errickson D; Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, U.K.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Journal of forensic sciences [J Forensic Sci] 2020 Sep; Vol. 65 (5), pp. 1752-1760. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 13.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Publication: 2006- : Malden, MA : Blackwell Pub.
Original Publication: [Chicago, Ill.] : Callaghan and Co., 1956-
References :
Ballard DH, Trace AP, Ali S, Hodgdon T, Zygmont ME, DeBenedectis CM, et al. Clinical applications of 3D printing: primer for radiologists. Acad Radiol 2018;25(1):52-65.
Hodgdon T, Danrad R, Patel MJ, Smith SE, Richardson ML, Ballard DH, et al. Logistics of three-dimensional printing: primer for radiologists. Acad Radiol 2018;25(1):40-51.
Carew RM, Errickson D. Imaging in forensic science: five years on. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2019;16:24-33.
Carew RM, Morgan RM, Rando C. A Preliminary investigation into the accuracy of 3D modeling and 3D printing in forensic anthropology evidence reconstruction. J Forensic Sci 2019;64(2):342-52.
Morgan RM. Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: a conceptual model. Sci Justice 2017;57(6):455-9.
3D Hubs. What is 3D printing? The definitive guide, 2018. https://www.3dhubs.com/guides/3d-printing/ (accessed May 20, 2019).
Stratasys Ltd. Stratasys medical regulatory information, 2020. https://www.stratasys.com/fda-cleared-3d-printing-solutions (accessed March 31, 2020).
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Technical considerations for additive manufactured devices. Guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff, 2017. https://www.fda.gov/media/97633/download (accessed April 1, 2020).
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 3D printing of medical devices, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures/3d-printing-medical-devices (accessed March 31, 2020).
Lozano MTU, D'Amato R, Ruggiero A, Manzoor S, Haro FB, Méndez JAJ. A study evaluating the level of satisfaction of the students of health sciences about the use of 3D printed bone models. In: García-Peñalvo FJ, editor. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2018); 2018 Oct 24-26 Salamanca, Spain. New York, NY: ACM, 2018;368-72.
McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7(6):479-86.
Barrera CA, Silvestro E, Calle-Toro JS, Scribano PV, Wood JN, Henry MK, et al. Three-dimensional printed models of the rib cage in children with non-accidental injury as an effective visual-aid tool. Pediatr Radiol 2019;49:965-70.
Chaudhary R, Doggalli N, Chandrakant HV, Patil K. Current and evolving applications of three-dimensional printing in forensic odontology: a review. Int J Forensic Odontol 2018;3(2):59-65.
Ford JM, Decker SJ. Computed tomography slice thickness and its effects on three-dimensional reconstruction of anatomical structures. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2016;4:43-6.
Guyomarc'h P, Santos F, Dutailly B, Desbarats P, Bou C, Coqueugniot H. Three-dimensional computer-assisted craniometrics: a comparison of the uncertainty in measurement induced by surface reconstruction performed by two computer programs. Forensic Sci Int 2012;219(1-3):221-7.
Eyre M, Foster P, Speake G, Coggan J. Integration of laser scanning and three-dimensional models in the legal process following an industrial accident. Saf Health Work 2017;8(3):306-14.
Liscio E. Forensic uses of 3D printing. Forensic Magazine, 2013. http://web.archive.org/web/20161216150333/www.forensicmag.com/article/2013/06/forensic-uses-3d-printing (accessed April 1, 2020).
Moran BR. Shooting incident reconstruction: Part I. In: Chisum WJ, Turvey BE, editors. Crime reconstruction, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2011;365-421.
Sun L, Fukuda T, Tokuhara T, Yabuki N. Difference between a physical model and a virtual environment as regards perception of scale. In: Stouffs R, Janssen P, Roudavski S, Tunçer B, editors. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA); 2013 May 15-18; Singapore. Hong Kong: The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 2013;457-66.
Villa C, Olsen KB, Hansen SH. Virtual animation of victim-specific 3D models obtained from CT scans for forensic reconstructions: living and dead subjects. Forensic Sci Int 2017;278:e27-33.
Baier W, Warnett JM, Payne M, Williams MA. Introducing 3D printed models as demonstrative evidence at criminal trials. J Forensic Sci 2018;63(4):1298-302.
Baier W, Norman DG, Warnett JM, Payne M, Harrison NP, Hunt NCA, et al. Novel application of three-dimensional technologies in a case of dismemberment. Forensic Sci Int 2017;270:139-45.
Woźniak K, Rzepecka-Woźniak E, Moskała A, Pohl J, Latacz K, Dybała B. Weapon identification using antemortem computed tomography with virtual 3D and rapid prototype modeling - a report in a case of blunt force head injury. Forensic Sci Int 2012;222(1-3):e29-32.
Chase RJ, LaPorte G. The next generation of crime tools and challenges: 3D printing. NIJ Journal, 2017. https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/next-generation-of-crime-tools-and-challenges-3d-printing.aspx?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=nijjournal (accessed March 10, 2020).
Drupa. Forensic uses for 3D printing, 2015. https://blog.drupa.com/de/forensic-3d-printing/ (accessed May 20, 2019).
Bennett MR, Huddart D, Gonzalez S. Preservation and analysis of three-dimensional footwear evidence in soils: the application of optical laser scanning. In: Ritz K, Dawson L, Miller D, editors. Criminal and environmental soil forensics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009;445-61.
Gamage RE, Joshi A, Zheng JY, Tuceryan M. A 3D Impression acquisition system for forensic applications. In: Jiang X, Bellon ORP, Goldgof D, Oishi T, editors. Advances in depth image analysis and applications WDIA 2012. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2013;9-20.
Buck U, Albertini N, Naether S, Thali MJ. 3D documentation of footwear impressions and tyre tracks in snow with high resolution optical surface scanning. Forensic Sci Int 2007;171(2-3):157-64.
Thompson TJU, Norris P. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning. Sci Justice 2018;58(3):237-43.
Komar DA, Davy-Jow S, Decker SJ. The use of a 3-D laser scanner to document ephemeral evidence at crime scenes and postmortem examinations. J Forensic Sci 2012;57(1):188-91.
Liscio E. Forensic 3D printing workflow, 2015. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1677864668?accountid=14511 (accessed March 10, 2020).
Baier W, Rando C. Developing the use of structure-from-motion in mass grave documentation. Forensic Sci Int 2016;261:19-25.
McPherron SP, Gernat T, Hublin J-J. Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds. J Archaeol Sci 2009;36(1):19-24.
Friedman A. 3D print of one of the recently excavated #Roman #burials from the Newington Hotel development in York. Ongoing analysis of the remains yielding some fascinating information about life in Eboracum. via York Archaeological Trust on FB. Twitter, 2018. https://twitter.com/TheGraveWarden/status/996964294423121920?s=03 (accessed August 3, 2018).
Koslow T. 3D Scans and prints two shipwrecks from underwater archaeological sites in UK. Wessex Archaeology, 2016. https://3dprint.com/135652/wessex-archaeology-shipwreck/ (accessed November 19, 2018).
Newton M. 3D printing, 2018. http://orkneyliving.co.uk/3d-printing (accessed November 19, 2018).
Ebert LC, Thali MJ, Ross S. Getting in touch-3D printing in forensic imaging. Forensic Sci Int 2011;211(1-3):e1-6.
Garcia J, Yang Z, Mongrain R, Leask RL, Lachapelle K. 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2018;4(1):27-40.
Dhumale SR, Barraclough TW, Stokes A, Lam W. Producing 3D printed hand models for anatomy education using cadaveric dissection: a feasibility study. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2018;100(5):217-22.
Edwards J, Rogers T. The accuracy and applicability of 3D modeling and printing blunt force cranial injuries. J Forensic Sci 2018;63(3):683-91.
Errickson D, Thompson TJU, Rankin BWJ. The application of 3D visualization of osteological trauma for the courtroom: a critical review. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2014;2(3):132-7.
Jones DG. Three-dimensional printing in anatomy education: assessing potential ethical dimensions. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12(4):435-43.
Blau S, Phillips E, O’Donnell C, Markowsky G. Evaluating the impact of different formats in the presentation of trauma evidence in court: a pilot study. Aust J Forensic Sci 2018;51(6):695-704.
Wilhelmson H, Dell'Unto N. Virtual taphonomy: a new method integrating excavation and postprocessing in an archaeological context. Am J Phys Anthropol 2015;157(2):305-21.
Carlton CD, Mitchell S, Lewis P. Preliminary application of structure from motion and GIS to document decomposition and taphonomic processes. Forensic Sci Int 2018;282:41-5.
Wilson AS, Holland AD, Sparrow T. Laser scanning of skeletal pathological conditions. In: Thompson T, Errickson D, editors. Human remains: another dimension. London: Elsevier, 2017;123-34.
Mitchell S, Booher A. Digitization to realization: the utilization of structure from motion, ESRI ArcScene, and 3D printing to identify taphonomic processes and digitally preserve burial CC-B14. In: Houk BA, editor. The 2015 season of the Chan Chich archaeological project. Lubbock, TX: Tech University, 2015;163-74.
Mickleburgh HL, Wescott DJ. Controlled experimental observations on joint disarticulation and bone displacement of a human body in an open pit: Implications for funerary archaeology. J Archaeol Sci Rep 2018;20:158-67.
Rajshekar M, Tennant M. The role of the forensic odontologist in disaster victim identification: a brief review. Malaysian J Forensic Sci 2014;5(1):78-85.
Biggs M, Marsden P. Dental identification using 3D printed teeth following a mass fatality incident. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2019;18:1-3.
Thimmesch D. 3D printing takes the place of traditional clay modeling in forensic facial reconstruction. 3DPrint.com, 2014. https://3dprint.com/20664/3d-printing-facial-reconstruct/ (accessed November 20, 2019).
Saunders S. 3D printing and forensic reconstruction put to work in Ohio cold case. 3DPrint.com, 2016. https://3dprint.com/159137/3d-digital-images-robert-the-bruce/ (accessed November 20, 2019).
Decker S, Ford J, Davy-Jow S, Faraut P, Neville W, Hilbelink D. Who is this person? A comparison study of current three-dimensional facial approximation methods. Forensic Sci Int 2013;229(1-3):161.e1-8.
Baranowski AM, Burkhardt A, Czernik E, Hecht H. The CSI-education effect: do potential criminals benefit from forensic TV series? Int J Law Crime Justice 2018;52:86-97.
Kettner M, Schmidt P, Potente S, Ramsthaler F, Schrodt M. Reverse engineering -rapid prototyping of the skull in forensic trauma analysis. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(4):1015-7.
Fiorenza L, Yong R, Ranjitkar S, Hughes T, Quayle M, McMenamin PG, et al. Technical note: the use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections. Am J Phys Anthropol 2018;167(2):400-6.
Cohen J, Reyes SA. Creation of a 3D printed temporal bone model from clinical CT data. Am J Otolaryngol 2015;36(5):619-24.
Aalders MC, Adolphi NL, Daly B, Davis GG, de Boer HH, Decker SJ, et al. Research in forensic radiology and imaging; Identifying the most important issues. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 2017;8:1-8.
Errickson D, Thompson TJ, Rankin BW. An optimum guide for the reduction of noise using a surface scanner for digitising human osteological remains, 2015. https://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/g2gp/CS_StructuredLight (accessed March 4, 2020).
Errickson D, Fawcett H, Thompson TJU, Campbell A. The effect of different imaging techniques for the visualisation of evidence in court on jury comprehension. Int J Legal Med 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02221-y.
Additive Manufacturing Research Group. The 7 categories of additive manufacturing. Loughborough University, 2019. https://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/amrg/about/the7categoriesofadditivemanufacturing/ (accessed May 20, 2019).
Nehuen A. 3D printing technology: SLA vs SLS. Sculpteo, 2015. https://www.sculpteo.com/blog/2015/12/09/3d-printing-technologies-sls-sla/ (accessed May 20, 2019).
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: 3D imaging; 3D printing; additive manufacturing; courtroom; evidence reconstruction; forensic science; interpretation
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20200514 Date Completed: 20201027 Latest Revision: 20201027
Update Code :
20220301
DOI :
10.1111/1556-4029.14442
PMID :
32401341
Czasopismo naukowe
There has been a rapid development and utilization of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies in engineering, health care, and dentistry. Like many technologies in overlapping disciplines, these techniques have proved to be useful and hence incorporated into the forensic sciences. Therefore, this paper describes how the potential of using 3D printing is being recognized within the various sub-disciplines of forensic science and suggests areas for future applications. For instance, the application can create a permanent record of an object or scene that can be used as demonstrative evidence, preserving the integrity of the actual object or scene. Likewise, 3D printing can help with the visualization of evidential spatial relationships within a scene and increase the understanding of complex terminology within a courtroom. However, while the application of 3D printing to forensic science is beneficial, currently there is limited research demonstrated in the literature and a lack of reporting skewing the visibility of the applications. Therefore, this article highlights the need to create good practice for 3D printing across the forensic science process, the need to develop accurate and admissible 3D printed models while exploring the techniques, accuracy and bias within the courtroom, and calls for the alignment of future research and agendas perhaps in the form of a specialist working group.
(© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Forensic Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Forensic Sciences.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies