Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Intrapartum-related perinatal deaths in births planned in midwifery-led settings in Great Britain: findings and recommendations from the ESMiE confidential enquiry.

Tytuł:
Intrapartum-related perinatal deaths in births planned in midwifery-led settings in Great Britain: findings and recommendations from the ESMiE confidential enquiry.
Autorzy:
Rowe R; Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Draper ES; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kenyon S; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Bevan C; Sands, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity, London, UK.
Dickens J; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Forrester M; Royal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Scanlan R; Royal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Tuffnell D; Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Kurinczuk JJ; Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Źródło:
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology [BJOG] 2020 Dec; Vol. 127 (13), pp. 1665-1675. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 10.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: : Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Oxford [England] : Blackwell Science, [2000]-
MeSH Terms:
Perinatal Death*
Quality of Health Care*
Home Childbirth/*standards
Midwifery/*standards
Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; United Kingdom
References:
Euro-Peristat Project. European Perinatal Health Report. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2015. [www.europeristat.com]. September 2019.
Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet 2016;387:691-702.
Department of Health. Safer Maternity Care. The National Maternity Strategy - Progress and Next Steps. London: Department of Health, 2017. [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/safer-maternity-care-progress-and-next-steps].
Department of Health. On the State of Public Health: Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2006. London: Department of Health, 2007.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: 2015 Full Report. London: RCOG, 2017.
Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Kenyon S, on behalf of MBRRACE-UK, editors. MBBRACE-UK 2017 Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Intrapartum Stillbirth and Intrapartum-related Neonatal Death. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2017.
Walsh D, Spiby H, Grigg CP, Dodwell M, McCourt C, Culley L, et al. Mapping midwifery and obstetric units in England. Midwifery. 2018;56:9-16.
Department of Health/Partnerships for Children Families and Maternity. Maternity Matters: Choice, Access and Continuity of Care in a Safe Service. London: Department of Health, 2007.
Department of Health. The NHS Choice Framework: What Choices are Available to Me in the NHS? London: Department of Health, 2016 [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-choice-framework].
National Maternity Review. Better Births. Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England. A Five Year Forward View for Maternity Care. London: NHS England, 2016. [https://www.england.nhs.uk/mat-transformation/implementing-better-births/mat-review/].
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and their Babies During Childbirth. NICE Guideline CG190. London: NICE, 2014.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Providing Quality Care for Women. A Framework for Maternity Service Standards. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2016.
Redshaw M, Rowe R, Schroeder L, Puddicombe D, Macfarlane A, Newburn M, et al. Mapping Maternity Care. The Configuration of Maternity Care in England. Birthplace in England Research Programme. Final Report Part 3. London: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme, 2011.
National Audit Office. Maternity Services in England. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: The Stationery Office, 2013.
NMPA Project Team. National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Organisational Report 2017. London: RCOG, 2017.
Blotkamp A, NMPA Project Team. National Maternity and Perinatal Audit: Organisational Report 2019. London: RCOG, 2019.
Scarf VL, Rossiter C, Vedam S, Dahlen HG, Ellwood D, Forster D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery 2018;62:240-55.
Hutton EK, Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, Kaufman K. Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine 2019;14:59-70.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 12. 2018.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2017.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;343:d7400.
Hinton L, Dumelow C, Rowe R, Hollowell J. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:12.
Henshall C, Taylor B, Kenyon S. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:53.
Henshall C, Taylor B, Goodwin L, Farre A, Jones ME, Kenyon S. Improving the quality and content of midwives’ discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Midwifery 2018;59:118-26.
Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: a systematic review. Health Risk Soc 2012;14:511-31.
Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. A metasynthesis of risk perception in women with high risk pregnancies. Midwifery 2014;30:403-11.
Lee S, Holden D, Webb R, Ayers S. Pregnancy related risk perception in pregnant women, midwives & doctors: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:335.
Bisits A. Risk in obstetrics - perspectives and reflections. Midwifery 2016;38:12-3.
Van Wagner V. Risk talk: using evidence without increasing fear. Midwifery 2016;38:21-8.
Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. How women with high risk pregnancies perceive interactions with healthcare professionals when discussing place of birth: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2016;38:42-8.
Hollander M, de Miranda E, van Dillen J, de Graaf I, Vandenbussche F, Holten L. Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:423.
Holten L, de Miranda E. Women's motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: an exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery 2016;38:55-62.
Feeley C, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:59.
van der Garde M, Hollander M, Olthuis G, Vandenbussche F, van Dillen J. Women desiring less care than recommended during childbirth: three years of dedicated clinic. Birth 2019;46:262-9.
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
Altaf S, Oppenheimer C, Shaw R, Waugh J, Dixon-Woods M. Practices and views on fetal heart monitoring: a structured observation and interview study. BJOG 2006;113:409-18.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intelligent auscultation - 'listen' for fetal wellbeing. Shared learning database. Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, 2014 [https://www.nice.org.uk/sharedlearning/intelligent-auscultation-listen-for-fetal-wellbeing]. September 2019.
Rowe RE, Kurinczuk JJ, Locock L, Fitzpatrick R. Women's experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012;12:129.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Improving Patient Handover. Good Practice Guideline No. 12. London: RCOG, 2010.
Royal College of Paedatrics and Child Health. Situation Awareness for Everyone (S.A.F.E) Toolkit. London: Royal College of Paedatrics and Child Health, 2019 [https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/situation-awareness-everyone-safe-toolkit-introduction]. Accessed 15 April 2020.
MAMA Academy. London ambulance call cards. 2019. [https://www.mamaacademy.org.uk/about-us/london-ambulance-call-cards/]. Accessed September 2019.
Wyllie J, Ainsworth S, Tinnion R. Resuscitation and SUPPORT of Transition of Babies at Birth. London: Resuscitation Council (UK), 2015. [https://www.resus.org.uk/resuscitation-guidelines/resuscitation-and-support-of-transition-of-babies-at-birth/].
British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Neonatal Support for Stand Alone Midwifery Led Units (MLUs). A Framework for Practice. London: British Association of Perinatal Medicine, 2011. [https://www.bapm.org/resources/29-neonatal-support-for-stand-alone-midwifery-led-units-mlus-a-framework-for-practice-2011].
Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: The Stationery Office, 2015. [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/morecambe-bay-investigation-report].
Sands. Reviewing Every Baby Death. London: Sands, 2019. [https://www.snds.org.uk/professionals/fewer-baby-deaths/reviewing-every-baby-death]. Accessed September 2019.
MBRRACE-UK. Perinatal Mortality Review Tool. Oxford: MBRRACE-UK, 2019. [https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/pmrt]. Accessed September 2019.
Health Research Authority. What Approvals and Decisions Do I Need? London: Health Research Authority, 2019. [https://www.hra.nhs.uk/approvals-amendments/what-approvals-do-i-need/]. Accessed November 2019.
Grant Information:
International National Institute for Health Research
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Birth centres; home birth; midwifery; perinatal death; quality of health care; stillbirth
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200522 Date Completed: 20201207 Latest Revision: 20210819
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1111/1471-0528.16327
PMID:
32437088
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: To review quality of care in births planned in midwifery-led settings, resulting in an intrapartum-related perinatal death.
Design: Confidential enquiry.
Setting: England, Scotland and Wales.
Sample: Intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in births planned in alongside midwifery units, freestanding midwifery units or at home, sampled from national perinatal surveillance data for 2015/16 (alongside midwifery units) and 2013-16 (freestanding midwifery units and home births).
Methods: Multidisciplinary panels reviewed medical notes for each death, assessing and grading quality of care by consensus, with reference to national standards and guidance. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.
Results: Sixty-four deaths were reviewed, 30 stillbirths and 34 neonatal deaths. At the start of labour care, 23 women were planning birth in an alongside midwifery unit, 26 in a freestanding midwifery unit and 15 at home. In 75% of deaths, improvements in care were identified that may have made a difference to the outcome for the baby. Improvements in care were identified that may have made a difference to the mother's physical and psychological health and wellbeing in 75% of deaths. Issues with care were identified around risk assessment and decisions about planning place of birth, intermittent auscultation, transfer during labour, resuscitation and neonatal transfer, follow up and local review.
Conclusions: These confidential enquiry findings do not address the overall safety of midwifery-led settings for healthy women with straightforward pregnancies, but suggest areas where the safety of care can be improved. Maternity services should review their care with respect to our recommendations.
Tweetable Abstract: Confidential enquiry of intrapartum-related baby deaths highlights areas where care in midwifery-led settings can be made even safer.
(© 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)
Comment in: BJOG. 2020 Dec;127(13):1676. (PMID: 32524741)
Comment in: BJOG. 2021 Sep;128(10):1713-1714. (PMID: 34132455)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies