Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Airborne Aerosol Generation During Endonasal Procedures in the Era of COVID-19: Risks and Recommendations.

Tytuł:
Airborne Aerosol Generation During Endonasal Procedures in the Era of COVID-19: Risks and Recommendations.
Autorzy:
Workman AD; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jafari A; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Welling DB; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Varvares MA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gray ST; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Holbrook EH; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Scangas GA; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xiao R; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Carter BS; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Curry WT; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bleier BS; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Źródło:
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg] 2020 Sep; Vol. 163 (3), pp. 465-470. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 26.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2023- : [Oxford] : Wiley
Original Publication: [Rochester, Minn.] : The Academy, [c1981-
MeSH Terms:
Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures*
Aerosols/*adverse effects
Coronavirus Infections/*transmission
Nose/*virology
Pneumonia, Viral/*transmission
Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Cadaver ; Endoscopy ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Particle Size ; Personal Protective Equipment ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; SARS-CoV-2
References:
Am J Infect Control. 2008 May;36(4):276-82. (PMID: 18455048)
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 15;65(8):1335-1341. (PMID: 29017249)
JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1441-1442. (PMID: 32167525)
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):676-680. (PMID: 32371934)
Allergy. 2020 Jul;75(7):1699-1709. (PMID: 32196678)
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2009 Sep;22(3):229-37. (PMID: 19415984)
J R Soc Interface. 2012 May 7;9(70):938-48. (PMID: 21937487)
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797. (PMID: 22563403)
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):546-52. (PMID: 25573680)
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Dec 03;3:31. (PMID: 19055750)
CMAJ. 2016 May 17;188(8):567-574. (PMID: 26952529)
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Jul;10(7):798-805. (PMID: 32243678)
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1980 Jun;41(6):385-98a. (PMID: 7395752)
Am J Infect Control. 1998 Aug;26(4):453-64. (PMID: 9721404)
Rhinology. 2015 Mar;53(1):10-7. (PMID: 25756072)
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. (PMID: 31978945)
Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Apr;52(3):177-85. (PMID: 18326870)
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Oct;64(2):100-14. (PMID: 16916564)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: COVID-19; aerosol-generating procedure; aerosol-generating surgery; aerosolization; airborne; endoscopy; nasal endoscopy
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Aerosols)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200527 Date Completed: 20200910 Latest Revision: 20210110
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7251624
DOI:
10.1177/0194599820931805
PMID:
32452739
Czasopismo naukowe
Objective: In the era of SARS-CoV-2, the risk of infectious airborne aerosol generation during otolaryngologic procedures has been an area of increasing concern. The objective of this investigation was to quantify airborne aerosol production under clinical and surgical conditions and examine efficacy of mask mitigation strategies.
Study Design: Prospective quantification of airborne aerosol generation during surgical and clinical simulation.
Setting: Cadaver laboratory and clinical examination room.
Subjects and Methods: Airborne aerosol quantification with an optical particle sizer was performed in real time during cadaveric simulated endoscopic surgical conditions, including hand instrumentation, microdebrider use, high-speed drilling, and cautery. Aerosol sampling was additionally performed in simulated clinical and diagnostic settings. All clinical and surgical procedures were evaluated for propensity for significant airborne aerosol generation.
Results: Hand instrumentation and microdebridement did not produce detectable airborne aerosols in the range of 1 to 10 μm. Suction drilling at 12,000 rpm, high-speed drilling (4-mm diamond or cutting burs) at 70,000 rpm, and transnasal cautery generated significant airborne aerosols ( P < .001). In clinical simulations, nasal endoscopy ( P < .05), speech ( P < .01), and sneezing ( P < .01) generated 1- to 10-μm airborne aerosols. Significant aerosol escape was seen even with utilization of a standard surgical mask ( P < .05). Intact and VENT-modified (valved endoscopy of the nose and throat) N95 respirator use prevented significant airborne aerosol spread.
Conclusion: Transnasal drill and cautery use is associated with significant airborne particulate matter production in the range of 1 to 10 μm under surgical conditions. During simulated clinical activity, airborne aerosol generation was seen during nasal endoscopy, speech, and sneezing. Intact or VENT-modified N95 respirators mitigated airborne aerosol transmission, while standard surgical masks did not.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies