-
Tytuł:
-
Creating a network of importance: The particular effects of self-relevance on stimulus processing.
-
Autorzy:
-
Schäfer S; Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, D-54286, Trier, Germany. .
Wentura D; General Psychology and Statistics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Frings C; Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, D-54286, Trier, Germany.
-
Źródło:
-
Attention, perception & psychophysics [Atten Percept Psychophys] 2020 Oct; Vol. 82 (7), pp. 3750-3766.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Journal Article
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: 2011- : New York : Springer
Original Publication: Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Attention*
Visual Perception*
Humans
-
References:
-
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(3):151-6. (PMID: 18549161)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):776-86. (PMID: 24417329)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1105-17. (PMID: 22963229)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):46-52. (PMID: 16556557)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44. (PMID: 1431742)
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2013;26(1):1-19. (PMID: 22136158)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 11;7:262. (PMID: 23781185)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):380-91. (PMID: 1941510)
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. (PMID: 17695343)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):451-8. (PMID: 26160427)
Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44. (PMID: 7972591)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;78(6):1024-37. (PMID: 10870906)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):42-9. (PMID: 19691003)
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2325-36. (PMID: 24728130)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):322-7. (PMID: 16893002)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):956-60. (PMID: 18926988)
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):474-88. (PMID: 15285130)
Cogn Emot. 2016 Sep;30(6):1137-48. (PMID: 26197360)
Psychol Bull. 1985 Mar;97(2):316-33. (PMID: 3983301)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):382-92. (PMID: 14979812)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):441-52. (PMID: 25602970)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):466-78. (PMID: 11561921)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(4):752-63. (PMID: 25980956)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500. (PMID: 15491903)
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):988-96. (PMID: 22309728)
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(6):415-25. (PMID: 27120563)
Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24. (PMID: 8711015)
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):312-8. (PMID: 17543540)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Mar;43(3):438-443. (PMID: 28240929)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):719-728. (PMID: 26447060)
Exp Psychol. 2018 Nov;65(6):323-331. (PMID: 30638165)
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):25-32. (PMID: 15660848)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(10):1952-64. (PMID: 25851057)
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):5-17. (PMID: 25945926)
Psychol Bull. 2016 Jan;142(1):79-106. (PMID: 26390266)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;20(7):482-483. (PMID: 27315761)
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Apr;49(2):247-273. (PMID: 32030581)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):681-700. (PMID: 11757875)
Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):62-72. (PMID: 16637750)
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;38(2):184-99. (PMID: 17112461)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2549-61. (PMID: 26265319)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):701-7. (PMID: 24488806)
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(7):1223-37. (PMID: 22416914)
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Feb;31(1):137-49. (PMID: 10495845)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 May;72(5):1068-1083. (PMID: 29747554)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1524-1534. (PMID: 28321797)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1582-1588. (PMID: 26786088)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1100-17. (PMID: 25528086)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):1176-84. (PMID: 24519433)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387. (PMID: 32298623)
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(3):203-11. (PMID: 18549168)
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522. (PMID: 11488376)
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):557-65. (PMID: 18433742)
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):362-70. (PMID: 18399889)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Apr;59(4):683-93. (PMID: 16707357)
-
Contributed Indexing:
-
Keywords: Attention: Selective; Perceptual categorization and identification; Visual perception
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20200620 Date Completed: 20201221 Latest Revision: 20210110
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC7536139
-
DOI:
-
10.3758/s13414-020-02070-7
-
PMID:
-
32557005
-
Several factors guide our attention and the way we process our surroundings. In that regard, there is an ongoing debate about the way we are influenced by stimuli that have a particular self-relevance for us. Recent findings suggest that self-relevance does not always capture our attention automatically. Instead, an interpretation of the literature might be that self-relevance serves as an associative advantage facilitating the integration of relevant stimuli into the self-concept. We compared the effect of self-relevant stimuli with the effect of negative stimuli in three tasks measuring different aspects of cognitive processing. We found a first dissociation suggesting that negative valence attracts attention while self-relevance does not, a second dissociation suggesting that self-relevance influences stimulus processing beyond attention-grabbing mechanisms and in the form of an "associative glue," while negative valence does not, and, last but not least, a third dissociation suggesting that self-relevance influences stimulus processing at a later stage than negative valence does.