Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Trends in Glaucoma Surgeries Performed by Glaucoma Subspecialists versus Nonsubspecialists on Medicare Beneficiaries from 2008 through 2016.

Tytuł:
Trends in Glaucoma Surgeries Performed by Glaucoma Subspecialists versus Nonsubspecialists on Medicare Beneficiaries from 2008 through 2016.
Autorzy:
Rathi S; Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Andrews CA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Greenfield DS; Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Stein JD; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: .
Źródło:
Ophthalmology [Ophthalmology] 2021 Jan; Vol. 128 (1), pp. 30-38. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 26.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Observational Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2000- : New York : Elsevier
Original Publication: Rochester, Minn., American Academy of Ophthalmology.
MeSH Terms:
Filtering Surgery/*trends
Glaucoma/*surgery
Medicare Part B/*statistics & numerical data
Ophthalmologists/*statistics & numerical data
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; United States
References:
J Glaucoma. 2004 Jun;13(3):233-7. (PMID: 15118469)
J Glaucoma. 2007 Sep;16(6):527-30. (PMID: 17873713)
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;43(1):40-6. (PMID: 24811050)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Mar;119(3):345-50. (PMID: 11231767)
Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):332-339. (PMID: 28625684)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;121(6):777-83. (PMID: 12796247)
Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2265-70. (PMID: 17466376)
J Glaucoma. 2012 Sep;21(7):460-8. (PMID: 21543992)
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;38(3):266-72. (PMID: 20447122)
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;41(6):546-51. (PMID: 23231754)
Surv Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):36-50. (PMID: 25113610)
J Glaucoma. 2015 Aug;24(6):e157-62. (PMID: 25646714)
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:219-225. (PMID: 31377287)
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1795-801. (PMID: 25881513)
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;155(4):688-96, 696.e1-2. (PMID: 23219066)
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):532-8. (PMID: 15078671)
BMJ Open. 2012 May 30;2(3):. (PMID: 22649172)
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 19;15:107. (PMID: 26286384)
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1737-9. (PMID: 26299720)
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;38(8):1339-45. (PMID: 22814041)
Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1615-24. (PMID: 26092196)
Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1315-9, 1319.e1. (PMID: 18321581)
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789-803.e2. (PMID: 22245458)
J Glaucoma. 2006 Dec;15(6):486-93. (PMID: 17106360)
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. (PMID: 24974815)
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:3182935. (PMID: 28512578)
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;94(9):1180-3. (PMID: 20576775)
Grant Information:
P30 EY014801 United States EY NEI NIH HHS; R01 EY026641 United States EY NEI NIH HHS
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200630 Date Completed: 20210412 Latest Revision: 20220102
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7755669
DOI:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.051
PMID:
32598949
Czasopismo naukowe
Purpose: To characterize the use of laser and incisional glaucoma surgeries among Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 through 2016 and to compare the use of these surgeries by glaucoma subspecialists versus nonsubspecialists.
Design: Retrospective, observational analysis.
Participants: Medicare beneficiaries (n = 1 468 035) undergoing ≥1 laser or incisional glaucoma surgery procedure during 2008 through 2016.
Methods: Claims data from a 20% sample of enrollees in fee-for-service Medicare throughout the United States were analyzed to identify all laser and incisional glaucoma surgeries performed from 2008 through 2016. We assessed use of traditional incisional glaucoma surgery techniques (trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage implant [GDI] procedure) and microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Enrollee and procedure counts were multiplied by 5 to estimate use throughout all of Medicare. Linear regression was used to compare trends in use of glaucoma surgeries between ophthalmologists who could be characterized as glaucoma subspecialists versus nonsubspecialists.
Main Outcome Measures: Numbers of laser and incisional glaucoma surgeries performed overall and stratified by glaucoma subspecialist status.
Results: The number of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing any glaucoma therapeutic procedure increased by 10.6%, from 218 375 in 2008 to 241 565 in 2016. The total number of traditional incisional glaucoma surgeries decreased by 11.7%, from 37 225 to 32 885 (P = 0.02). The total number of MIGS procedures increased by 426% from 13 705 in 2012 (the first year MIGS codes were available) to 58 345 in 2016 (P = 0.001). Throughout the study period, glaucoma subspecialists performed most of the trabeculectomies (76.7% in 2008, 83.1% in 2016) and GDI procedures (77.7% in 2008, 80.6% in 2016). Many MIGS procedures were performed by nonsubspecialists. The proportions of endocyclophotocoagulations, iStent (Glaukos; San Clemente, CA) insertions, goniotomies, and canaloplasties performed by glaucoma subspecialists in 2016 were 22.0%, 25.2%, 56.9%, and 62.8%, respectively.
Conclusions: From 2008 through 2016, a large shift in practice from traditional incisional glaucoma surgeries to MIGS procedures was observed. Although glaucoma subspecialists continue to perform most traditional incisional glaucoma surgeries, many MIGS procedures are performed by nonsubspecialists. These results highlight the importance of training residents in performing MIGS procedures and managing these patients perioperatively. Future studies should explore the impact of this shift in care on outcomes and costs.
(Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies