Performance Differences Between the Arched and Flat Bench Press in Beginner and Experienced Paralympic Powerlifters.

Szczegóły
Abstrakt

Tytuł:: Performance Differences Between the Arched and Flat Bench Press in Beginner and Experienced Paralympic Powerlifters.
Autorzy:: Ribeiro Neto F; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
Dorneles JR; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
Luna RM; Brazilian Olympic Commitee, São Paulo, Brazil ; and.
Spina MA; Brazilian Olympic Commitee, São Paulo, Brazil ; and.; São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gonçalves CW; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
Gomes Costa RR; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
Źródło:: Journal of strength and conditioning research [J Strength Cond Res] 2022 Jul 01; Vol. 36 (7), pp. 1936-1943. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 27.
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Original Publication: Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics Pub., c1993-
MeSH Terms:: Resistance Training*/methods
Weight Lifting*
Adult ; Exercise Therapy ; Humans ; Movement ; Muscle Strength
References:: Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Marchante D, Baz-Valle E, et al. Analysis of wearable and smartphone-based technologies for the measurement of barbell velocity in different resistance training exercises. Front Physiol 8: 649, 2017.
Balsalobre-Fernandez C, Marchante D, Munoz-Lopez M, Jimenez SL. Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone app for the measurement of barbell velocity and 1RM on the bench-press exercise. J Sports Sci 36: 64–70, 2018.
Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1: 50–57, 2006.
Bernards JR, Sato K, Haff GG, Bazyler CD. Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports 5: 87, 2017.
Brown LE, Weir JP. ASEP procedures recommendation I: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. J Exerc Physiol 4, 2001.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988. pp. 1–21.
de Oliveira Borgesđ MV, de Sousa EC, Rego JT, et al. Electromyographic analysis of bench press in paralympic athletes. Med Sport 10: 2452–2456, 2014.
Dwyer GB, Davis SE, Pire NI, Thompson WR. ACSM's Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment Manual . Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
García-Ramos A, Pérez-Castilla A, Villar Macias FJ, Latorre-Román PÁ, Párraga JA, et al. Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters. Sports Biomech 10: 1–13, 2018.
Garhammer I. A review of power output studies of Olympic and powerlifting: Methodology, performance. J Strength Cond Res 7: 76–89, 1993.
Gomes Costa RR, Ribeiro Neto F. Cross-validity of one maximum repetition predictive equation for men with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 26: 1–6, 2018.
Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B. Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Ass 82: 1147–1149, 1987.
Hopkins WG. How to interpret changes in an athletic performance test. Sportsci 8: 1–7, 2004.
Kannan KS, Manoj K, Arumugam S. Labeling methods for identifying outliers. Int J Stat Sys 10: 231–238, 2015.
Kristiansen M, Madeleine P, Hansen EA, Samani A. Inter-subject variability of muscle synergies during bench press in power lifters and untrained individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25: 89–97, 2015.
O'Neill SB, Maguire S. Patient perception of the impact of sporting activity on rehabilitation in a spinal cord injuries unit. Spinal Cord 42: 627, 2004.
Puig-Diví A, Padullés-Riu JM, Busquets-Faciaben A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Kinovea program in obtaining angular and distance dimensions. PLoS One 6: 1–14, 2017.
Ribeiro Neto F, Guanais P, Dornelas E, Coutinho ACB, Costa RRG. Validity of one-repetition maximum predictive equations in men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 55: 950–956, 2017.
Ribeiro Neto F, Gomes Costa RR, Carregaro RL. The addition of three new items in the Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit improves the discrimination between different levels of spinal cord injury. Phys Theor Pract 55: 1–11, 2019.
Sañudo B, Rueda D, Pozo-Cruz B, de Hoyo M, Carrasco L. Validation of a video analysis software package for quantifying movement velocity in resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 30: 2934–2941, 2016.
Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS. Health-related physical fitness testing and interpretation. In: ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription . Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009.pp. 96–98.
van der Woude LH, de Groot S, Janssen TW. Manual wheelchairs: Research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health. Med Eng Phys 28: 905–915, 2006.
Webborn N, Van de Vliet P. Paralympic medicine. Lancet 380: 65–71, 2012.
Willick SE, Webborn N, Emery C, et al. The epidemiology of injuries at the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Br J Sports Med 47: 426–432, 2013.
World Para Powerlifting. Available at: https://www.paralympic.org/powerlifting . Accessed 2019.
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20200803 Date Completed: 20220623 Latest Revision: 20220626
Update Code:: 20240105
DOI:: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003736
PMID:: 32740285
: Czasopismo naukowe

Abstract: Neto, FR, Dorneles, JR, Luna, RM, Spina, MA, Gonçalves, CW, and Gomes Costa, RR. Performance differences between the arched and flat bench press in beginner and experienced Paralympic powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 36(7): 1936-1943, 2022-The present study aimed to verify the differences of the total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell between the arched and flat techniques of the bench press in beginner (BG) and experienced (EG) Paralympic powerlifters. Twenty beginners (age: 34.4 years; experience: 3.3 months) and 23 experienced (age: 35.5 years; experience: 9.8 months) Paralympic powerlifters were selected from a Rehabilitation Hospital Network and a Paralympic sports center. Subjects were assessed in the one-maximum repetition test of the bench press exercise using the flat and arched bench press techniques (48-72-hour interval between sessions). Maximum strength, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were measured to compare the techniques and the groups. The total load corrected with the Haleczko formula was significantly higher in EG compared with BG (∆ = 21.1%; effect sizes [ES] = 0.39, p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences for all analyzed outcomes comparing the arched and flat techniques. During the eccentric phase of the bench press, all assessed differences ranged from -16.6 to 23.1% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. On the concentric phase, the assessed differences ranged from -20.7 to 13.9% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. The total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were not significantly different between the arched and flat techniques for experienced and beginner powerlifting athletes during both the eccentric and concentric phase of the movement. However, further analyses are essential to determine the best technique for athletes.
(Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)

Informacja