Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Comparison of alternative full and brief versions of functional status scales among older adults in China.

Tytuł:
Comparison of alternative full and brief versions of functional status scales among older adults in China.
Autorzy:
Reich J; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Thompson MG; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Cowling BJ; WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Iuliano AD; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Greene C; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Chen Y; WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Phadnis R; Abt Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Leung NHL; WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Song Y; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Fang VJ; WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Xu C; Chinese National Influenza Center, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Collaboration Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Dai Q; Department of Acute Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Zhang J; Suzhou Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Suzhou, China.
Zhang H; Yancheng Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Yancheng, China.
Havers F; Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Corporate Authors:
CARES investigators
Źródło:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Aug 11; Vol. 15 (8), pp. e0234698. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 11 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
Activities of Daily Living*
Disability Evaluation*
Physical Functional Performance*
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; China ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment/methods ; Hong Kong ; Humans ; Independent Living ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies
References:
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 12;:. (PMID: 31828291)
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0146247. (PMID: 26716861)
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(11):1601-10. (PMID: 8961404)
Aging (Milano). 1993 Oct;5(5):371-83. (PMID: 8123698)
Vaccine. 2009 Mar 4;27(10):1628-36. (PMID: 19100304)
Gerontologist. 1996 Oct;36(5):571-83. (PMID: 8942101)
J Appl Meas. 2002;3(2):205-31. (PMID: 12011501)
Vaccine. 2011 Jul 12;29(31):5015-21. (PMID: 21565245)
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. (PMID: 13245896)
Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):64-7. (PMID: 3042746)
BMC Geriatr. 2008 Sep 30;8:24. (PMID: 18826625)
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. (PMID: 14258950)
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 May 1;16(5):412-9. (PMID: 25732832)
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Jun;69(6):766-72. (PMID: 24149431)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jun;64(6):1281-6. (PMID: 27321607)
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):314. (PMID: 30547760)
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Apr;47(4):319-29. (PMID: 8322873)
J Health Psychol. 2014 Sep;19(9):1185-96. (PMID: 23682064)
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. (PMID: 5349366)
BMC Med. 2015 Jul 13;13:161. (PMID: 26166298)
BMC Geriatr. 2013 Aug 22;13:86. (PMID: 23968433)
J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;22(10):1834-43. (PMID: 8991979)
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;15(11):1021-7. (PMID: 11113982)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1691-9. (PMID: 11844005)
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Oct;59(10):1056-61. (PMID: 15528778)
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. (PMID: 5420677)
Gerontologist. 1990 Aug;30(4):497-502. (PMID: 2394384)
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 1;7(10):e017503. (PMID: 29092901)
Scand J Soc Med. 1993 Dec;21(4):233-46. (PMID: 8310276)
Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9 Suppl 1:87-94; discussion 143-50. (PMID: 9447431)
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Apr 20;11:17. (PMID: 21507234)
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Feb 1;14(2):361-367. (PMID: 29172948)
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Sep 18;6(5-8):54. (PMID: 25356088)
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1207. (PMID: 30718784)
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Oct;21(19-20):2736-46. (PMID: 21883577)
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;73(12):1695-1700. (PMID: 29244089)
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):711-2. (PMID: 26123255)
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Aug 16;11:42. (PMID: 21846335)
Exp Gerontol. 2018 May;105:4-9. (PMID: 29111233)
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112294. (PMID: 25392931)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1537-51. (PMID: 24028357)
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;50(2):177-82. (PMID: 3572432)
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016 Mar;28(3):160-9. (PMID: 25964008)
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012 May;65(2):237-50. (PMID: 21651508)
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1270-3. (PMID: 8059884)
Grant Information:
U01 IP001064 United States IP NCIRD CDC HHS
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200812 Date Completed: 20201001 Latest Revision: 20220725
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7418957
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0234698
PMID:
32780744
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Brief assessments of functional status for community-dwelling older adults are needed given expanded interest in the measurement of functional decline.
Methods: As part of a 2015 prospective cohort study of older adults aged 60-89 years in Jiangsu Province, China, 1506 participants were randomly assigned to two groups; each group was administered one of two alternative 20-item versions of a scale to assess activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) drawn from multiple commonly-used scales. One version asked if they required help to perform activities (ADL-IADL-HELP-20), while the other version provided additional response options if activities could be done alone but with difficulty (ADL-IADL-DIFFICULTY-20). Item responses to both versions were compared using the binomial test for differences in proportion (with Wald 95% confidence interval [CI]). A brief 9-item scale (ADL-IADL-DIFFICULTY-9) was developed favoring items identified as difficult or requiring help by ≥4%, with low redundancy and/or residual correlations, and with significant correlations with age and other health indicators. We repeated assessment of the measurement properties of the brief scale in two subsequent samples of older adults in Hong Kong in 2016 (aged 70-79 years; n = 404) and 2017 (aged 65-82 years; n = 1854).
Results: Asking if an activity can be done alone but with difficulty increased the proportion of participants reporting restriction on 9 of 20 items, for which 95% CI for difference scores did not overlap with zero; the proportion with at least one limitation increased from 28.6% to 34.2% or an absolute increase of 5.6% (95% CI = 0.9-10.3%), which was a relative increase of 19.6%. The brief ADL-IADL-DIFFICULTY-9 maintained excellent internal consistency (α = 0.93) and had similar ceiling effect (68.1%), invariant item ordering (H trans = .41; medium), and correlations with age and other health measures compared with the 20-item version. The brief scale performed similarly when subsequently administered to older adults in Hong Kong.
Conclusions: Asking if tasks can be done alone but with difficulty can modestly reduce ceiling effects. It's possible that the length of commonly-used scales can be reduced by over half if researchers are primarily interested in a summed indicator rather than an inventory of specific types of deficits.
Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: BJC has received research funding unrelated to this study from Sanofi Pasteur (https://www.sanofi.com/en/your-health/vaccines). RP is a paid employee of Abt Associates (https://www.abtassociates.com/). There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies