Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

Does the quality of the presentation influence the outcome of a submitted manuscript? A plea for including "How to submit" in medical education.

Tytuł :
Does the quality of the presentation influence the outcome of a submitted manuscript? A plea for including "How to submit" in medical education.
Autorzy :
Crampon F; Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine-Pharmacy, Rouen-Normandie University, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, 76183, Rouen, France.
Prum G; Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine-Pharmacy, Rouen-Normandie University, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, 76183, Rouen, France.
Trost O; Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine-Pharmacy, Rouen-Normandie University, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, 76183, Rouen, France.
Grignon B; Department of Anatomy, University of Lorraine, Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54505, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Duparc F; Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine-Pharmacy, Rouen-Normandie University, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, 76183, Rouen, France. .
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA [Surg Radiol Anat] 2021 Apr; Vol. 43 (4), pp. 579-583. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 26.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: Berlin ; New York : Springer International, c1986-
References :
Bannas P, Reeder Scott B (2017) How to write an original radiological research manuscript. Eur Radiol 27:4455–4460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00330-017-4879-8286167266599681)
Chipperfield L, Citrome L, Clark J, David FS, Enck R, Evangelista M, Gonzalez J, Groves T, Magrann J, Mansi B, Miller C, Mooney LA, Murphy A, Shelton J, Walson PD, Al W (2010) Authors' Submission Toolkit: A practical guide to getting your research published. Curr Med Res Opin 26:1967–1982. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2010.499344. (PMID: 10.1185/03007995.2010.49934420569069)
Guilford WH (2001) Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv Physiol Edu 25(3):167–175. (PMID: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167)
Heinemann MK (2016) How not to write a medical paper. A practical guide. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Limited, Utta Pradesh. (PMID: 10.1055/b-005-148870)
Hyatt JP, Bienenstock EJ, Tilan JU (2017) A student guide to proofreading and writing in science. Adv Physiol Educ 41:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00004.2017. (PMID: 10.1152/advan.00004.201728679566)
Oyibo SO (2019) Developing a beginner’s guide to writing a clinical case report: a pilot evaluation by junior doctors. Cureus 11:e6370. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6370. (PMID: 10.7759/cureus.6370318860956910615)
Rylski B (2015) How to write a perfect scientific manuscript. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 48:179. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv217. (PMID: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv21726069240)
Tomaszewski KA, Henry BM, Ramakrishnan PK, Roy J, Vikse J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, Walocha JA (2017) Development of the Anatomical Quality Assurance (AQUA) Checklist: guidelines for reporting original anatomical studies. Clin Anat 30:14–20. (PMID: 10.1002/ca.22800)
Wynnea KE, Simpson BJ, Berman L, Rangel SJ, Grosfeld JL, Moss RL (2011) Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal. J Pediatric Surg 46:131–137. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.09.077)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: Guidelines for submitting; Instructions for authors; Medical education; Scientific publication
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20200827 Latest Revision: 20210406
Update Code :
20210406
DOI :
10.1007/s00276-020-02561-0
PMID :
32845395
Czasopismo naukowe
Introduction: Our goal was to study the influence of the author's compliance with the Instructions for Authors for a submitted manuscript to a journal, on the final outcome of the submission.
Material and Methods: 1200 consecutive submissions to the journal Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy have been evaluated and divided into four groups: A: Accepted, R: Rejected, I + : Instructions for Authors followed, I - : Instructions for Authors not followed. The quantity of manuscripts in the groups was measured and compared through statistical tests. We tried to determine if a specific category of authors was more likely to incorrectly follow the Instructions for Authors by verifying the lists of authors and the tables of contributions of co-authors. 322 (26.83%) manuscripts were accepted, 248 were I + , 74 were I - ; 878 (73.16%) were rejected, 526 were I + ; 352 were I - .
Results: The comparisons of the observed values and percentages showed significant differences between the groups. We could not identify a specific type of author associated with non-compliance with the Instructions for Authors.
Conclusion: Most of the guidelines that have been published concern the preparation of the scientific contents of the manuscript (How to write), but the submission process (How to submit) has rarely been explained. We suggest including the rules of submitting a manuscript in graduate and post-graduate medical education.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies