Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Tytuł pozycji:

"The hardest job you will ever love": Nurse recruitment, retention, and turnover in the Nurse-Family Partnership program in British Columbia, Canada.

Tytuł :
"The hardest job you will ever love": Nurse recruitment, retention, and turnover in the Nurse-Family Partnership program in British Columbia, Canada.
Autorzy :
Campbell KA; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Van Borek N; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marcellus L; School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Landy CK; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jack SM; School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pokaż więcej
Corporate Authors :
British Columbia Healthy Connections Project Process Evaluation Research Team
Źródło :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 08; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0237028. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 08 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język :
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms :
Job Satisfaction*
Personnel Selection*
Personnel Turnover*
British Columbia ; Female ; Humans ; Mothers ; Parenting ; Pregnancy ; Societies, Nursing
References :
Prev Sci. 2013 Dec;14(6):525-34. (PMID: 23832657)
Qual Health Res. 2011 Apr;21(4):443-53. (PMID: 21164035)
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Jul;22(5):653-63. (PMID: 25041804)
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Nov;22(8):1027-41. (PMID: 23758834)
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jan;19(1-2):156-67. (PMID: 20500254)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):85-92. (PMID: 23809644)
J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jun;38(6):287-96. (PMID: 18562833)
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;48(3-4):355-91. (PMID: 17355402)
Prof Inferm. 2019 Jan-Mar;72(1):60-68. (PMID: 31162045)
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):61-70. (PMID: 24354411)
BMC Nurs. 2015 Mar 08;14:12. (PMID: 25767414)
J Nurs Manag. 2011 May;19(4):461-77. (PMID: 21569143)
J Nurs Adm. 2006 Mar;36(3):148-54. (PMID: 16601518)
Public Health Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;23(3):250-5. (PMID: 16684203)
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 7;19(1):136. (PMID: 30086722)
Public Health Rep. 2017 Sep/Oct;132(5):556-562. (PMID: 28792856)
Prev Sci. 2012 Jun;13(3):219-28. (PMID: 22562646)
Nurs Econ. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):217-21. (PMID: 17847657)
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1782-8. (PMID: 27552269)
JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1238-44. (PMID: 9786373)
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):530-545. (PMID: 28125259)
Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Jan;27(1):41-54. (PMID: 28640422)
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):859-81. (PMID: 25616718)
BMC Nurs. 2019 May 2;18:17. (PMID: 31073277)
Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Jan;27(1):5-25. (PMID: 28640426)
Can J Public Health. 2009 Sep-Oct;100(5):I1-11. (PMID: 19994738)
Can J Public Health. 2012 Feb 01;103(7 Suppl 1):eS42-8. (PMID: 23618049)
Nurs Econ. 2017 Mar-Apr;35(2):64-9, 87. (PMID: 29985570)
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):51-62. (PMID: 22528195)
J Community Health Nurs. 2005 Winter;22(4):181-94. (PMID: 16245970)
Am J Nurs. 2007 Nov;107(11):69-72. (PMID: 18075347)
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Feb;22(1):91-102. (PMID: 24917268)
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Jan;20(1):12-8. (PMID: 25559024)
BMJ. 2002 Mar 2;324(7336):499-500. (PMID: 11872536)
Collegian. 2015;22(4):353-8. (PMID: 26775521)
Can J Public Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;95(1):54-8. (PMID: 14768743)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 04;16(a):349. (PMID: 27488474)
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Aug;31(4):391-8. (PMID: 18203128)
Public Health Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;29(5):424-32. (PMID: 22924565)
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Jul;24(5):589-97. (PMID: 26833991)
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):334-340. (PMID: 29336862)
J Nurs Adm. 2007 Oct;37(10):471-6. (PMID: 17914295)
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Sep 11;11:44. (PMID: 24025429)
Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Jul-Sep;40(3):237-53. (PMID: 24901298)
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jan/Mar;42(1):87-97. (PMID: 26545207)
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2014 Aug-Nov;15(3-4):64-71. (PMID: 25156041)
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Nov;18(8):1073-86. (PMID: 21073578)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):887-905. (PMID: 22019402)
Nurs Econ. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):6-11, 3; quiz 12. (PMID: 17402672)
BMC Nurs. 2015 Sep 17;14:47. (PMID: 26388698)
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20200908 Date Completed: 20201028 Latest Revision: 20201028
Update Code :
PubMed Central ID :
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Nurse turnover is a significant issue and complex challenge for all healthcare sectors and is exacerbated by a global nursing shortage. Nurse-Family Partnership is a community health program for first-time pregnant and parenting girls and young women living in situations of social and economic disadvantage. In Canada, this program is delivered exclusively by public health nurses and only within a research context. The aim of this article is to explore and describe factors that contribute to recruitment, retention, and turnover of public health nurses delivering Nurse-Family Partnership in British Columbia, Canada between 2013 and 2018.
Methods: Interpretive description was used to guide sampling, data collection and analytic decisions in this qualitative component drawn from the British Columbia Healthy Connections Project mixed methods process evaluation. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted with 28 public health nurses who practiced in and then exited Nurse-Family Partnership.
Results: Nurses were motivated to join this program because they wanted to deliver an evidence-based program for vulnerable young mothers that fit with their personal and professional philosophies and offered nurse autonomy. Access to program resources attracted nursing staff, while delivering a program that prioritizes maintaining relationships and emphasizes client successes was a positive work experience. Opportunities for ongoing professional development/ education, strong team connections, and working at full-scope of nursing practice were significant reasons for nurses to remain in Nurse-Family Partnership. Personal circumstances (retirement, family/health needs, relocation, career advancement) were the most frequently cited reasons leading to turnover. Other factors included: involuntary reasons, organizational and program factors, and geographical factors.
Conclusions: Public health organizations that deliver Nurse-Family Partnership may find aspects of job embeddedness theory useful for developing strategies for supporting recruitment and retention and reducing nurse turnover. Hiring nurses who are the right fit for this type of program may be a useful approach to increasing nurse retention. Fostering a culture of connectivity through team development along with supportive and communicative supervision are important factors associated with retention and may decrease turnover. Many involuntary/external factors were specific to being in a study environment. Program, organizational, and geographical factors affecting nurse turnover are modifiable.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies