Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Using 2nd generation basal insulins in type 2 diabetes: Costs and savings in a comparative economic analysis in Italy, based on the BRIGHT study.

Tytuł:
Using 2nd generation basal insulins in type 2 diabetes: Costs and savings in a comparative economic analysis in Italy, based on the BRIGHT study.
Autorzy:
Napoli R; Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.
Fanelli F; Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Gazzi L; Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Larosa M; Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Bitonti R; EBMA Consulting, Melegnano, Milan, Italy.
Furneri G; EBMA Consulting, Melegnano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: .
Źródło:
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD [Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis] 2020 Oct 30; Vol. 30 (11), pp. 1937-1944. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 08.
Typ publikacji:
Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2005- : Amsterdam : Elsevier
Original Publication: [Heidelberg] : Springer International, c1991-
MeSH Terms:
Drug Costs*
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/*drug therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/*economics
Glycemic Control/*economics
Hypoglycemic Agents/*economics
Hypoglycemic Agents/*therapeutic use
Insulin Glargine/*economics
Insulin Glargine/*therapeutic use
Insulin, Long-Acting/*economics
Insulin, Long-Acting/*therapeutic use
Biomarkers/blood ; Blood Glucose/drug effects ; Blood Glucose/metabolism ; Budgets ; Cost Savings ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis ; Glycemic Control/adverse effects ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects ; Insulin Glargine/adverse effects ; Insulin, Long-Acting/adverse effects ; Italy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: 2nd generation insulin; Budget impact analysis; Type 2 diabetes
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Biomarkers)
0 (Blood Glucose)
0 (Hypoglycemic Agents)
0 (Insulin, Long-Acting)
2ZM8CX04RZ (Insulin Glargine)
54Q18076QB (insulin degludec)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200911 Date Completed: 20201210 Latest Revision: 20201214
Update Code:
20240105
DOI:
10.1016/j.numecd.2020.07.005
PMID:
32912786
Czasopismo naukowe
Background and Aims: To evaluate the economic impact of using 2nd generation basal insulin analogs, Glargine 300 Units/ml (Gla-300) vs Degludec 100 Units/ml (IDeg-100), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods and Results: An economic analysis was conducted using findings from the BRIGHT study (the first controlled, head-to-head study comparing Gla-300 vs IDeg-100), and costs for the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS). A cost-minimization analysis (CMA) and a budget impact analysis (BIA) were conducted. Only pharmacological costs were included in the analysis. The CMA estimated patient treatment costs at 24 weeks and 1 year; the BIA assessed the economic impact of treating the overall Italian population of T2D insulin-naïve patients, who initiated insulin treatment during the period September 2017-August 2018 (N = 55 318). In the BIA, four different scenarios were compared: i) all patients receive IDeg-100 (Scenario A); ii) 61% of patients receive Gla-300, 39% IDeg-100 (Scenario B); iii) 80% of patients receive Gla-300, 20% IDeg-100 (Scenario C); iv) all patients treated with Gla-300 (Scenario D). The average treatment costs per patient were lower with Gla-300 vs IDeg-100 (at 24 weeks: €129 vs €161; at 1 year: €324 vs €409, respectively). Results of the BIA showed that comparing Scenario D vs Scenario A, total savings would amount to €1.76 million at 24 weeks, €4.73 million at 1 year, €5.53 million at 2 years.
Conclusion: A larger use of Gla-300 vs IDeg-100 for the treatment of T2D patients would lead to a relevant reduction of therapy costs in Italy.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest: R. Napoli received consulting fees from Sanofi Spa for writing the first draft of the manuscript and analysis conduction. L. Gazzi, F. Fanelli, and M. Larosa: employees of Sanofi Spa. G. Furneri and R. Bitonti: EBMA Consulting employees. EBMA Consulting received consulting fees from Sanofi Spa for analysis conduction.
(Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies