Nonverbal communication in selfies posted on Instagram: Another look at the effect of gender on vertical camera angle.

Tytuł:: Nonverbal communication in selfies posted on Instagram: Another look at the effect of gender on vertical camera angle.
Autorzy:: Soranzo A; Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Bruno N; Università di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Źródło:: PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 11; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0238588. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 11 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji:: Journal Article
Język:: English
Imprint Name(s):: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:: Gender Identity*
Nonverbal Communication*
Social Media*
Photography/*instrumentation
Female ; Humans ; Male
References:: Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 04;8:1460. (PMID: 28928683)
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2016 Mar;35(1):13-7. (PMID: 26963112)
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 27;5(9):e13010. (PMID: 20885953)
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 02;9:44. (PMID: 29456517)
Laterality. 2020 May;25(3):285-291. (PMID: 31544627)
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Oct;12(10):1226-7. (PMID: 19718035)
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;48(5):338-45. (PMID: 14526347)
Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 8;21(3):195-9. (PMID: 21256020)
Laterality. 2017 Jan;22(1):49-59. (PMID: 26555771)
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55141. (PMID: 23405117)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 08;19(9):e319. (PMID: 28887295)
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205893. (PMID: 30379895)
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):101-7. (PMID: 25799001)
Laterality. 2013;18(3):319-28. (PMID: 22746204)
Am J Hum Biol. 2007 Jan-Feb;19(1):82-7. (PMID: 17160983)
Laterality. 2009 Nov;14(6):545-72. (PMID: 19214864)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976 May;33(5):541-6. (PMID: 1271224)
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124999. (PMID: 25915767)
ScientificWorldJournal. 2016;2016:8306342. (PMID: 27064500)
Laterality. 2017 May;22(3):279-293. (PMID: 27229630)
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Dec;71(12):2586-2602. (PMID: 29364061)
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 28;18(6):e183. (PMID: 27352819)
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Apr 7;270(1516):709-12. (PMID: 12713744)
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Dec;75(6):1262-1263. (PMID: 27846953)
J Neuroophthalmol. 2016 Sep;36(3):292-3. (PMID: 27529328)
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:604. (PMID: 28484408)
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):115-21. (PMID: 17305457)
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:246. (PMID: 28270790)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1023-36. (PMID: 18593866)
Entry Date(s):: Date Created: 20200911 Date Completed: 20201027 Latest Revision: 20201027
Update Code:: 20240105
PubMed Central ID:: PMC7485807
DOI:: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238588
PMID:: 32915837
: Czasopismo naukowe

Pełny tekst

Background: Selfies are a novel social phenomenon that is gradually beginning to receive attention within the cognitive sciences. Several studies have documented biases that may be related to nonverbal communicative intentions. For instance, in selfies posted on the dating platform Tinder males but not females prefer camera views from below (Sedgewick, Flath & Elias, 2017). We re-examined this study to assess whether this bias is confined to dating selection contexts and to compare variability between individuals and between genders.
Methods: Three raters evaluated vertical camera position in 2000 selfies- 1000 by males and 1000 by females-posted in Instagram.
Results: We found that the choices of camera angle do seem to vary depending on the context under which the selfies were uploaded. On Tinder, females appear more likely to choose neutral, frontal presentations than they do on Instagram, whereas males on Tinder appear more likely to opt for camera angles from below than on Instagram.
Conclusions: This result confirms that the composition of selfies is constrained by factors affecting nonverbal communicative intentions.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Informacja