Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.

Tytuł:
What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.
Autorzy:
Zuiderwijk A; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Shinde R; D-BAUG Ökologisches Systemdesign, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jeng W; Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Źródło:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 18; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0239283. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 18 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Systematic Review
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
Ethics, Research*
Biomedical Research/*ethics
Research Personnel/*ethics
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Information Dissemination/ethics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Publications/ethics ; Trust
References:
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e67332. (PMID: 23935830)
PLoS Biol. 2011 Dec;9(12):e1001195. (PMID: 22162946)
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1062-9. (PMID: 26428912)
Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018. (PMID: 26978244)
PLoS One. 2007 Mar 21;2(3):e308. (PMID: 17375194)
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069. (PMID: 31337762)
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Sep 13;368(1926):4023-38. (PMID: 20679120)
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014 Nov;34(4):289-94. (PMID: 25309997)
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 8;15(6):e2002477. (PMID: 28594819)
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177158. (PMID: 28486511)
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 15;11(1):e0146695. (PMID: 26771577)
PeerJ. 2013 Oct 01;1:e175. (PMID: 24109559)
Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1633-5. (PMID: 21571134)
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. (PMID: 21738610)
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118053. (PMID: 25714752)
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 18;4(9):e7078. (PMID: 19763261)
J Abnorm Psychol. 1963 Nov;67:422-36. (PMID: 14081885)
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0189288. (PMID: 29281658)
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. (PMID: 26113702)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200918 Date Completed: 20201104 Latest Revision: 20231104
Update Code:
20240104
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7500699
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0239283
PMID:
32946521
Czasopismo naukowe
Both sharing and using open research data have the revolutionary potentials for forwarding scientific advancement. Although previous research gives insight into researchers' drivers and inhibitors for sharing and using open research data, both these drivers and inhibitors have not yet been integrated via a thematic analysis and a theoretical argument is lacking. This study's purpose is to systematically review the literature on individual researchers' drivers and inhibitors for sharing and using open research data. This study systematically analyzed 32 open data studies (published between 2004 and 2019 inclusively) and elicited drivers plus inhibitors for both open research data sharing and use in eleven categories total that are: 'the researcher's background', 'requirements and formal obligations', 'personal drivers and intrinsic motivations', 'facilitating conditions', 'trust', 'expected performance', 'social influence and affiliation', 'effort', 'the researcher's experience and skills', 'legislation and regulation', and 'data characteristics.' This study extensively discusses these categories, along with argues how such categories and factors are connected using a thematic analysis. Also, this study discusses several opportunities for altogether applying, extending, using, and testing theories in open research data studies. With such discussions, an overview of identified categories and factors can be further applied to examine both researchers' drivers and inhibitors in different research disciplines, such as those with low rates of data sharing and use versus disciplines with high rates of data sharing plus use. What's more, this study serves as a first vital step towards developing effective incentives for both open data sharing and use behavior.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies