Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

The Development of the Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory.

Tytuł:
The Development of the Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory.
Autorzy:
Min J; Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Mullins-Sweatt SN; Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Widiger TA; University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Źródło:
Assessment [Assessment] 2021 Jul; Vol. 28 (5), pp. 1334-1344. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 18.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Original Publication: Odessa, Fla. : Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., c1994-
MeSH Terms:
Borderline Personality Disorder*/diagnosis
Personality Disorders*
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Humans ; Personality Assessment ; Personality Inventory
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: borderline personality disorder; dimensional model; five-factor model; informant report
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200919 Date Completed: 20210813 Latest Revision: 20210813
Update Code:
20240104
DOI:
10.1177/1073191120959763
PMID:
32948115
Czasopismo naukowe
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is one of the most studied personality disorders and is associated with significant outcomes such as suicide. Although BPD is represented in DSM-5 as a categorical diagnosis, it may be better characterized dimensionally, such as from the perspective of the five-factor model of general personality (FFM). The Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) assesses BPD from the perspective of maladaptive variants of FFM traits. Previous research suggests that informant-reports may increase the validity of personality disorder assessment, providing additional information that may supplement self-report. Therefore, the current study developed an informant measure of the FFBI, Informant Five-Factor Borderline Inventory (IFFBI) and examined its convergent and discriminant validity compared with the self-report FFBI, FFM, and traditional measure of BPD. Overall, the IFFBI demonstrated good convergent validity and moderate discriminant validity with the FFBI, FFM, and other traditional measures of BPD.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies