-
Tytuł:
-
Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring.
-
Autorzy:
-
Kilmer SL; Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Northern California, Sacramento, California.; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis Medical School, Davis, California.
Cox SE; Aesthetic Solutions, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.; Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.; Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Zelickson BD; Zel Skin and Laser Specialists, Edina, Minnesota.; Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bachelor EP; Innovation Research Center, Pleasanton, California.; Eastbay Aesthetic Surgery, Pleasanton, California.
Gamio S; ZELTIQ, an Allergan affiliate, Pleasanton, California.
Ostrowski R; ZELTIQ, an Allergan affiliate, Pleasanton, California.
Pham LD; ZELTIQ, an Allergan affiliate, Pleasanton, California.
Stevens WG; Marina Plastic Surgery, Marina del Rey, California.; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.; USC-Marina del Rey Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship, Marina del Rey, California.
-
Źródło:
-
Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] [Dermatol Surg] 2020 Oct; Vol. 46 Suppl 1, pp. S14-S21.
-
Typ publikacji:
-
Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
-
Język:
-
English
-
Imprint Name(s):
-
Publication: 2021- : [Philadelphia] : Wolters Kluwer Health
Original Publication: New York, NY : Elsevier Science, c1995-
-
MeSH Terms:
-
Abdominal Muscles/*radiation effects
Cryosurgery/*methods
Lipoabdominoplasty/*methods
Magnetic Field Therapy/*methods
Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy/methods ; Cryosurgery/adverse effects ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Lipoabdominoplasty/adverse effects ; Magnetic Field Therapy/adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Subcutaneous Fat, Abdominal/surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
-
References:
-
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):63-68. (PMID: 27327898)
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):835-46. (PMID: 23858510)
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jun 01;37(6):715-722. (PMID: 28333359)
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):120-7. (PMID: 25586980)
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Dec;45(12):1542-1548. (PMID: 30882507)
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Nov 01;17(11):1229-1232. (PMID: 30500146)
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1581-1590. (PMID: 26017594)
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2019;21(4):238-242. (PMID: 30285505)
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018 Feb;20(1):24-27. (PMID: 28850270)
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Mar;34(3):420-31. (PMID: 24598865)
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jan;35(1):66-71. (PMID: 25568236)
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):20-6. (PMID: 24338439)
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Sep 01;19(5):350-357. (PMID: 28426847)
Dermatol Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1209-16. (PMID: 23639062)
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;17(5):783-787. (PMID: 30225976)
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):3-13. (PMID: 26607045)
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(8):2165-9. (PMID: 26100004)
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Sep;49(7):640-644. (PMID: 28464272)
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Dec;46(10):731-5. (PMID: 25395266)
Dermatol Surg. 2015 Sep;41(9):1043-51. (PMID: 26218826)
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Mar 01;4(1):66-75. (PMID: 24431963)
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Mar 22;:. (PMID: 29566270)
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):75-80. (PMID: 24535759)
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1185-1190. (PMID: 30672856)
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Jun;18(3):126-9. (PMID: 26735803)
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan 13;:. (PMID: 29331032)
Dermatol Surg. 2017 Jul;43(7):940-949. (PMID: 28595246)
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Sep;40(9):1004-9. (PMID: 25111437)
Lasers Surg Med. 2019 Jan;51(1):40-46. (PMID: 30302767)
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Sep;35(7):830-6. (PMID: 26038367)
-
Entry Date(s):
-
Date Created: 20200925 Date Completed: 20210120 Latest Revision: 20221005
-
Update Code:
-
20240105
-
PubMed Central ID:
-
PMC7515474
-
DOI:
-
10.1097/DSS.0000000000002420
-
PMID:
-
32976168
-
Background: In addition to reducing subcutaneous fat for body contouring, some patients are interested in toning the underlying muscle layer.
Objective: This feasibility study evaluated the safety and efficacy of electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) alone, cryolipolysis alone, and cryolipolysis with EMMS for noninvasive contouring of abdomen.
Methods: Abdomens of 50 subjects were treated in a study with 3 cohorts: EMMS alone, Cryolipolysis alone, and Cryolipolysis + EMMS in combination. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation treatments were delivered in 4 sessions over 2 weeks. Cryolipolysis treatments were delivered in one session. Combination treatments consisted of one cryolipolysis and 4 EMMS visits. Efficacy was assessed by independent physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), circumferential measurement, Subject GAIS (SGAIS), and Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ).
Results: Safety was demonstrated for all study cohorts with no device- or procedure-related adverse events. Independent photo review showed greatest mean GAIS score for the Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, then EMMS only cohort. BSQ showed greatest average score increase for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only cohort, then EMMS only cohort. Mean circumferential reduction measurements were greatest for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, and then EMMS only cohort. The mean SGAIS improvement score was equal for the Cryolipolysis only and Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohorts, followed by the EMMS only cohort.
Conclusion: A multimodal approach using cryolipolysis and EMMS was safe and demonstrated enhanced body contouring efficacy for this feasibility study.