Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Speaking up behavior and cognitive bias in hand hygiene: Competences of German-speaking medical students.

Tytuł:
Speaking up behavior and cognitive bias in hand hygiene: Competences of German-speaking medical students.
Autorzy:
Bushuven S; Institute for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hegau-Bodensee Hospital Singen and Hegau Jugendwerk Gailingen, Healthcare Association Constance (GLKN), Radolfzell, Germany.; Institute for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention, Healthcare Association Constance (GLKN), Radolfzell, Germany.; Institute for Didactics and Educational Research in Medicine, Clinic of the University Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dettenkofer M; Institute for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention, Healthcare Association Constance (GLKN), Radolfzell, Germany.
Sippel S; Institute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Koenig S; Institute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Bushuven S; Clinic for Orthopedics, Hand- and Trauma surgery, Hegau-Bodensee-Hospital Singen, Healthcare Association Constance (GLKN), Radolfzell, Germany.
Schneider-Brachert W; Department of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Źródło:
PloS one [PLoS One] 2020 Sep 28; Vol. 15 (9), pp. e0239444. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 28 (Print Publication: 2020).
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH Terms:
Cognition*
Hand Hygiene*
Language*
Professional Competence*
Students, Medical/*psychology
Adolescent ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Patient Safety ; Young Adult
References:
BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139. (PMID: 27143499)
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):708-17. (PMID: 26444174)
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 29;6(7):e012467. (PMID: 27473955)
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Dec;5(3):69-106. (PMID: 26158995)
Acad Med. 2006 Apr;81(4):354-73. (PMID: 16565188)
Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):958-63. (PMID: 23478533)
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020 May/Jun;41(3):197-198. (PMID: 30614962)
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;114:5-12. (PMID: 27566265)
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Sep;46(9):1026-1031. (PMID: 29650489)
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;30(7):611-22. (PMID: 19508124)
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 07;16(7):e164. (PMID: 25001007)
J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):264-270. (PMID: 30178904)
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104720. (PMID: 25116338)
Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):482-9. (PMID: 25213300)
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jun 1;44(6):666-70. (PMID: 26905791)
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;40(8):943-946. (PMID: 31294685)
Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):505-10. (PMID: 24597660)
J Patient Saf. 2017 Nov 4;:. (PMID: 29112033)
Judgm Decis Mak. 2017 Jan;12(1):29-41. (PMID: 29861807)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):240-247. (PMID: 27044881)
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(8):1382-97. (PMID: 24467720)
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):16-7. (PMID: 20078751)
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Mar;68(3):569-79. (PMID: 21722171)
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):502-17. (PMID: 18426301)
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1994 Jun;16(6):269-72. (PMID: 8075163)
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Dec;13(6):697-700. (PMID: 21142995)
J Pediatr Health Care. 2000 Mar-Apr;14(2):77-80. (PMID: 10736144)
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863. (PMID: 24324449)
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;27(9):931-4. (PMID: 16941318)
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72. (PMID: 17286625)
BMJ. 2019 Jul 2;366:l4461. (PMID: 31266748)
Am J Infect Control. 2019 May;47(5):545-550. (PMID: 30528170)
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Aug 2;77(8):471-5. (PMID: 27487058)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jun;21(6):499-502. (PMID: 22357778)
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jun 1;44(6):691-704. (PMID: 27240800)
Hosp Pediatr. 2016 Dec;6(12):738-743. (PMID: 27909093)
Postgrad Med J. 2015 May;91(1075):251-6. (PMID: 25898840)
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):787-91. (PMID: 22730899)
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):602-605. (PMID: 29116984)
Med Teach. 2017 Feb;39(2):136-140. (PMID: 27866457)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200928 Date Completed: 20201109 Latest Revision: 20201109
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7521694
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0239444
PMID:
32986726
Czasopismo naukowe
Introduction: Infection prevention and speaking up on errors are core qualities of health care providers. Heuristic effects (e.g. overconfidence) may impair behavior in daily routine, while speaking up can be inhibited by hierarchical barriers and medical team factors. Aim of this investigation was to determine, how medical students experience these difficulties for hand hygiene in daily routine.
Methods: On the base of prior investigations we developed a questionnaire with 5-point Likert ordinal scaled items and free text entries. This was tested for validity and reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.89). Accredited German, Swiss and Austrian universities were contacted and medical students asked to participated in the anonymous online survey. Quantitative statistics used parametric and non-parametric tests and effect size calculations according to Lakens. Qualitative data was coded according to Janesick.
Results: 1042 undergraduates of 12 universities participated. All rated their capabilities in hand hygiene and feedback reception higher than those of fellow students, nurses and physicians (p<0.001). Half of the participants rating themselves to be best educated, realized that faulty hand hygiene can be of lethal effect. Findings were independent from age, sex, academic course and university. Speaking-up in case of omitted hand hygiene was rated to be done seldomly and most rare on persons of higher hierarchic levels. Qualitative results of 164 entries showed four main themes: 1) Education methods in hand hygiene are insufficient, 2) Hierarchy barriers impair constructive work place culture 3) Hygiene and feedback are linked to medical ethics and 4) There is no consequence for breaking hygiene rules.
Discussion: Although partially limited by the selection bias, this study confirms the overconfidence-effects demonstrated in post-graduates in other settings and different professions. The independence from study progress suggests, that the effect occurs before start of the academic course with need for educational intervention at the very beginning. Qualitative data showed that used methods are insufficient and contradictory work place behavior in hospitals are frustrating. Even 20 years after "To err is human", work place culture still is far away from the desirable.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do pełnego tekstu.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies