Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Tytuł pozycji:

Interactive effect of 2 dietary calcium and phytase levels on broilers challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis: part 1-broiler performance, gut lesions and pH, bacterial counts, and apparent ileal digestibility.

Tytuł:
Interactive effect of 2 dietary calcium and phytase levels on broilers challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis: part 1-broiler performance, gut lesions and pH, bacterial counts, and apparent ileal digestibility.
Autorzy:
Zanu HK; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Kheravii SK; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Morgan NK; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Bedford MR; AB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire SN8 4AN, United Kingdom.
Swick RA; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Electronic address: .
Źródło:
Poultry science [Poult Sci] 2020 Oct; Vol. 99 (10), pp. 4861-4873. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jun 26.
Typ publikacji:
Journal Article
Język:
English
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: 2020- : [Cambridge, UK] : Elsevier
Original Publication: Champaign Il : Poultry Science Association
MeSH Terms:
6-Phytase*/pharmacology
Calcium, Dietary*/pharmacology
Clostridium Infections*/therapy
Clostridium Infections*/veterinary
Enteritis*/physiopathology
Enteritis*/therapy
Enteritis*/veterinary
Gastrointestinal Microbiome*/drug effects
Poultry Diseases*/therapy
Animal Feed/analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Bacterial Load/veterinary ; Chickens ; Diet/veterinary ; Dietary Supplements/analysis ; Digestion/drug effects ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Male
References:
Br J Nutr. 1995 Jan;73(1):125-39. (PMID: 7857907)
Poult Sci. 1997 Jan;76(1):37-46. (PMID: 9037686)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):4214-24. (PMID: 16751534)
Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2217-22. (PMID: 21934003)
Poult Sci. 2001 Oct;80(10):1451-4. (PMID: 11599704)
J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2008;1(5):240-51. (PMID: 19776631)
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Aug 1;4(1):23. (PMID: 30066050)
Poult Sci. 2003 Apr;82(4):671-80. (PMID: 12710490)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):3911-6. (PMID: 16000804)
Poult Sci. 2014 Apr;93(4):906-15. (PMID: 24706968)
Poult Sci. 2014 Feb;93(2):354-63. (PMID: 24570457)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Sep;62(9):3112-20. (PMID: 8795197)
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Apr;102(4):1138-49. (PMID: 17381758)
Poult Sci. 2013 Aug;92(8):1997-2004. (PMID: 23873546)
Poult Sci. 2018 Jul 1;97(7):2435-2440. (PMID: 29562263)
Poult Sci. 2012 Jun;91(6):1371-8. (PMID: 22582295)
PLoS Pathog. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000516. (PMID: 19609357)
Avian Dis. 2015 Mar;59(1):38-45. (PMID: 26292532)
Poult Sci. 2015 Nov;94(11):2753-62. (PMID: 26500275)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2420-7. (PMID: 11976117)
Infect Immun. 2006 Nov;74(11):6496-500. (PMID: 16923791)
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e92156. (PMID: 24637645)
Poult Sci. 2014 Oct;93(10):2464-72. (PMID: 25104766)
Nutr Res Rev. 2000 Dec;13(2):255-78. (PMID: 19087442)
Poult Sci. 2013 Dec;92(12):3125-33. (PMID: 24235221)
Poult Sci. 2006 Jan;85(1):48-55. (PMID: 16493945)
Br Poult Sci. 1991 Jul;32(3):535-44. (PMID: 1909924)
Poult Sci. 2006 Oct;85(10):1737-45. (PMID: 17012163)
Gut. 2003 Mar;52(3):439-51. (PMID: 12584232)
Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;89(10):2221-9. (PMID: 20852113)
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3311-7. (PMID: 14506046)
Poult Sci. 2016 Mar;95(3):581-9. (PMID: 26740131)
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun;90(6):1824-32. (PMID: 22228039)
J Clin Invest. 2003 Apr;111(7):931-43. (PMID: 12671039)
Poult Sci. 2019 Mar 1;98(3):1254-1262. (PMID: 30329103)
Poult Sci. 2017 Oct 1;96(10):3626-3637. (PMID: 28938789)
Toxins (Basel). 2010 Jul;2(7):1913-27. (PMID: 22069665)
Poult Sci. 2015 May;94(5):898-905. (PMID: 25762162)
Poult Sci. 2017 Jul 1;96(7):2243-2253. (PMID: 28204754)
Poult Sci. 1996 Dec;75(12):1516-23. (PMID: 9000277)
Poult Sci. 2009 Jan;88(1):132-40. (PMID: 19096067)
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Dec;22:14-21. (PMID: 25195171)
Poult Sci. 2000 Feb;79(2):212-8. (PMID: 10735749)
Poult Sci. 2018 May 1;97(5):1627-1640. (PMID: 29506047)
Anim Nutr. 2015 Sep;1(3):184-191. (PMID: 29767136)
Poult Sci. 2015 Apr;94(4):673-80. (PMID: 25691757)
Poult Sci. 2007 Mar;86(3):531-7. (PMID: 17297166)
Poult Sci. 2014 Dec;93(12):3044-52. (PMID: 25332137)
Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1155-1162. (PMID: 29444320)
Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1177-1188. (PMID: 29325118)
Br J Nutr. 2009 Feb;101(4):541-50. (PMID: 18590586)
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2009 Sep;148(3):360-2. (PMID: 20396688)
Poult Sci. 2004 Aug;83(8):1358-67. (PMID: 15339011)
Poult Sci. 2014 Nov;93(11):2752-62. (PMID: 25143591)
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41(1):77-81. (PMID: 15960756)
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 28;9(8):e104739. (PMID: 25167074)
Avian Pathol. 2005 Jun;34(3):159-80. (PMID: 16191699)
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):2967-76. (PMID: 26115283)
Poult Sci. 2004 Jan;83(1):61-8. (PMID: 14761085)
Poult Sci. 2019 Sep 1;98(9):3884-3893. (PMID: 30877747)
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007 Oct;20(4):593-621. (PMID: 17934076)
Poult Sci. 2016 Jul 1;95(7):1573-1581. (PMID: 26933234)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: broiler; dietary calcium; necrotic enteritis; performance; phytase
Substance Nomenclature:
0 (Calcium, Dietary)
EC 3.1.3.26 (6-Phytase)
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20200929 Date Completed: 20210322 Latest Revision: 20210322
Update Code:
20240105
PubMed Central ID:
PMC7810914
DOI:
10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.033
PMID:
32988523
Czasopismo naukowe
This study investigated the hypothesis that high dietary calcium (Ca) would stimulate necrotic enteritis (NE) and reduce performance, gut health, and nutrient digestibility, and if increased, phytase would reduce NE. Ross 308 male broilers (n = 768) were randomly distributed to 8 treatments in a factorial arrangement. Factors were NE challenge (no or yes), phytase level (500 or 1,500 FTU/kg using 500 FTU/kg matrix values), and Ca level (0.6 or 1.0% starter, 0.5 or 0.9% grower, 0.4 or 0.8% finisher) with the same level of available P (0.40 S, 0.35 G, and 0.35 F). There were 48 pens, 16 birds per pen and 6 replications. Half of the birds were challenged with Eimeria spp on day 9 and 10 8  CFU per mL of Clostridium perfringens strain EHE-NE18 on day 14 and 15. Gain was higher in birds fed high phytase on day 14 (P < 0.01), day 21 (P < 0.01), day 28 (P < 0.01), and day 35 (P < 0.01). Birds fed high phytase had greater livability on day 21 (P < 0.01). Ca was more digestible in high-Ca diets on day 16, and an NE × Ca interaction (P < 0.05) showed this effect to be more pronounced in unchallenged than in challenged birds. A challenge × Ca interaction for apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (CP) (P < 0.05) indicated lower AID of CP in challenged birds fed high Ca. The challenge decreased AID of Ca (P < 0.01). Ca level had no impact on C. perfringens count, but it decreased Lactobacillus (P < 0.05) and Bifidobacteria (P < 0.05) populations in the ceca. High dietary Ca decreased feed conversion ratio. Overall (42 D), the highest WG was observed in unchallenged birds fed high Ca and high phytase with the lowest WG observed in NE-challenged birds fed low Ca and low phytase. The results suggest that full matrix values for high doses of phytase may be appropriate during NE challenge.
(Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies